Brown Pays Daughter $9,500!

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
http://articles.boston.com/2012-02-...aign-finance-campaign-events-campaign-manager

Typical Republican stealing from the coffers.
No wonder they dont need welfare!

Family members often help out on campaigns, stuffing envelopes, making phone calls, and smiling on stage. Usually, it?s for free.

Senator Scott Brown?s campaign has spent $9,500 since December 2010 to pay his daughter to sing at three campaign events, including a pair of Christmas parties.

Ayla Brown, a performer and a onetime ?American Idol?? contestant, has been part of Brown?s appeal since he won a special election in 2010.

Brown, a Republican, is now locked in a tight race against Elizabeth Warren, the likely Democratic nominee. His payments to his daughter appear in his campaign finance reports as disbursements to Ambient Entertainment LLC, Ayla Brown?s representative
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
It will take many years if ever to work through Bush?s failed policy?s, so yes we will still be able to blame G.W.Bush for many years to come. Solyndra, well, the Bush administration also gave Solyndra millions of $?s..so yea we can blame W for that as well.

...............................................................


well just ouch .....

:0008
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Bush's silence may be motivated by the recognition that much of the public doesn't like him. He left office with the worst approval rating for a president since Watergate.

In the short term, the two things that will dominate popular memories of Bush are the credit crunch and the Iraq War. John Bolton, Bush's ambassador to the UN, admitted this week that his former employer had left Obama "a mess" to clean up. That's an understatement. To be fair, Bush himself faced some events beyond his control: a recession in 2001 and the global collapse of financial institutions in 2007-2008. Nevertheless, on his watch median household income fell, poverty rose and millions lost health insurance. One particularly ugly stat: In 2000 there were 11.6 million children living in poverty in the United States, but by 2008 that number had swelled to 14.1 million.

Meanwhile, billions of dollars and thousands of lives were lost in the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Even so, the future of democracy in both countries remains uncertain. In the course of "rooting out terrorism," civil liberties were compromised. If you like your government limited and cautious -- in the style of Thomas Jefferson or Ron Paul -- Bush wasn't your kind of a conservative.

However, as memories fade and new reasons to be angry take their place, Bush's time in office might start to look comparatively benign. The economic figures might have been bad when Bush left the White House, but they've only gotten worse. Total debt was nearly $11 trillion in January 2009, when Obama took office, and it's more than $15 trillion today. In January 2009, unemployment was 7.8% and, after hitting a high of 10% in October 2009, is down to 8.1%.

People might not have reason to be nostalgic about Bush, but Obama hasn't yet delivered all that change he promised. Moreover, his foreign policy -- although involving fewer boots on the ground -- has dramatically expanded the definition of the enemy and the tools available to fight them. In the wake of the discovery of a creepy "Kill List," a number of liberal journalists have written that Obama is actually less ethical or constitutionally minded than his predecessor. Bush might have tortured enemy combatants, but Obama has targeted U.S. citizens identified as terrorists.

Still, historical distance from Bush's presidency will let us put it in greater perspective. Subjective bad memories will be replaced by objective analysis. And, objectively, he was a very important president.

In foreign affairs, Bush defined the War on Terror in much the way that Truman shaped thinking about the struggle against communism for decades. After 9/11, Bush could have determined the threat to America to be a limited terrorist opposition centered on al Qaeda. Instead, he defined it as a grand existential conflict between democracy and radical Islam: a clash of civilizations. Many may argue that his analysis was flawed, but many in the West also bought it - -witness Britain's participation in Iraq and Afghanistan and France's ban on the Burqa.:scared :SIB

On Bush's watch a consensus developed that Islamic extremism must be confronted. More importantly, the idea that the West would support democracy, regardless of the cost -- that the age of the great dictators was over - probably shaped the popular risings that took place across the Middle East in 2010-11. Would there have been an Arab Spring without an Iraq war? Maybe not.

At home, Bush was surprisingly innovative, too. He spoke Spanish and attracted unusual numbers of Latino votes. He appointed two black secretaries of State and a Chinese-American secretary of Labor. He also gave to the right the concept of compassionate conservatism: the idea that instead of simply pushing for less government, the Republicans should offer constructive proposals for what should take its place.

A result is that the one place in the world where Bush is guaranteed a good reception is Africa. In 2003, just 50,000 Africans were on anti-retrovival drugs. Thanks to the $18 billion in aid that Bush pumped into the continent, the figure had risen to 1.3 million people by 2007.

....................................................................

Bush was the worst president in American history.

We are just now recovering from this fool.
..................................................................

Time will tell. I will always remember him for the 'pre-emptive' attack on Iraq claiming Sadaam Hussein had 'weapons of mass destruction' of which he had none. This was followed by the "Patriot Act" (which was anything but patriotic), water boarding and the elimination of habeas corpus.


...................................................................
"Bush's silence may be motivated by the recognition that much of the public doesn't like him. " haha...really? Yes, it could be that or possibly he got a "Bushisms" calendar for Christmas.
...............................................................



If those who celebrate Bush continue to follow along like good sheep and elect Romney, it won't much matter because this country will be a corporate owned fascist state.

.................................................................


we should just give the fawk up anyways
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
we should just give the fawk up anyways

My efforts are dedicated to more useful issues now, unfortunately, with the temps getting to and staying in the 110's + daily, outdoor work is from 0400 to 0800 or 0900. Then do some stuff indoors.

This country has turned into a bunch of apathetic, myopic dolts.

Otherwise known as a bunch of Raymonds
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
29,133
1,755
113
51
Earth
www.ffrf.org
It will take many years if ever to work through Bush?s failed policy?s, so yes we will still be able to blame G.W.Bush for many years to come. Solyndra, well, the Bush administration also gave Solyndra millions of $?s..so yea we can blame W for that as well.

...............................................................


well just ouch .....

:0008

:0corn
 

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
WOW.

I am no fan of Bush but after 3+ years and $5.5 Trillion, record monthly deficit spending, you still want to blame it on Bush?

Goes to show, most people deserve what they get.


Answer me this.....when was the last time a federal budget was passed?
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
29,133
1,755
113
51
Earth
www.ffrf.org
WOW.

I am no fan of Bush but after 3+ years and $5.5 Trillion, record monthly deficit spending, you still want to blame it on Bush?

I will absolutely continue to blame Bush. How can you discount that the dude put us in a recession/depression? Seriously, how? Obama has been filibustered to death on everything he tries to do and you blame him. The Republicans tried to ruin the country via wars we couldn't afford, now they choke the life out of every recovery plan the Dems throw out there....and then they blame Obama for not doing anything. What a fucking joke.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
I will absolutely continue to blame Bush. How can you discount that the dude put us in a recession/depression? Seriously, how? Obama has been filibustered to death on everything he tries to do and you blame him. The Republicans tried to ruin the country via wars we couldn't afford, now they choke the life out of every recovery plan the Dems throw out there....and then they blame Obama for not doing anything. What a fucking joke.

..............................................................

pretty much my feelings exactly

pity really

Willard would be a horrible President

If I cant have Ron Paul then I will take Obama to pull America out of this quandry.
 

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
You claim that Congress has filibustered Obama yet Obama had a supermajority in the SENATE when he was first elected.

Take a look at the congressional make-up under Bush - I think at most, it was 55 R to 45 D in the Senate.

And (D) controlled the House in 2007 and at some point, I think the Senate was 50-50.

You can look to blame Bush for whatever you want - it is short-sighted and ignorant, in my honest opinion.

The deficit has swelled under both Bush and Obama but it has been far worse under Obama.

Under Obama, (D) held both the House and the Senate and still did not pass a budget.

At some point, the buck stops with O and you can not keep blaming the past.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
I guess Bush is to BLAME for all of the Worlds financial problems, Greece, Spain, Italy, Bush had too much POWER.

:facepalm:

Do you blame Obama for that?

They are both to blame. Bush for starting it and Obama for not being strong enough to clean it up.They are cut from the same cloth. And Romney is not any better.
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,293
1,466
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Do you blame Obama for that?

They are both to blame. Bush for starting it and Obama for not being strong enough to clean it up.They are cut from the same cloth. And Romney is not any better.

If you believe the Democrats, Bush is to BLAME for it all, somehow Obama , Pelosi and Reid are Teflon Coated.

:0074
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top