Climate change skeptics call out marchers? ?hypocrisies?

[Lumi]

Climate change skeptics call out marchers? ?hypocrisies?

http://nypost.com/2014/09/22/climate-change-skeptics-call-out-marchers-hypocrisies/

 

[Rock the Casbah]

The garbage that marches doesn't give a fk about the planet.
Their agenda is to produce a Global and Socialist State. I'd wager 89% do not have a job and are on some kind of public assistance, 8% being gainfully employed at minimum wage and 3% local tenured professors sucking the taxpayer tit...

:0008

 

[ssd]

Gore leaves a climate march in a Chevy SUV

Kennedy wants Americans to give up their cars and cellphones....but. not him----rules do not apply to him or AL.


Hypocrites.


And -

OH NOES!!!!!

A new study released this week: Gov't scientists report in a new study that higher temps along the Pacific coast are due to a lack of wind and NOT from human activity or "climate change"

The Los Angeles Times quotes study leader James Johnstone: "Changing winds appear to explain a very large fraction of the warming from year to year, decade to decade and the long-term." The Times adds: "This latest research shows that similar changes in atmospheric and ocean circulation can drive trends that last a century or longer, overshadowing the effects of human-generated increase in greenhouse gases, the study's authors said.

 

[Duff Miver]

Gore leaves a climate march in a Chevy SUV

Kennedy wants Americans to give up their cars and cellphones....but. not him----rules do not apply to him or AL.


Hypocrites.


And -

OH NOES!!!!!

A new study released this week: Gov't scientists report in a new study that higher temps along the Pacific coast are due to a lack of wind and NOT from human activity or "climate change"

The Los Angeles Times quotes study leader James Johnstone: "Changing winds appear to explain a very large fraction of the warming from year to year, decade to decade and the long-term." The Times adds: "This latest research shows that similar changes in atmospheric and ocean circulation can drive trends that last a century or longer, overshadowing the effects of human-generated increase in greenhouse gases, the study's authors said.

If you'd have bothered to read and understand the entire article, you'd have read the last two paragraphs:

One renowned climate scientist who had not seen the study, Kerry A. Emanuel of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said its findings were not inconsistent with what experts know about climate change.

?The common misperception about global warming is that it?s globally uniform,? he said. ?It isn?t. There are even a few places over a couple hundred years that have actually cooled, such as the Southeastern U.S.?

So Johnstone may be correct. There probably are limited areas where the temperature has actually declined, but globally temperatures are increasing, and no reputable scientist disputes that, not even Johnstone.

Reading comprehension limited or short attention span?

 

[hedgehog]

It's a scam

 

[ssd]

Of course the "climate expert" disagrees with anything that disproves his point of view.

Climatology....economy....meteorology.....those "gray" sciences where you are wrong more often than right and get to keep your job.

Did u see that the u.n. Will continue to allow China, the worlds largest co2 pollution emitter to continue unabated?