12 Teams - 1 Trophy

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Seattle(-4) over Minnesota (1*)
- - These appear to be four interesting playoff matchups to handicap, and watch. I could feel fairly comfortable making the case for each side in any of the games, except Minnesota.

We hope interesting matchups produce memorable games, but no question playoff games frequently unfold as one-sided affairs. Or not.

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Cincinnati(+115 ML) over Pittsburgh (1*)
- - It?s easy to understand any disdain for Marvin Lewis and his consistently putrid Bungles when it comes time to elevate their game when it matters the most . . . After their last two efforts, it?s easy to understand any queasiness being felt aboard the large bandwagon of pundits and gamblers who were congregated behind Roethlisberger and the Steelers as a force to be reckoned with in the postseason . . . The pressure is squarely on the Bengals, but maybe today features the right tonic in getting a familiar and bitter rival showing up as the favorite, and needing to step up to help their unproven QB instead of having the Red Rifle sinking under the pressure and the whole squad listlessly succumbing in tow . . . But as it is, I think I prefer the +115 ML over risking more while getting points at +3(-131).

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Kansas City(-3) over Houston (1*)
- - Initially I was postulating that stringing together a 10 game winning streak and then going on the road for a playoff game might be a ripe spot for running into a wall . . . After looking at the matchups, I like the job done by both coaching staffs, but I have to conclude Houston is at least as likely to be ecstatic over a job well done, and I see more intangibles driving the Chiefs to this point in their journey. I gotta go with Kansas City as being the real deal here and ready to take care of business today.

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Green Bay(+1) over Washington (1 Biscuit)
- - There is no sugar coating the way the Packers have played with their heads up their asses for 10 weeks. And what?s been most troubling is the way Rodgers has been guilty of the same offense. Although it?s been a season of mounting injuries for Green Bay and around most of the league, IMO that has only been a contributing factor, at least until you get to the point of making your All Pro left guard an out of sorts left tackle . . . Green Bay is not imploding and Washington is not a late season juggernaut. I see comments like Washington is better than Green Bay in this area and that area, including almost no gap at the QB position, and I respectfully disagree. Green Bay has been locked in the playoffs for weeks and IMO has been making whatever concerted effort was possible to be healthy for today. They have a hungry and proud team of leaders and playmakers. They will definitely need to embrace the moment as they have when coming in crippled up in similar January spots as "nobody's underdog", and I don?t look at this game expecting Green Bay to lose.

Green Bay/Washington(Ov46) (1 Biscuit)
- - Simply put, each time this game unfolds in the cinema playing in my head, regardless of who prevails, almost every instance involves the Packers playoff MO and the Skins late season MO of points going on the scoreboard.

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
NFL Playoffs: 3-2 (+0.90*)

Kansas City(+5) over New England (1*)
- - Kansas City looks ready to me to be a legitimate threat in this spot and against the whole AFC field.
- - (1) What New England needed was a week off. What Kansas City needed was a playoff challenge before taking on the champs. No matter how poor Houston was, Kansas City passed their test, and pitched a shutout in the process.
- - (2) As Ron Jaworski would say, Kansas City has been playing ?great complementary football - offense, defense and special teams.? When New England has the ball, KC presents a tough defense against which to pick your way down the field. KC is not explosive on offense, but they have a QB with 10 TDs and 1 interception on his post season CV, and Andy Reid has enough on his roster to hit back after Belichick focuses on taking away what KC does best. IMO there have been opportunities against New England this season, even when healthiest, through a 10-0 start and a 2-4 close; whatever weaknesses may exist on New England (whether close to full strength today or not), there is a good chance Kansas City can do some exposing and exploiting.
- - (3) Starting with the return of Eric Berry, adding the noise generated by the World Series tenants across the way, the obvious chemistry underpinning an 11 game winning streak, and finally the challenge of being tasked with going on the road to face the champs, I think the intangibles under the collective wings of the visitors match or exceed the emotional juice of the black eye and the middle finger tour.

GL
 
Last edited:

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Green Bay(-7') over Arizona (1*)
- - I?d rate Arizona first among the 8 teams still standing as having remained healthiest on their journey to this week, and IMO they still look healthiest, in huge contrast to the way Arizona limped into and out of the final 12 last year. Across from them, most everything suggests this week is A Bridge Too Far for Green Bay to travel in their laborious season.
- - (1) If it needed any proving, Green Bay showed again last week they have the components and the chops for playing in January, but one game against Washington is capable of deceiving. If Arizona falters at all in this spot, IMO it starts with the GB defense seizing a couple of pick opportunities off an aggressive QB Palmer (similar to when Green Bay got their mitts on four picks at Seattle last year), and Palmer had the benefit of some substantial luck during the season in order to dodge a fair number of pick opportunities. Green Bay had no good fortune in their last visit to the desert, having two sack fumbles returned for touchdowns, and coughing up another fumble on the first play of the second half.
- - (2) If QB Rodgers does anything transcendent, IMO it is built around some redemptive play by Green Bay's OL which has proven itself in big spots before. Makes sense to me when the alternative is counting on banner contributions from a receiving cast of James Jones, Randall Cobb, Richard Rogers and a fragile Jared Abbrederis.
- - (3) Seattle did the Packers no favor by giving Arizona a wake up call beat down before their bye week. And with Packers fans not having had months to acquire tickets, even the stadium atmosphere in Glendale will contrast with the recent invasion of cheeseheads and should supply a jolt to the proceedings.
- - (4) I?ll cherry-pick a couple of surprising trends: the Packers are 5-1 ATS in their last 6 playoff road games, and the Cardinals are 1-5 ATS vs. a team with a winning record.
- - (5) The game definitely feels set to get over the 50 point threshhold. In the alternative, I know I?d love to be transported right now to the 4th quarter of a game in which these teams are engaged in a 20-17 fistfight.
- - (6) I?m really surprised with the number of cappers and pundits giving Green Bay some love this week. Simply put, IMO Arizona stands out among the 8 teams playing this weekend as claiming the strongest mix of tangibles and intangibles for advancing as the better team. I?m thankful for last week's buoyancy and willing to grasp for reasons to think Green Bay can hang around and shock the world.

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
NFL Playoffs: 5-3 (+1.80*)

New England(-3)(-118) over Denver (1.5*)
- - Brady and his cast vs. Manning and his cast, a championship encore. Which one takes it over the finish line? Sorry, I don't see Denver as the play . . . BTW, Denver had great field position last week, New England did not, and what I saw made an impression.

GL
 
Last edited:

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Upon further review . . .

Denver(+3)(-103) over New England (2.5*)
- - Canceling my earlier play and going with Denver:
(1) I think the chances are much better for Manning without a whole lot of expectations playing Big in this tilt than there would have been for Osweiler while carrying greater expectations, and I think the chances are much better that the Broncos team elevates their game playing for Manning . . . HC Kubiak lucked into Peyton even being his QB for the postseason because of the San Diego game, and in the process he gets an aging veteran that is much fresher and with a stronger command than he possessed at this point last year . . . FWIW I thought Manning looked cagey last week and he didn?t press despite being behind.
(2) Last week, KC couldn?t molest Brady early, and that failure only got worse as the game wore on, allowing one-dimensional New England to take long and laborious marches down the field. Even so, despite KC getting stunned by one crucial fumble, the Chiefs were one lucky ricochet away from having a chance to tie, with Alex Smith playing great and a threat to deliver. If the Denver defense can play today in their home environs anything like the best defense in the NFL, it can?t possibly go that smoothly for 60 minutes for any visitor.
(3) As an aside, it?s fairly clear from the Miami game that Belichick opted for giving Denver the home field advantage in order to get his team healthy, while it might not have come down to a choice but for Belichick?s inexplicable choice to kick after winning the overtime coin toss against the Jets.
(4) On the whole, IMO it doesn?t really shape up as a choice spot for being labeled the favorite while carrying a 2-6 SU record on another visit to the Mile High city . . . I've seen lots of respected voices lining up behind the live home dog . . . It should play out as a memorable championship tilt.

GL
 
Last edited:

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
New England(-3)(-125)(2h) over Denver (1*)
- - Belichick over Kubiak when it comes to halftime adjustments, in this game probably more so on defense against Peyton's wheeling and dealing. Nevertheless, while it feels like Denver has the upper hand, if the Broncos get it done they will likely be holding on at the end, and I'm not going to get caught puking and holding just a losing bet if it happens.

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Carolina(-3)(-125) over Arizona (1*)
- - OK:
(1) Cam Newton is genuine, he genuinely loves himself. I thought that observation a decent jumping off point.
(2) Carolina has superior stats, but I?m not sure they should be given too much weight given the contrast in strength of schedule.
(3) It?s the eyeball test for me on matchups and intangibles. I suspect Arizona on offense will look for success getting the ball on the edges and not squaring off against the heart of the Carolina defense. Arizona will play aggressive on defense, but discipline is more likely to frustrate Carolina.
(4) After Carolina caught Seattle flat-footed to start their heavyweight matchup and found the going too easy while racing out to a 31-0 halftime lead, I was concerned Carolina would lose some intensity after the halftime break, and sure enough they did. Now the question is whether they picked up some bad habits, or whether that Super Bowl intensity and belief still infuses the squad . . . Carson Palmer was not alone last week in playing tight for Arizona as a prohibitive favorite; does that whole squad now flex their Super Bowl look?
(5) Both teams have their wagering camps. I look at Arizona?s OL with Palmer at QB and their Northern Iowa rookie running back and I think the advantage in dictating flow and outcome lies with the energized front 7 of the Carolina defense. When the Carolina offense is on the field I don?t love all that ego, but I?ve seen what?s been built all season and I do love me some Cam getting this here team to the Super Bowl.

Arizona/Carolina(Ov47)(-119) (1*)
- - Each time this game unfolds in the cinema playing in my head, it consistently featurs touchdowns rather than fistfights over field position.

GL
 

Scrapman

Rollingdembones
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2013
5,929
112
63
south east PA
NFL Playoffs: 9-3 (+5.53*)

Carolina(-4)(-106) over Denver (1*)
- -

GL

go for it all lostinamerica 10 phugging buttermilk biscuits if you can.

see my thread for the stat both teams shown full season ypg of offense and TO's Panthers win by 17 or more points


35 - 17 i predict

manning noodle old arm just cannot keep pace with Newton.
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
When the playoffs began I thought Carolina was capable of playing the best football and was showing a Super Bowl look. I still think that. I won?t be taking the Bronco?s Story against whether Carolina clicks on some critical possessions on offense and defense in the Super Bowl.

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
262
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Denver vs. Carolina:

(1) To start at the beginning, my take on Cam Newton coming into this season was that his cannon arm was not consistently accurate with all the fastballs or touch throws, but the guy had a propensity to step up and deliver deadly throws from lots of platforms when he most had to have them. This season, starting with the Green Bay game, my take was I was tracking QB play at an MVP level, regularly dealing for entire games . . . So, Cam Newton genuinely loves himself, has some bad fundamentals and amazing athleticism, and IMO he missed a decent number of throws in the Arizona game. Everyone gets amped up for the Super Bowl, so there is at least a bit of concern over whether Cam might struggle with some early misfires before he settles into the game.

(2) Denver has the best defense in the league, sound, disciplined and multi-faceted. But in Carolina they get a complete team that has a dual threat MVP QB, a dynamic rushing attack and a formidable defense of their own. IMO nothing counters a pass rush better than running right at it with success, and equally important IMO is Carolina making Denver defend a whole field of weapons in a way New England could not. The Carolina OL is an obvious strength of their team and has been together all season. Going further, I?m confident Carolina is the team most capable of turning turnovers into touchdowns. In the matchups, I see clear advantages favoring Carolina.

(3) I?ve been a vocal fan of Ron Rivera as a coach since his days with the Bears. Back when this season featured a record number of 5-0 teams it was always Carolina that was dismissed as the fraud, and they really haven?t gotten much recognition as a favorite for anything. IMO the reality of this season is Rivera has taken a team to 14-0 and still got them peaking at the right time.

(4) My play for this game was enthusiastic and without hesitation, not dependent on a stray half point, but I?m not at all surprised I ended up with line value. At the same time I mentally steeled myself against waffling if the personality being displayed by Carolina appeared like a team being too loose or having too much fun, which could generally make me wary. But in the immediate aftermath of the NFC championship game I was very pleased with what I heard from everyone associated with Carolina about the final step on their journey. And although I have somewhat avoided any immersion in the build up this week, what I have seen has been consistent with the way Rivera has kept this team right on point with their focused and loose personality. Still showing their Super Bowl look, no question here.

(5) I think my assessment of Manning and Kubiak in my earlier comments was accurate. My posted comments confirm I was not caught surprised when Manning played his best half in two years against New England, nor surprised when New England shut him down in the second half . . . The Denver backers can counter with the situational or matchup advantages they are seeing, and what adversity Carolina will be unable to overcome, which has them thinking they are on the right side with a live dog. I know it would be the intangibles and not the matchups or fundamentals which could get me to see the Denver side. But I'm on Carolina, and I?ll close by contributing my thoughts that pressure up the middle will not be Manning?s friend on Sunday, that two weeks is not what Manning needed in this spot, and Denver has earned their reputation for being far from dominant away from the Mile High city.

GL
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top