Just thought I'd post a new "technique" I'm going to track. I set my own lines every week. At bestbettor, I'm tracking how those lines would do if I played them depending on their difference from the real lines.
For example, I had NE listed as a 1.5 pt dog. Since they're getting 2.5, NE is the bet.
I had TB listed as an 8 pt fave. Since its only 7, TB is the play.
If I hit the line exactly, it's a no-play.
Now, some of these plays are actually opposite what my actual plays are posted here. The only reason I post this is that if I was betting with this method this this year, I'd be doing pretty well, and I thought i'd use bestbettor to track it. If anyone sees a discrepancy b/w those picks and my posted picks, that's why.
Here are the lines I came up with. This was actually a week that I was closer to the actual lines than normal.
bal +6
ne +1.5
phi -4.5
pitt -3.5
dall PK <- way off!! I didn't realize DET was getting respect.
cin +4
tenn +3.5
MINN +8
NYJ +5
STL -1
SF +2.5
wash +3
jax +3
MIA +4.5
gl
For example, I had NE listed as a 1.5 pt dog. Since they're getting 2.5, NE is the bet.
I had TB listed as an 8 pt fave. Since its only 7, TB is the play.
If I hit the line exactly, it's a no-play.
Now, some of these plays are actually opposite what my actual plays are posted here. The only reason I post this is that if I was betting with this method this this year, I'd be doing pretty well, and I thought i'd use bestbettor to track it. If anyone sees a discrepancy b/w those picks and my posted picks, that's why.
Here are the lines I came up with. This was actually a week that I was closer to the actual lines than normal.
bal +6
ne +1.5
phi -4.5
pitt -3.5
dall PK <- way off!! I didn't realize DET was getting respect.
cin +4
tenn +3.5
MINN +8
NYJ +5
STL -1
SF +2.5
wash +3
jax +3
MIA +4.5
gl
