Case For The Under

[eztds]

Under 191 Mavs/Bulls

Here's why:

-On Dec. 27 two teams played to a score of 163 in Dallas.

-The Mavs had Echmeyer and Finley who averages 21 pts/game in that one.

-Tonight, it looks like Manning and Griffen who averages only 7 pts/game.

-I'll trade Finley for Griffen and take an under total that's 28 pts above the final tally in the game 6 days ago.

-Bulls shot 38% and the Mavs 44% in that affair on Dec. 27.

-Bulls have shot better in their recent 2 at about 46%.....probably the reason why the linesmen set tonight's total where they did.
-Hope'n the Bull return to true form. We'll soon see. GLTA

33-19 YTD...1-0...LN ez

 

[thisisbad]

my only problem with this is Bulls seem to score better at home, and Mavs seem to score well anywhere. The line just dropped to 189.5, i might take the over.

Thanks for posting though, you are giving excelent points to think about.

 

[eztds]

With the 2H over/under at 93 in the Mavs/Bulls.......I gotta go for the middle between 178 and 191.

Worst that can happen is 1-1 and loose the vig.

Play'n over 93 2H. GL guys! ez

 

[wigs]

gl, looked like nash went down at the buzzer, tweaked an ankle. not to mention that if i am not mistaken nowitzki was scoreless in the first half,

 

[eztds]

t-i-b and wigs.....

Thanks for the replies and input gentlemen.

Don't ya just hate the HACK'N & FOUL'N.....FOUL'N & HACK'N???? (Guess not if ya have the over.)

Things were set soooo well for a nice little middle with the HT at 85 pts. Then....the free throws and a few three balls make for a 119 pt 2H!!

On the bright side 1-1 is better than 0-1.

Still got on Antonio's Tor/Port under work'n for a CHANCE at a winning night. Thanks to him!

34-20 YTD ez

 

[Antonio]

no prob my man, we work as a team here and we'll rip the book more than 58% of the time. Congrats on your season, whats that winning % at now 63%? keep it up!

 

[Guerilla_Ninja]

that YTD speaks for itself ez...

i was at tonights game and played a "sweating" DAL side. my lean would have been under as well. no finley for DAL and no fizer for CHI. thought this would remain slow going. but, the game was close and nelson had to keep nash and nowitski in late in the game. can't believe CHI artest with 29. DAL over 100 9 out of last 11 i believe. but, CHI is averaging low to mid 80's.

keep up the strong work!

 

[thisisbad]

Sorry my first post in one of your threads had to be negative. But i would definetly take your opinoin more often than my own

Anyway, like i said before thanks a lot for your continued posting, it is much appreciated. Keep up the excellent work, one small slip means nothing in the big scheme

 

[eztds]

thanks for the comments guys

A reply or two once in a while never hurts the motivation to "keep on, keep'n on".

Hope'n once bowl season ends tonight.....the TEAM will get back on the road. We had some real "road warriors" knock'n 'em down during that December "road trip" with HC JT and Assistant RC.

G_N....Artest caused that over 2H for sure.

Antonio....ya got me over the hump to a Tor/Port over and a winning "hump night".

t-i-b....never took the post as negative....rather another just opposite opinion that might contain something I hadn't considered carefully enough. As it turned out....you were right on. Congrats ez

 

[Valuist]

I saw the whole game and there is no way in he11 it should've went over the total. The 2 teams combined for under 40 pts in the 1st quarter; the problem was the game turned into foul-a-rama and with the clock stopped, the under players were screwed.