I spent the wee hours of the night compiling this head to head match up. Tirelessly working through this as a devout MadJack's contributor. I apologize in advance if any grammatical mistakes .
Here’s a detailed breakdown of Carson Beck’s performance this season (2025) in big moments and situational splits — especially in clutch situations like 3rd/4th quarters, versus ranked teams, and other key contexts.
📈 Performance vs. Ranked Opponents
Beck has been very effective against ranked teams this season:
2025 Stats vs AP Top 25 teams
Completion %: 75.4 %
Passing yards: 1,053
Touchdowns: 12
Interceptions: 3
Passer Rating: 182.5
These splits indicate he’s elevated his play in marquee matchups, showing strong accuracy and scoring production against top competition. �
ESPN.com
⏱️ Quarter-by-Quarter Situational Stats
Beck’s performance in different portions of games shows how he handles pressure and closing situations:
First Half vs Second Half
1st Half: 71 % completion, 14 TDs, 4 INTs, 165.15 rating
2nd Half: 79.6 % completion, 11 TDs, 6 INTs, 166.61 rating
He’s even more efficient in the second half — which can be crucial in close games. �
CFB Stats
By Quarter
1st Quarter: 80.4 %, 6 TD, 0 INT, 181.67 rating
2nd Quarter: 63.0 %, 8 TD, 4 INT, 151.08 rating
3rd Quarter: 83.1 %, 7 TD, 2 INT, 185.49 rating
4th Quarter: 76.5 %, 4 TD, 3 INT, 148.95 rating
Key trends:
Strong starts and third quarters — great for building leads or flipping momentum.
Fourth quarter is good but not elite compared to the third — a few more turnovers relative to production late in games. �
CFB Stats
💡 Big Game Situations
Here are some hallmark performances and moments this year:
🔹 Standout Big Wins
vs No. 19 Florida State (road game): Beck threw 4 TDs in a 28–22 victory over a ranked rival — a signature performance. �
Fox Sports
vs NC State: Passed for 291 yards and 3 TDs in a dominant 41–7 win, even though N.C. State wasn’t ranked, the game had playoff impact. �
CBS Sports
🔸 Tough Spotlight Moments
Upset loss to Louisville: He threw 4 interceptions with 0 TDs in a 24–21 home loss, significantly impacting Miami’s season trajectory. �
Fox Sports
This game remains one of the most glaring “big going wrong” examples — Beck’s turnovers directly swung the result and ended Miami’s undefeated run. �
New York Post
🔥 Clutch & Second-Half Metrics
✔ Beck’s second-half completion % and rating tick up — suggesting he makes adjustments and executes better as games progress. �
✔ He leads Power Four QBs in quick release time (~2.35 seconds), which helps him avoid pressure in critical moments. �
CFB Stats
Houston Chronicle
🧠 How to Interpret These Trends
✅ Strengths
Performs well against elite competition — high passer rating and good touchdown production. �
ESPN.com
Very good in early and middle parts of games to build momentum. �
CFB Stats
Bonus: strong second-half efficiency often helps extend drives late. �
CFB Stats
⚠ Areas of Concern
Turnovers in key late-game moments (4th quarter) can be costly — as illustrated in the Louisville loss. �
Fox Sports
While his 4th quarter numbers are solid, they’re not as elite as his performance earlier in games. �
CFB Stats
🏆 Summary
Carson Beck in big games (2025):
⭐ Excellent vs ranked opponents with elite passer rating and TD production. �
ESPN.com
⭐ Improves in second half/third quarter, showing coaching and on-field adjustments. �
CFB Stats
⚠ Turnovers in 4th quarter / critical moments are the main blemish on his big–game resume so far.
Marcel Reed Texas A&M
Here’s a detailed breakdown of Texas A&M QB Marcel Reed’s 2025 performance in key situational contexts — especially third-down performance, clutch moments (3rd/4th quarter), and performance in high-leverage situations:
🏈 Third-Down Performance — Passing & Rushing Impact
📊 Passing Third-Down Splits (2025)
According to official situational passing stats:
Overall third-down passing
12 games: 35 completions on 72 attempts → 48.6 % conversion
459 yards, 4 TDs, 3 INTs, 112.2 passer rating
These numbers show a lag compared to A&M’s overall completion % (61.8 %) and rating, indicating struggles converting consistently on third downs through the air. �
CFB Stats
Third-down breakdown by distance:
1–3 yd: 54.5 % (modest efficiency)
4–6 yd: 45.5 %, 2 TDs (high reward when successful)
7–9 yd: 47.6 %
10+ yd: 50 %
These splits suggest situational inconsistency — while efficiency is okay on longer throws, short-to-medium yardage is often a challenge, especially under pressure. �
CFB Stats
🏃 Rushing on Third Down
Reed also contributes with his legs:
3rd Down rushing (all): 11 attempts, 23 yards — 2.0 YPC with 1 TD
Gains are modest overall but valuable when they come — especially short-to-medium situations and conversions. �
CFB Stats
📌 What This Means
📉 Passing conversions on third down are below elite marks, suggesting Reed sometimes struggles to consistently keep drives alive through the air. �
CFB Stats
🤝 Rushing adds a complementary element, giving A&M a dual-threat option that defenses must respect, but it’s not a dominant third-down rushing edge overall. �
CFB Stats
Context — Outside Analysis:
Recent previews note A&M’s offense and Reed face scrutiny on third downs, with completion performance under center described as a relative weakness compared to elite QBs this season. �
State of The U
🔥 Clutch Moments — 3rd & 4th Quarters
📊 Situational Passing by Quarter (2025, ESPN splits)
While full situational splits by quarter from ESPN aren’t shown in every detail, we do know:
Performance vs AP Top 25:
Completion %: 58.0 %
963 passing yards
6 TDs, 5 INTs, 134.2 passer rating
This shows efficiency dips in big moments but Reed still generates scoring impact vs top teams. �
ESPN.com
📍 Notable Clutch Performances
Big Comeback vs South Carolina (Week 12)
Trailed by 27 points at half → Reed finished with 439 passing yards, 3 TDs.
Second half: 16/20 for 298 yards, all 3 passing scores in the third quarter, and led the winning drive early in the 4th.
Also converted third-down with an 8-yard run during the clinching drive. �
WTOP News
This game exemplifies Reed’s potential as a high-ceiling clutch performer — turning a massive deficit into a historic comeback, particularly in the third quarter and early fourth quarter. �
WTOP News
⚖ Performance in Close & High-Leverage Situations
📊 Passing Splits by Score Margin
From situational data:
Winning by 1–7: 59.2 % comp, 739 yards, 6 TDs, 2 INTs, 134.8 rating
Tied games: ~66.1 % comp, 458 yards, 5 TDs — favorable efficiency
Losing by small margins: lower comp %, but still respectable ratings
This suggests Reed doesn’t collapse in tight games but doesn’t always elevate to elite efficiency either. �
CFB Stats
🧠 Red-Zone Performance
Inside opponents’ 20: 56.8 % comp with 12 TDs, 3 INTs, rating ~166.8 — this shows inside-the-red-zone scoring aggressiveness and results sometimes outweigh efficiency. �
CFB Stats
🧩 Narrative Summary — Clutch & Situational Takeaways
📈 What Reed Does Well
✔ Explosive third-quarter production: Career-best moments, especially in comeback scenarios. �
✔ Red-zone scoring presence: High touchdown output shows an ability to finish drives when close to the end zone. �
✔ Dual-threat option: Adds rushing facets to key conversions and drives. �
WTOP News
CFB Stats
CFB Stats
📉 Areas of Relative Weakness
⚠ Third-down passing efficiency is suboptimal: Under 50 % conversion indicates struggles to sustain drives consistently through the air. �
⚠ Big-game passing efficiency dips vs ranked teams: Lower completion % and passer rating reflect inconsistency under pressure. �
CFB Stats
ESPN.com
📊 Clutch Performance Pattern
Reed has episodic elite stretch play — as seen in historic comeback against South Carolina where he nearly single-handedly flipped the game. �
WTOP News
However, consistency in converting third downs and late-game execution through the air is still a developing aspect of his game. �
CFB Stats
🏁 Overall Situational Snapshot
Situational Category
Performance Level
Third-Down Passing
Below average efficiency (48.6 %) �
CFB Stats
Third-Down Rushing
Modest but useful �
CFB Stats
Clutch Scoring Moments
High-variance — elite in some games �
WTOP News
Vs Ranked Teams
Moderate with turnovers �
ESPN.com
Red-Zone Passing
Effective scoring presence �
CFB Stats
Here’s a detailed breakdown of Carson Beck’s performance this season (2025) in big moments and situational splits — especially in clutch situations like 3rd/4th quarters, versus ranked teams, and other key contexts.
📈 Performance vs. Ranked Opponents
Beck has been very effective against ranked teams this season:
2025 Stats vs AP Top 25 teams
Completion %: 75.4 %
Passing yards: 1,053
Touchdowns: 12
Interceptions: 3
Passer Rating: 182.5
These splits indicate he’s elevated his play in marquee matchups, showing strong accuracy and scoring production against top competition. �
ESPN.com
⏱️ Quarter-by-Quarter Situational Stats
Beck’s performance in different portions of games shows how he handles pressure and closing situations:
First Half vs Second Half
1st Half: 71 % completion, 14 TDs, 4 INTs, 165.15 rating
2nd Half: 79.6 % completion, 11 TDs, 6 INTs, 166.61 rating
He’s even more efficient in the second half — which can be crucial in close games. �
CFB Stats
By Quarter
1st Quarter: 80.4 %, 6 TD, 0 INT, 181.67 rating
2nd Quarter: 63.0 %, 8 TD, 4 INT, 151.08 rating
3rd Quarter: 83.1 %, 7 TD, 2 INT, 185.49 rating
4th Quarter: 76.5 %, 4 TD, 3 INT, 148.95 rating
Key trends:
Strong starts and third quarters — great for building leads or flipping momentum.
Fourth quarter is good but not elite compared to the third — a few more turnovers relative to production late in games. �
CFB Stats
💡 Big Game Situations
Here are some hallmark performances and moments this year:
🔹 Standout Big Wins
vs No. 19 Florida State (road game): Beck threw 4 TDs in a 28–22 victory over a ranked rival — a signature performance. �
Fox Sports
vs NC State: Passed for 291 yards and 3 TDs in a dominant 41–7 win, even though N.C. State wasn’t ranked, the game had playoff impact. �
CBS Sports
🔸 Tough Spotlight Moments
Upset loss to Louisville: He threw 4 interceptions with 0 TDs in a 24–21 home loss, significantly impacting Miami’s season trajectory. �
Fox Sports
This game remains one of the most glaring “big going wrong” examples — Beck’s turnovers directly swung the result and ended Miami’s undefeated run. �
New York Post
🔥 Clutch & Second-Half Metrics
✔ Beck’s second-half completion % and rating tick up — suggesting he makes adjustments and executes better as games progress. �
✔ He leads Power Four QBs in quick release time (~2.35 seconds), which helps him avoid pressure in critical moments. �
CFB Stats
Houston Chronicle
🧠 How to Interpret These Trends
✅ Strengths
Performs well against elite competition — high passer rating and good touchdown production. �
ESPN.com
Very good in early and middle parts of games to build momentum. �
CFB Stats
Bonus: strong second-half efficiency often helps extend drives late. �
CFB Stats
⚠ Areas of Concern
Turnovers in key late-game moments (4th quarter) can be costly — as illustrated in the Louisville loss. �
Fox Sports
While his 4th quarter numbers are solid, they’re not as elite as his performance earlier in games. �
CFB Stats
🏆 Summary
Carson Beck in big games (2025):
⭐ Excellent vs ranked opponents with elite passer rating and TD production. �
ESPN.com
⭐ Improves in second half/third quarter, showing coaching and on-field adjustments. �
CFB Stats
⚠ Turnovers in 4th quarter / critical moments are the main blemish on his big–game resume so far.
Marcel Reed Texas A&M
Here’s a detailed breakdown of Texas A&M QB Marcel Reed’s 2025 performance in key situational contexts — especially third-down performance, clutch moments (3rd/4th quarter), and performance in high-leverage situations:
🏈 Third-Down Performance — Passing & Rushing Impact
📊 Passing Third-Down Splits (2025)
According to official situational passing stats:
Overall third-down passing
12 games: 35 completions on 72 attempts → 48.6 % conversion
459 yards, 4 TDs, 3 INTs, 112.2 passer rating
These numbers show a lag compared to A&M’s overall completion % (61.8 %) and rating, indicating struggles converting consistently on third downs through the air. �
CFB Stats
Third-down breakdown by distance:
1–3 yd: 54.5 % (modest efficiency)
4–6 yd: 45.5 %, 2 TDs (high reward when successful)
7–9 yd: 47.6 %
10+ yd: 50 %
These splits suggest situational inconsistency — while efficiency is okay on longer throws, short-to-medium yardage is often a challenge, especially under pressure. �
CFB Stats
🏃 Rushing on Third Down
Reed also contributes with his legs:
3rd Down rushing (all): 11 attempts, 23 yards — 2.0 YPC with 1 TD
Gains are modest overall but valuable when they come — especially short-to-medium situations and conversions. �
CFB Stats
📌 What This Means
📉 Passing conversions on third down are below elite marks, suggesting Reed sometimes struggles to consistently keep drives alive through the air. �
CFB Stats
🤝 Rushing adds a complementary element, giving A&M a dual-threat option that defenses must respect, but it’s not a dominant third-down rushing edge overall. �
CFB Stats
Context — Outside Analysis:
Recent previews note A&M’s offense and Reed face scrutiny on third downs, with completion performance under center described as a relative weakness compared to elite QBs this season. �
State of The U
🔥 Clutch Moments — 3rd & 4th Quarters
📊 Situational Passing by Quarter (2025, ESPN splits)
While full situational splits by quarter from ESPN aren’t shown in every detail, we do know:
Performance vs AP Top 25:
Completion %: 58.0 %
963 passing yards
6 TDs, 5 INTs, 134.2 passer rating
This shows efficiency dips in big moments but Reed still generates scoring impact vs top teams. �
ESPN.com
📍 Notable Clutch Performances
Big Comeback vs South Carolina (Week 12)
Trailed by 27 points at half → Reed finished with 439 passing yards, 3 TDs.
Second half: 16/20 for 298 yards, all 3 passing scores in the third quarter, and led the winning drive early in the 4th.
Also converted third-down with an 8-yard run during the clinching drive. �
WTOP News
This game exemplifies Reed’s potential as a high-ceiling clutch performer — turning a massive deficit into a historic comeback, particularly in the third quarter and early fourth quarter. �
WTOP News
⚖ Performance in Close & High-Leverage Situations
📊 Passing Splits by Score Margin
From situational data:
Winning by 1–7: 59.2 % comp, 739 yards, 6 TDs, 2 INTs, 134.8 rating
Tied games: ~66.1 % comp, 458 yards, 5 TDs — favorable efficiency
Losing by small margins: lower comp %, but still respectable ratings
This suggests Reed doesn’t collapse in tight games but doesn’t always elevate to elite efficiency either. �
CFB Stats
🧠 Red-Zone Performance
Inside opponents’ 20: 56.8 % comp with 12 TDs, 3 INTs, rating ~166.8 — this shows inside-the-red-zone scoring aggressiveness and results sometimes outweigh efficiency. �
CFB Stats
🧩 Narrative Summary — Clutch & Situational Takeaways
📈 What Reed Does Well
✔ Explosive third-quarter production: Career-best moments, especially in comeback scenarios. �
✔ Red-zone scoring presence: High touchdown output shows an ability to finish drives when close to the end zone. �
✔ Dual-threat option: Adds rushing facets to key conversions and drives. �
WTOP News
CFB Stats
CFB Stats
📉 Areas of Relative Weakness
⚠ Third-down passing efficiency is suboptimal: Under 50 % conversion indicates struggles to sustain drives consistently through the air. �
⚠ Big-game passing efficiency dips vs ranked teams: Lower completion % and passer rating reflect inconsistency under pressure. �
CFB Stats
ESPN.com
📊 Clutch Performance Pattern
Reed has episodic elite stretch play — as seen in historic comeback against South Carolina where he nearly single-handedly flipped the game. �
WTOP News
However, consistency in converting third downs and late-game execution through the air is still a developing aspect of his game. �
CFB Stats
🏁 Overall Situational Snapshot
Situational Category
Performance Level
Third-Down Passing
Below average efficiency (48.6 %) �
CFB Stats
Third-Down Rushing
Modest but useful �
CFB Stats
Clutch Scoring Moments
High-variance — elite in some games �
WTOP News
Vs Ranked Teams
Moderate with turnovers �
ESPN.com
Red-Zone Passing
Effective scoring presence �
CFB Stats
Last edited:
