Any Believers Yet?????

LET'S EAT!!!

Registered User
Forum Member
May 6, 2002
1,156
0
0
56
Portland.OR.
angels are for real in case anyone still had any questions....the dog days are over in this series.....angels are on fire right now and are playing with too much confidence and determination....word to the wise: DON'T COME UP FOR THE BULLSHIT +$ DOG PLAY TOMORROW IF THE TWINS OPEN AS A DOG
;) .....good luck and go halos!!!:thumb:
 

ferdville

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 24, 1999
3,165
5
0
78
So Cal
I suppose that Mays can shut down the Angels again or that Appier can get rocked by the Twins. However, all I have heard for the past few days is #1 Milton is deadly against the Angels. He had a no-hitter against them a few years ago. He was pitching lights out at end of year. Result - great start by Milton, but Angels win. #2 Radke is devastating against the Angels. He is 11-4 all time with an era under 2.00 He was the best pitcher in the last month or so of season. Result - Radke pitches great game, bullpen gets blown out, Angels win. I have heard what a great baserunning team the Twins are. How many stolen bases do they have? How many guys has JP thrown out? Erstad's pressure caused them all kinds of problems tonite. It may be hard for some people to admit it, but the Angels are just a better team than the Twins. Their starting pitching is equal or better; their bullpen is better; their bats are hotter. If you noticed tonite, Scoscia used Ochoa as pinch runner instead of Figgins. Figgins has blazing speed but is not a good base runner. Angels are making the adjustments they have made throughout the year. And, pleeeeeeeeeease, don't anyone tell me that you have to bet the Twinkies tomorrow because THEY HAVE TO WIN. Everybody has to win or be eliminated sometime. I am not touting the Angels as a lock tomorrow, but for Minnesota to sweep the next 3 games is highly unlikely. The Halos had every reason to lose last nite's game. They blew chance after chance after chance, yet still came through in the 8th. Like the Yankees of old, an Angel game has basically been shortened to 7 innings. If they have the lead or are even after 7, chalk it up. The better bullpen has already been decided in favor of Angels.
 

LET'S EAT!!!

Registered User
Forum Member
May 6, 2002
1,156
0
0
56
Portland.OR.
nickie my boy....

nickie my boy....

oh nickie my boy....let me guess?? is this another one of your "value" plays??:lol: kind of like your ALCS +140 MINNY OVER ANAHEIM 400/560 post on 10/8 ???.......:nono: well it looks like your at it again....riding those dogs:nono: ....do you ever play a favorite??oh i forgot "no value" there on those favorites,right?? i'll be playing anaheim -165 330/200 tomorrow....not as sure about it as your "take it to the bank" claim.....but what i am sure about nickie....you can take your minny in the series 400/560 ticket and wipe your ass with it pal:moon: take that to the bank :thefinger
 

vchipsliu

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2002
750
1
0
56
Taiwan
Don't be so mean!!!
We are not here to open a fans club or something like that, right?
Your play won, you are the man here. Otherwise, good luck next time. If you play your halos everytime and you win them all.
(5 more straight games to win WS )Then you are the man!

GLTL
 

LET'S EAT!!!

Registered User
Forum Member
May 6, 2002
1,156
0
0
56
Portland.OR.
vchipsliu....

vchipsliu....

not trying to be mean ....just felt nick was trying to be a smart ass by posting his "take it to the bank" claim on my thread that said "dont come up for any bullshit +$ dog play tomorrow on the twins"....he did it just to be contrary....i'm just not one of the mj'ers that is going sit back and cow down to nick just because he's one of the cappers here.....if someone wants to sling shit i'll be more than happy to sling it back with anyone on here....dont care who it is....so take it for what its worth and i kind of like your fan club idea;).....by the way i'm sure nickie can handle himself!!
 

MagiTek

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 18, 2002
315
0
0
48
Ontario Canada
All capping skills aside: This is just plain bad etiquette..

Let's Eat, I think you have a case to bitch. When you post a play and someone replies with a fade-play, just to be, as you say, contrary, it seems unclassy and distasteful. I know this 'Nick Douglas' character seems to garner a good amount of respect around here, and maybe, deservedly so. I don't know him at all so I can only go on what I've seen. Now, I don't blame him for being a bit ornery considering he's got a series bet on Minny that is looking pretty bleak. But still, I consider what he did to be the equivilant of walking into your house, knocking your little brother down on the floor, smacking your wife/girlfriend in the ass, and taking over control of YOUR TV. That said, if I see a pick that's on the other side of my own, especially one I really, really like and have put alot of time into, I take greater satisfaction (or dissapointment) in the outcome. Take no offense, Nick. Just some thoughts. :)
 
Last edited:

mack the knife

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2002
413
0
0
Nick might have meant to start his own thread and was reading yours when he hit reply rather than "new thread".

why do we always jump to the worst conclusions; even if he was fading you, whatever. Let your wallet do the talking....
 

LET'S EAT!!!

Registered User
Forum Member
May 6, 2002
1,156
0
0
56
Portland.OR.
again folks....

again folks....

nick can take care of himself......and mack-not a bad theory,but nick has been around here far too long to make a mistake like that my friend....hey,what the hell is so wrong with holding someone accountable for being a smart ass around here anyway??? for crying out loud!! mind your own god damn business.....bunch of bleeding heart bullshit.....the guy was being sarcastic....he knows it,you know it,i know it.....THE END....lets not try and drum up some scenarios that it was a mistake...????....dont insult my intelligence and dont make yourself look foolish by trying to make excuses for him :shrug:
 

Nick Douglas

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2000
3,688
15
0
48
Los Angeles, CA, USA
You guys were right about the Angels, congrats. Apologies for posting in your thread. For the record I did simply hit the wrong button.

As for your smack talking, it's not even worthy of a response until you guys actually post plays, keep an honest public record and consistently win. Once you do that, then you'll be at a level where I will feel you are worthy of having me respond to your unprovoked insults.

Love,
Nick
 

LET'S EAT!!!

Registered User
Forum Member
May 6, 2002
1,156
0
0
56
Portland.OR.
fair enough......

fair enough......

thanks for the apology nick....that was cool of you! sorry for going off with all the slams.....didnt think you would have made a mistake like that,truly thought you were trying to be sarcastic....my apology....good luck and go angels!!:thumb:
 

Nick Douglas

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2000
3,688
15
0
48
Los Angeles, CA, USA
LE,

I have found that simply apologizing when you are in the wrong is almost always the best way to cool down flame wars in the forum. I try not to make smart ass posts because I know it generally just starts a smack talking exhibition and the actual intelligent discussion is often left by the wayside.

I must admit that the Angels are an incredible team this season even though I am living in Southern California and really not a fan at all. I think mostly it is because there are so many front running Angels fans out there. I mean, this team was drawing 17,000 fans per game most of the season and now everyone I talk to seems to love them. There is a lot to love about the way the team plays, but one good example of bandwagon hopping is my roommate, who turned down FREE Angels tickets in early September two days in a row and now is such a huge fan that he paid $135 per ticket for yesterday's game and he is thinking of dropping four figures to go to the World Series.
 

gecko

Senior Lurker
Forum Member
Dec 7, 2001
2,469
0
0
parts unknown
Do you believe in Angels?

Do you believe in Angels?

"Bandwagon hopping" is nothing new in professional sports, but in the Angels' case, it just goes to show that for the past number of years, they have been a team without an identity. After the disappointments in the '80's and the malaise thereafter, it was natural for this franchise to lose some of its fanbase.

Not to mention the turnover in ownership from Autry family to the supposed family-oriented Disney corporation. The Rally Monkey, for all intents and purposes while whimsical, is a complete joke. Do you think, when it first appeared, that the players would embrace a furry little primate that jumps around as a symbol of its success?

It also goes to show that the general attitude of the fan population in southern California are along the lines of fickle, trendy....whatever you want to call it.

If Nick is correct and the average attendance at the Ed was only 17K early on, it's even more impressive how the fan base has grown/remerged, since Anaheim ending up averaging almost 28.5K for the year 2002. They've still got a ways to go to catch FOX's Dodgers, but they're on their way.

Even the Oakland A's and the Twins (yes, THE feel good story of the year, those Minnesota Twins) had lower average home attendance than the Halos this season. You really want to talk about disappointing? Look no further than the Detroit Tigers, a franchise rich with tradition. The owner only cares to spend $$$ on the hockey team, and it shows with a piss poor baseball club an average attendance of under 19K in a brand spanking new ballpark. That's sad.:(
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top