Like following your picks, was wondering something. I know you talk about finding the right bait. You've made many a pick because the line is too good to be true. Kind of like Seton Hall last night in my opinion, 9 gm streak and getting 13 pts. Too good to be true, yet they get blown out. But I believe that all that goes out the window in tourneys. I think that betting nothing but dogs is the way to go. What do you think? Do you use the same philosophy or do you have another strategy in tourneys. And does it matter if it's conference tourney or ncaa tourney.
Sorry lengthy, but would like to know.