Biggest Joke Ever Seattle 7.5 pt favs

itevensout

Registered
Forum Member
Dec 24, 2014
18
0
0
Are you flipping kidding me. This hawks team is so overrated. Legion of Boom are you serious? Last year Seattle had a defensive passer rating of 63.39 which is almost unheard of. I am not sure how many teams have every been that good is pass defense. This year they bring in an 80. That is such a huge drop off considering the awful quarterbacks Seattle have played the last part of the season. The last 12 games they have faced these chumps. If you think this Seattle defense is anywhere near last years you are dreaming. Not even close. Eight out of 12 games they faced a team whose qb ended up ranked 20 or worse and the highest 13. So why is there defensive passer rating not even close to last year playing these chump qbs? They are not even close to the d as last year. Rodgers will have plenty of success passing the ball. They have a very balanced attack right now. I have the Pack winning the bowl for huge money. Playing them at plus 7.5 for my biggest bet ever. I think pack wins the game. To those who are betting the Hawks I am just saying the Hawks d is being hyped and in peoples minds they believe this is the Legion of Boom. It is not even close to last years defense. No way can I see the Hawks winning this by more than a TD. I know Rodgers is not as good on the road but he should have success against this overrated Hawks pass defense.
Rams (2) 23,24
Arizona (2) 28,100
Sf (2) Kaper ranked 20 and did not throw td all year in the fourth
Philly 18th
KC 13th
Oak 30th
Gmen 15th
Caro (2) 26th
 

Roger Baltrey

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 13, 2005
2,895
24
38
Whatever dude. No one has come close to them in 6 weeks. Great QB and best defense in the NFL.
 

sds222

Registered
Forum Member
Dec 31, 2006
2,937
12
0
Whatever dude. No one has come close to them in 6 weeks. Great QB and best defense in the NFL.

I think Seattle, somehow, is still being under valued. That is a team there and yes they commit too many penalties and Carroll is a douche but they get after it and Wilson has been fantastic. Rodgers is great and could pull off another stunner but overall, GB no where near this team IMO.
 

sds222

Registered
Forum Member
Dec 31, 2006
2,937
12
0
Any concerns about the fact that Rodgers is pretty immobile out there?

I don't see how he can do it again unless he gets some A-Rod treatment, if he does he deserves some serious props.
 

heleanth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 17, 2001
3,737
55
48
Northern Wisconsin
I can't see how Seattle is undervalued. If you look objectively at the Carolina game, you have to know that theyld have easily lost that game. The final score was not indicative of how close that game was. If Cam doesn't throw that terrible interception, who knows?

The only way Seattle beats GB is I'd the Packers turn the ball over like Carolina did. Rodgers is not (probably not) going to do that.

GB v NE.
 

Sportsaholic

Jack's Mentor
Forum Member
Jan 18, 2000
32,345
314
0
62
Crustacean Nation
The only way Seattle beats GB is I'd the Packers turn the ball over like Carolina did. Rodgers is not (probably not) going to do that.

GB v NE.


GB better hope the Dallas D shows up to play them again on Sunday....I doubt Seattle will be as passive attaching Rogers in the pocket as the Cowgirls were....:0008
 

sds222

Registered
Forum Member
Dec 31, 2006
2,937
12
0
The difference is Carolina has a very good defense that kept them in it, GB not so much. Sea should be able to run it all day, much like the Cowboys did. Only if Rodgers is healthy is this line off.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,388
227
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD
The difference is Carolina has a very good defense that kept them in it, GB not so much. Sea should be able to run it all day, much like the Cowboys did. Only if Rodgers is healthy is this line off.

Green Bay can play against the
run much differently against Seattle
than they could against Dallas cause Seattle doesn't have other skilled players who
catch the ball. packers had hands full with deZ and whitten. Seattle will have hands
full with packs offensive attack, if Newton was accurate the game was up for
grabs
 

sds222

Registered
Forum Member
Dec 31, 2006
2,937
12
0
Green Bay can play against the
run much differently against Seattle
than they could against Dallas cause Seattle doesn't have other skilled players who
catch the ball. packers had hands full with deZ and whitten. Seattle will have hands
full with packs offensive attack, if Newton was accurate the game was up for
grabs

Could be but Kearse and Baldwin have been making plays and they have to contain Wilson. Wilson is the key factor, guy has been brilliant but not getting as much credit as the other top QB's because they don't have to throw it 40 times for 400 yards and have a top defense.
This should be a great game, all I'm saying is that if Rodgers is hurt like last week I don't think he has nearly the same success. He got better in the second half but Dallas couldn't get to him. Hawks will bring four and if they are getting to him, which i think they will, GB in trouble, Lacy not enough in my opinion. Time will tell, I just hope I get back from nieces baptisim in time to see it, :toast:
 

az1

Registered
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2015
4
0
0
Under

Under

I see an under game. No turnovers for short fields. Packers running the ball more. Rodgers not being able to extend plays. First game Percy Harvin was a big factor. Packers still have a tough time stopping the run. Seattle big edge in special teams. The last two games with Rodgers injury they have come out with a steady diet of Eddie Lacy. I think the line is right on if anything tease Seattle with the Patriots. In the end I just think that Seattle will wear the Green Bay defense down with its running game.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,388
227
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD
Could be but Kearse and Baldwin have been making plays and they have to contain Wilson. Wilson is the key factor, guy has been brilliant but not getting as much credit as the other top QB's because they don't have to throw it 40 times for 400 yards and have a top defense. This should be a great game, all I'm saying is that if Rodgers is hurt like last week I don't think he has nearly the same success. He got better in the second half but Dallas couldn't get to him. Hawks will bring four and if they are getting to him, which i think they will, GB in trouble, Lacy not enough in my opinion. Time will tell, I just hope I get back from nieces baptisim in time to see it, :toast:

very true, containing Wilson is the key. I would also say dallas blew it lady week, they didnt capitalize because of mental mistakes
 

ldabdou

Chillaxin
Forum Member
Dec 28, 2004
9,304
58
48
Nor Cal
Sea 31-17. If Rogers was healthy this line would be 3. GB D wont be able to hold up and neither will Rogers...GL
 

tulah

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 10, 2003
3,470
15
38
So Cal
This game was dominated in week 1 by Seattle 36-16 . Why not again with a gimpy A.Rodgers vs the Seahawks Defense that will apply pressure all night.:shrug:. These DB"s get away with lots of no calls too. And they are at home.....again they are at home...
I'd be more comfy with the thought of GB hanging around if this was a 3-4 pt spread.
When the line dropped at Seattle -7.5 the books are begging for for GB money which leads me to think that the Packers have no shot at all to make this a close game.
IMO Seattle by 14+:0074
GB run Defense will be exposed again. Seattle will run the rock. They do it well consistently week in and out.
GB will struggle to stop it. GB was very average on the road and struggled versus good defenses and lost to @Buffalo, @Detroit , @Seattle.
Seahawks are favored by a TD for a good reason
 

Shleprock

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2007
1,594
29
0
Actually game was closer than score. Packer defense thanks to brad jones kept 4 drives going because of 15 yard penalties. Another mistake was running into punter gave seattle a first down.Jordy nelson had a ball bounce off his hands that was intercepted. Starting right tackle left game first half. With him out backup gave up a sack on 4th down attempt in seattle territory. He also got beat bad on a sack that resulted in a safety. On to lb brad jones who at the time was a starter. On lynch td run 5 yards into run jones tried to tackle him high lynch bounced off him ran for a touchdown. Jones and Aj hawk were manhandled and pushed 10 yards downfield on running plays. Jones now a backup and hawk gets way less playing time. Packers had a rookie at center making first start. Clinton dix and devonteAdams also rookies have made great strides.percy harvin had a big game runs on jet sweep and over 100 passing yards is gone.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
Could be but Kearse and Baldwin have been making plays and they have to contain Wilson. Wilson is the key factor, guy has been brilliant but not getting as much credit as the other top QB's because they don't have to throw it 40 times for 400 yards and have a top defense.
This should be a great game, all I'm saying is that if Rodgers is hurt like last week I don't think he has nearly the same success. He got better in the second half but Dallas couldn't get to him. Hawks will bring four and if they are getting to him, which i think they will, GB in trouble, Lacy not enough in my opinion. Time will tell, I just hope I get back from nieces baptisim in time to see it, :toast:

good point...in the fantasy football era guys like Wilson seem to get short shrift when people talk about great qbs.....make no mistake,the guy is special...as in a budding great...if his career continues on this trajectory and the team wins another super bowl or two during his career(much more likely than not,imo),I`ll be curious to see if his lack of eye-popping stats could keep him out of the h.o.f......

I`m a big Rodgers fan and hope the mofo gets the mvp(it would be well deserved,imo)......but I think Wilson is also special...not in an eye-popping stat sort of way....but in a "the guy is just plain a winner playing with the best defense in football getting the ball back for him" kind of way....he makes his pedestrian receivers incrementally better because of his ability to buy time on routes and the fact that the threat of his running occupies defenses.......I`m sure the seattle gameplan will be to keep Rodgers on the sideline for long stretches...

nobody in their right mind wants to play seattle this time of year...especially in seattle...

all that said,that hook is bothersome....
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top