Bush secretly funding Al Qaeda

[Spytheweb]

The one good thing about Bush is that he will be out of office in less than 2 years. So any damage he's going to do to America, he better hurry up, the clock is ticking.


http://www.ichblog.eu/index.php?option=com_seyret&task=videodirectlink&id=368

 

[gardenweasel]

bush funding al qaeda,eh?.....:142smilie

what would be suitable response for a primo,spittle and vitriol laden stw gem of a post?.....

a song!!......a classic!!!

They're Coming to Take Me Away, Ha-haaa!


Remember when you ran away
And I got on my knees
And begged you not to leave
Because I'd go berserk?
Well. . .

You left me anyhow
And then the days got worse and worse
And now you see I've gone
Completely out of my mind
And. . .

They're coming to take me away, HA HA
They're coming to take me away, HO HO HEE HEE HA HA
To the funny farm
Where life is beautiful all the time
And I'll be happy to see
Those nice, young men
In their clean, white coats
And they're coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!

You thought it was a joke
And so you laughed
You laughed when I had said
That losing you would make me flip my lid
Right. . .

You know you laughed, I heard you laugh
You laughed, you laughed and laughed
And then you left
But now you know I'm utterly mad!
And. . .

They're coming to take me away, HA HA
They're coming to take me away, HO HO HEE HEE HA HA
To the happy home
With trees and flowers and chirping birds
And basket weavers who sit and smile
And twiddle their thumbs and toes
And they're coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!

I cooked your food
I cleaned your house
And this is how you pay me back
For all my kind, unselfish loving deeds?!
Hah. . .

Well you just wait
They'll find you yet
And when they do they'll
Put you in the ASPCA, you mangy mutt!
And. . .

They're coming to take me away, HA HA
They're coming to take me away, HO HO HEE HEE HA HA
To the funny farm
Where life is beautiful all the time
And I'll be happy to see
Those nice, young men
In their clean, white coats
And they're coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!

To the happy home
With trees and flowers and chirping birds
And basket weavers who sit and smile
And twiddle their thumbs and toes
And they're coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!

To the funny farm
Where life is beautiful all the time
And I'll be happy to see
Those nice, young men
In their clean, white coats
And they're coming to take me away, Ha-haaa!..........


stw=single cell organism........unfortunately,it`s obviously not a brain cell......

 

[marine]

you know, for all the freaks that think bush is the antichrist..... and keep talking about how happy they are he will be out of office in 2 years or so...

If he was really that dirty and out to ruin america - dont you think he would change the laws to let himself stay president indefinitely?
Sadly, I have not seen that conspiracy yet - but rest assured, I am sure some idiot will put together a blog about it now.

 

[The Sponge]

you know, for all the freaks that think bush is the antichrist..... and keep talking about how happy they are he will be out of office in 2 years or so...

If he was really that dirty and out to ruin america - dont you think he would change the laws to let himself stay president indefinitely?
Sadly, I have not seen that conspiracy yet - but rest assured, I am sure some idiot will put together a blog about it now.

What is really scary is the inability to see a con job right in front of your face. Since Olberman said this i would lay my money on it that it is true. I mean we are talking about a guy who tried to orchestrate the selling of our ports to the Arabs. I guess we forgot about that. Must have been another fairy tale the blinded missed out on.

 

[StevieD]

No doubt that Bush is the best friend the terrorists have. His policy has created a a great recruitment tool for them.

 

[Jabberwocky]

The source of this story:

Seymour Myron "Sy" Hersh (born April 8, 1937 Chicago) is an American Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalist and author based in Washington, DC. He is a regular contributor to The New Yorker magazine on military and security matters.


http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070305fa_fact_hersh

This is not a whack job liberal blogger. Anyone who is shocked by this has no fvcking understanding of what we have been doing in this region for decades.

 

[Chadman]

Yeah, why is this such a big deal? I mean, it's not like we are supporting Saddam against Iran under the table or anything, right? Right?

 

[JCDunkDogs]

Heh, what a joke. Bin Laden getting support from the U.S. and its allies. Oh...

 

[Jabberwocky]

any response from you neo nitwits?

 

[The Sponge]

any response from you neo nitwits?

Weasal gave you the classic neo nitwit response. He laughs out loud, does absolutely no research on the topic, and then will call a person a conspiracy theorist or a moonbat while running with his own (MSM) conspiracy theory calling it a fact. Or the other neo Nitwit will call it a liberal Blog article, do no research, and most likely blame Bill Clinton

 

[bjfinste]

No doubt that Bush is the best friend the terrorists have. His policy has created a a great recruitment tool for them.

I do agree that this is very true.

 

[DZL]

wait a minute - i thought bush was a big dummy -

for being such a dummy, he sure can pull off a ton of conspiracies without getting caught!

what a dummy!

 

[shamrock]

this should surprise nobody, Bush & Cheney have been crying for months about Iran funding the Shiite Muslims in Iraq. However they have never mumbled a syllable about Saudi Arabia using millions and millions to support the Sunni' s.

The Shiite (Iran, Hezbollah), are clearly the bigger fish now, why not fund Sunni insurgents, and Al queda? It's what the Republicans always do, don't you remember Iran Contra, or funding OBL to fight the Russians. its classic Republican warfare.

 

[bryanz]

Every day in America we go to the pumps and support Saudi Arabia and terrorist around the world. For us as a Country to send billions into a region that we are at war with makes no sense. Our President is the first to stand up on his box and tell us, we are at war, but he has done nothing to slow down the aid to our enemy. This is very simple / no conspiracy here. This can not be disputed. If Our President is willing to put troops on the ground in Iraq, why doesn't he, cut off the flow of American money into the region that aides the enemy every single day in the destruction of American Life ? We are all to Blame. We have elected people that have not done their jobs . I put $60 in my truck today, Americans will die in Iraq today, you can't make this shit up. Where is the common sense and leadership ?

 

[JCDunkDogs]

Those are all good points. This is a strange war..."We" as a country are at war, but almost none of "us" as individuals is making a personal sacrifice. Where is the gas rationing, where are the metal drives? Or their modern equivalent? (Carpools, carpool lanes, alternative energy programs, etc.)

Bill Maher says it humorously in his book title, "He That Rides Alone, Rides With Bin Laden."

 

[gardenweasel]

The source of this story:

Seymour Myron "Sy" Hersh (born April 8, 1937 Chicago) is an American Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalist and author based in Washington, DC. He is a regular contributor to The New Yorker magazine on military and security matters.


http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070305fa_fact_hersh

This is not a whack job liberal blogger. Anyone who is shocked by this has no fvcking understanding of what we have been doing in this region for decades.

you mean seymour"my lai/abu ghraib" hersh?........this guy is known for having the world`s biggest phone directory of "unnamed sources"....

"top pentagon officers ... senior commanders ... unidentified u.s. military officials"....

lol

that`s see-more...

no not a whack job blogger...a whack job anti-american,nyt`s contributor......

why`d you leave out the fact that he often works for the nyt`s?........when trying to make the case that hersh is objective on bush and the administration,that is a bit embarrassing,ain`t it?...

it may be worth pointing out that "see-more" was the same tard-ass who wrote "the samson option", the book that "exposed" israel's nuke program and demanded that the west put a stop to it.....

ironically, this moonbat doesn't feel that nuclear proliferation is a problem with iran....you see, oppressive tyrannical regimes are allowed to have nukes.....peaceful western democracies are not....

stevie:""No doubt that Bush is the best friend the terrorists have. His policy has created a a great recruitment tool for them.""

lol

hirsh also wrote the article on the """leak"''saying that bombing iran`s nuclear facilities would not destroy iran`s nuclear program...

well,guess what my fellow americans?... regardless of whether bombing iranian nuclear facilities would destroy iran’s nuclear program or not, why is the the "new yorker" magazine telling iran that "top pentagon officers have told the bush administration that bombing iranian nuclear facilities would probably fail to destroy that country’s nuclear program?"

any one of you beauties with 2 i.q. points to rub together realizes that THIS kind of seditious shit encourages iran....

question...why would the new yorker magazine and hersh want to encourage iran to continue its nuclear program?

(ans: they really hate us.)

make sense?...obviously to bds sufferers it doesn`t...

i can understand not liking bush but, does hatred of the man dictate that the haters help destroy this nation's military and, ultimately, this nation?

apparently it does to idiots like hersh...

hersh will write anything, true or not, which he believes will have a negative impact upon the u.s and bush...

this guy needs to find a country he likes and go live there,.....

btw...a new slew of stw defenders.....noted(i feel naseous)

a strong bleachy odor in this thread...wocky,time to wash your mustache..

 

[kosar]

Give it a rest, weasel.

Iran doesn't need the NYT or Hersh to tell them that their nuclear program would not be destroyed by us (or Israel) bombing them.

'seditious.' :mj07: Whatever.

BTW- Most, if not all, journalists protect their sources.

 

[gardenweasel]

Give it a rest, weasel.

Iran doesn't need the NYT or Hersh to tell them that their nuclear program would not be destroyed by us (or Israel) bombing them.

'seditious.' :mj07: Whatever.

BTW- Most, if not all, journalists protect their sources.

i personally don`t know whether we could destroy it or not....that said, there are a lot of targets in iran, and a lot of people currently above ground who could be put under.....do a bosnia/clinton number on `em....

it wouldn't do them much good to have an intact nuclear research facility without the electricity to even turn on the lights in the underground chambers, or without the scientists, technicians, or bosses to further their efforts....

take out their command and control, their "air force", their "stealth" missiles (which unfortunately for iran don't have "stealth" launch pads), their entire air defense systems and cluster bomb the hell out of the revolutionary guard....
.
then just watch to see what "tunnels" and deep bunkers they run to (or just follow the electric power lines to them) then blow them up or bomb them so no one gets in and no one gets out....

rinse and repeat as necessary....



as far as the "unnmaed sources"...not all are famous(or infamous) for this little "trait"...as hersh is...

WIKPEDIA...

Use of anonymous sources
""Hersh makes frequent reference to anonymous sources in his reporting; some have criticized this usage, implying that some of these sources are unreliable or even made up. In a review of Hersh's book, "Chain of Command", commentator Amir Taheri wrote, "As soon as he has made an assertion he cites a "source" to back it. In every case this is either an un-named former official or an unidentified secret document passed to Hersh in unknown circumstances... By my count Hersh has anonymous 'sources' inside 30 foreign governments and virtually every department of the US government." [19]

David Remnick, the editor of the New Yorker, maintains that he is aware of the identity of all of Hersh's unnamed sources, telling the Columbia Journalism Review that "I know every single source that is in his pieces.... Every 'retired intelligence officer,' every general with reason to know, and all those phrases that one has to use, alas, by necessity, I say, 'Who is it? What's his interest?' We talk it through." [20]

(there`s a shocker)

In a response to an article in the New Yorker in which Hersh alleged that the U.S. government was planning a strike on Iran, U.S. Defense Department spokesman Brian Whitman said, "This reporter has a solid and well-earned reputation for making dramatic assertions based on thinly sourced, unverifiable anonymous sources."[21]"""

i don`t make this stuff up...unlike hersh...

 

[Jabberwocky]

Once again an incoherent rant with nothing of substance to respond to. He protects his sources, and he has written for the NY Times. Wow, you really destroyed his credibility there. Your familiar theme is so tiresome. If you are not pumping out propaganda for the Bush admin then you hate freedom and America. Total inane drivel. GW, YOU are the one that hates freedom.

 

[Jabberwocky]

You are using Taheri to undermine Hersh's credibility? :mj07:

Here is quip about your boy from the same source.

"Taheri's public speaking engagements are arranged by Benador Associates, a public relations firm with a predominantly neoconservative clientele.

It has been alleged, credibly, that he is in fact a front for pro-Israel ideologues to publish self-serving material about Iran, under the cover of an Iranian author."

Its ok GW. I get it. You like to live in the world of propaganda without the troublesome interference of a free press. Makes life easier. Too tough to tell who the bad guys are in a diverse free thinking
world.