Baseball 2002 Quick Notes

Nick Douglas

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2000
3,688
15
0
48
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Some of the stuff I've looked at for the early part of the baseball season. Good luck this year, y'all.

-Public perception has Anaheim and New York Mets as two of the most improved teams. Anaheim has a pretty punchless lineup and New York has a good number of guys who struggle against left handed pitching, especially Burnitz.

-Last season Oakland, a young team who had surprising success the year before, really got out of the gate slow and was a good fade early. Minnesota may be in that same position this year, or perhaps Florida or Oakland again.

-Joe Morgan, in my opinion one of the sharpest baseball observers out there, chose Florida and the White Sox as sleeper teams to watch. He also indicated that White Sox, Yankees, Giants and Braves all look like division champions.

-Bullpens are a huge factor in the first part of the season. Pay very close attention to who has rested pens and who needs help. Generally a middle reliever over 50 pitches or a closer over 30 may not be as effective the next day. Pitching on the third consecutive day can also limit effectiveness.

-A pattern that existed last year was dogs being more profitable early while chalk was the better bet towards the end of the season. If course you can't use this unilaterally but it makes some sense since baseball teams often have unpredictable starts but once you get into September, the milk really separates from the fat.

-You have to think that the Royals will be energized by Sweeney's signing. They have very suspect starting pitching but I like their bullpen quite a bit.

-Chalk parlays and favorite run lines are two favorites of a lot of gamblers but be careful with those two. Run lines, especially when an ace is on the hill, are tough because teams usually get up against an ace. Each fave in a chalk parlay still has to be worth it from a value perspective for them to be good plays long term.

-Baltimore had a great spring, but looking at that team they may be the worst collection in the majors. Hargrove is a good enough manager to keep them from 100 losses most likely, but they are really poor.

-I personally feel that this year's Yankees team will take a step backward from last year's. They lost 4/9 of a lineup that won an awful lot of games over the last several years and they seemed to lose quite a bit of defense and team speed over the offseason. They also didn't address their one large weakness, the bullpen. Karsay is a decent addition, but I don't know if he is enough.

-Schilling and Johnson are amazing but at some point the Diamondbacks' age has to become a worry. I will be somewhat surprised if they can stay a step ahead of the Giants.

-Last year four teams stood out early as big moneymakers: Seattle, Cubs, Minnesota and Philadelphia. All four got pitching better than expected and had deep bullpens play very well. Who has a bullpen that could carry a decent rotation to early success this year? Maybe Detroit, Pittsburgh, Minnesota (again) or Boston.

-As far as my personal sleeper teams, I think Boston in the American League and (don't laugh) Pittsburgh in the National League will both be playoff teams. White Sox, A's and Mariners should fill out the A.L. while Phillies, Cards and Giants should fill out the N.L.
 

fletcher

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 21, 2000
16,136
9
0
63
henderson,nv.
anh is not a public choice,pitching and deff are the key to a good baseball team hitting is 3rd and angels have the first 2.

bost will do ok but there deff will be their downfall and bullpen.

twins will fight with tribe for 2nd behind wsox,pitching is above avg but teams without depth fade out in the 2nd half and twins showed that last year.

kc&det will rank up with balt&pitt. kc might have the thinest pitching staff in baseball from top to bottom ranks with pitt and balt.

sleeper watch rangers if they get alittle starting pitching

and for pittsburgh the best bullpin in the world can't help you if you are always behind when you go to it,pitt and balt could mix together and you couldnot make a contender. it will be a fight not to lose 100 for the bucs.

phil's young pitchers are not close to being prime time players will finish no higher then 3rd and i say 4th behind the marlins.

dbacks pitching will be fine off is where you have to worry.

cards win the national best overall team and bench hands down,much better without mac hitting 1 hr and k'ing his next 12 ab's.
 
Last edited:

neverteaseit

I'd pound it
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
5,075
28
0
60
Sunny Florida and Naptown
wow someone else who believes. funny you write this nick i also see pitt being a major player this year. but can't wager on total wins because of a few injuries that could happen they are very in some positions but they do look to have a good year this year if they stay healthy.
 

hoya

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 2, 2001
374
0
0
you dont think the yankees will make the playoffs??? wow, i hope your wrong. george would be awfully pissed if they dont even make the playoffs after spending all that money.
 

raz19

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 14, 2001
140
0
0
tx.
pirates??? u see who the openenig day starter is ??? villone???
desperation is what i see !!!! pirates ??? uh ...no!!!
 

JT

Degenerate
Forum Member
Mar 28, 2000
3,598
81
48
61
Ventura, Ca.
Wow Nick, I respect your opinion but not only does Pitt have no starting pitching but they have to improve in a tough division. 10 games if things totally break right but playoffs??? I see more possible upside in Milwaukee.
It will be between St Louis and Houston. Tino will help but a 8-10 game improvement is stretching it. JD Drew neds to stay healthy.
I doubt Giants will win the west. Personally, I think Colorado will improve by at least 10 games and will be a factor. No one mentions them. Arizona probably will repeat but like fletcher said offense is weak. Very weak. If Durazo is healthy they better write his name in the lineup ALL the time.
Braves I think will win the the East for the last time but Marlins are capable of giving them a run. People are expecting to much from Beckett. Will be a stud but remember, he is a very young pitcher. Burnett and Dempster need to find the polish Penny has for them to nail the east. Offense is so-so. Mets probably 2nd. Astacio if healthy will help alot. Need Alfonzo to come back also and not turn into Carlos Baerga. Mo Vaugn will probably hit no higher than .270 as he will get busted by fastballs all year long.
Of course a month into the season all these opinions are subject to change. :D
 
Last edited:

JT

Degenerate
Forum Member
Mar 28, 2000
3,598
81
48
61
Ventura, Ca.
Plus I agree with fletcher on Anaheim. Offense isn't great but if Salmon bounces back along with Erstad their offense will be good enough with their pitching and defense. :shrug:
 

Nick Douglas

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2000
3,688
15
0
48
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Thanks for the comments, guys.

-In my opinion Salmon is done. I don't see any real reason to expect the numbers he put up before 2000. Maybe Erstad will surprise me but I see a .300 guy at best. Bullpen is Levine and Percy and nobody else. I do like their starters a lot and they do have some decent defense. Still, that is a killer division and I see a big disappointment for the halos, new uniforms or not.

-Boston does have suspect defense, no doubt there. And their bullpen is full of guys who were solid at one point or another but not totally reliable. Still, I think their lineup is execptionally strong and I believe their bullpen will step up. Just a difference of opinion, I guess.

-I think fletcher hit the nail on the head with the Twins. Most teams in the league would kill for that pitching staff, but they are young and thin. Should be an above average year, but I just don't see them staying with the Sox.

-As far as the bad teams mentioned, KC, DET and BAL, all three look really bad. I love Weaver and Detroit finally looks healthy for the first time under Garner, but they should struggle. I kind of like some of the bats in Kansas City's lineup and their defense, but top to bottom they don't match up. I do feel Baltimore is the worst team in baseball.

-Rangers could be a sleeper if they get starting pitching, but I think all would agree that is a big "if". Gotta love that lineup, though.

-Phillies could very well finish fourth. That is a tough division to handicap. I think the young guys will show up this year and I think they have arguably the most complete everyday lineup in the NL top to bottom. I am giving them the nod for first, and maybe I will look foolish but I think that division is a four way toss up.

-I completely agree that the D-Backs worries are in the lineup and that the Cards are the best team in the NL. Cards just look very strong and it will be very surprising if they implode. Looking at the D-Backs lineup you have to wonder where they will get the runs all year long.

-As for the Pirates... I know it is an oddball pick but I really like what I see. Defense up the middle is as solid as they come with Reese and Wilson turning the DP and Adrian Brown covering a lot of ground in center. Rotation is full of young guys and 3 lefties which should make them competitive. The Bullpen is good and if Bensen comes back like people expect, he should be a number one starter. Time will tell, I guess. Maybe they will lose 110 games, you never know.

Good luck this season, all.
 

Lightning

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2002
2,322
14
38
55
Northwest of Philly, Pa
I agree that Baltimore and KC have some pretty bad pitching staffs but I think the Reds may be the 3rd worst ... at least starting pitching-wise. Graves is a good closer but the Reds starting 5 looks terrible to me. Pittsburgh may be the 4th worst but at least they have some young talent.

Being a huge Philly fan ... I can tell you that they do have the young talent to compete on a daily basis. Two major problems are the ongoing Rolen situation and how that will affect this young team and the fact that they do not have a solid #1 pitcher. Person is decent and would be a solid #2 guy but he has not looked good in Spring Traing. The future #1 is likely hard-throwing Brett Myers who pitched at Double A Reading last year and will start in Triple A Wilkesbarre-Scranton this year even though he impressed the organization big-time in the Spring. Brandon Duckworth IMO will eventually be the #2 starter ... #3 at worst behind Person. Randy Wolf is there solid lefty and will be a good #3 soon. Either Dave Coggin and Vincete Padilla will start get the #5 nod for now. Both throw hard but at times lack control like many young pitchers. The Phillies have been stockpiling young pitchers in throughout their minor league organizations so the future looks bright.

The lineup is very solid top to bottom and has many young players. Marlon Byrd is a five tool player who almost made the team. He plays CF and will likely take over for Glanville as early as later this year if Glanville struggles and Byrd lights up Triple A. I don't see the Rolen situation hurting the team as he is a quiet guy who will go about his business. C Mike Lieberthal and SS Jimmy Rollins are emerging the teams leaders now and they will hold this team together. I agree that they could finish 4th in what is a strong NL division but I could see them hanging in there at the end again with the Mets, Braves and Marlins.

Just some inside thoughts of a Philly fan with much hope at the moment. With a new stadium on the Horizon, I only wish they could find a way to keep Rolen as this team could be a force for some years.

Good Luck!
:p
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top