A Tea Party Foreign Policy

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
A Tea Party Foreign Policy

Why the growing grassroots movement can't fight big government at home while supporting it abroad.

BY RON PAUL | AUGUST 27, 2010

teaparty.jpg


As one who is opposed to centralization, I am wary of attempts to turn a grassroots movement against big government like the Tea Party into an adjunct of the Republican Party. I find it even more worrisome when I see those who willingly participated in the most egregious excesses of the most recent Republican Congress push their way into leadership roles of this movement without batting an eye -- or changing their policies!

As many frustrated Americans who have joined the Tea Party realize, we cannot stand against big government at home while supporting it abroad. We cannot talk about fiscal responsibility while spending trillions on occupying and bullying the rest of the world. We cannot talk about the budget deficit and spiraling domestic spending without looking at the costs of maintaining an American empire of more than 700 military bases in more than 120 foreign countries. We cannot pat ourselves on the back for cutting a few thousand dollars from a nature preserve or an inner-city swimming pool at home while turning a blind eye to a Pentagon budget that nearly equals those of the rest of the world combined.

Our foreign policy is based on an illusion: that we are actually paying for it. What we are doing is borrowing and printing money to maintain our presence overseas. Americans are seeing the cost of this irresponsible approach as their own communities crumble and our economic decline continues.

I see tremendous opportunities for movements like the Tea Party to prosper by capitalizing on the Democrats' broken promises to overturn the George W. Bush administration's civil liberties abuses and end the disastrous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. A return to the traditional U.S. foreign policy of active private engagement but government noninterventionism is the only alternative that can restore our moral and fiscal health. I am optimistic, and our numbers are increasing!
<!-- SHARE BOX -->
 

Roger Baltrey

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 13, 2005
2,896
24
38
Exactumundo, but the bufoons who have joined this movment will not utter a sound about the government spending on defence. Once again, you can't run 2 wars, increase spending dramatically and cut taxes. If you do you will have a massive deficit and the economy sucks. Betcha this didn't get brought up today at Mr. Hemorroids rally in DC.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Exactumundo, but the bufoons who have joined this movment will not utter a sound about the government spending on defence. Once again, you can't run 2 wars, increase spending dramatically and cut taxes. If you do you will have a massive deficit and the economy sucks. Betcha this didn't get brought up today at Mr. Hemorroids rally in DC.


And they won't say anything about cutting any other expenditures either.

Teabaggers are, as they say, "All mouth, no ass".
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
A Tea Party Foreign Policy

Why the growing grassroots movement can't fight big government at home while supporting it abroad.

BY RON PAUL | AUGUST 27, 2010

As one who is opposed to centralization, I am wary of attempts to turn a grassroots movement against big government like the Tea Party into an adjunct of the Republican Party. I find it even more worrisome when I see those who willingly participated in the most egregious excesses of the most recent Republican Congress push their way into leadership roles of this movement without batting an eye -- or changing their policies!

As many frustrated Americans who have joined the Tea Party realize, we cannot stand against big government at home while supporting it abroad. We cannot talk about fiscal responsibility while spending trillions on occupying and bullying the rest of the world. We cannot talk about the budget deficit and spiraling domestic spending without looking at the costs of maintaining an American empire of more than 700 military bases in more than 120 foreign countries. We cannot pat ourselves on the back for cutting a few thousand dollars from a nature preserve or an inner-city swimming pool at home while turning a blind eye to a Pentagon budget that nearly equals those of the rest of the world combined.

Our foreign policy is based on an illusion: that we are actually paying for it. What we are doing is borrowing and printing money to maintain our presence overseas. Americans are seeing the cost of this irresponsible approach as their own communities crumble and our economic decline continues.

I see tremendous opportunities for movements like the Tea Party to prosper by capitalizing on the Democrats' broken promises to overturn the George W. Bush administration's civil liberties abuses and end the disastrous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. A return to the traditional U.S. foreign policy of active private engagement but government noninterventionism is the only alternative that can restore our moral and fiscal health. I am optimistic, and our numbers are increasing!
<!-- SHARE BOX -->
Ron Paul's sounding more like me everyday. I'm thinking of suing him for plagiarism... :SIB
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
And they won't say anything about cutting any other expenditures either.

Teabaggers are, as they say, "All mouth, no ass".

Really,

is it possible for you to get your point across without always having to refer to sodomizing someone? Although it certainly is telling allot about you.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top