Not sure if someone else covered this in another spread, but..I had the over in the kc game, did I lose? I bet with a local book and I'm not sure if i lost or had no bet yet...I guess I will find out tonight but in general, does a game have to go 8.5 innings to be complete on the total?
concerning the kc/flor total
- Thread starter superrich
- Start date
total
total
some locals say a game must go 8 inninngs for a total to count off shores i would think 8.5 is the general rule
total
some locals say a game must go 8 inninngs for a total to count off shores i would think 8.5 is the general rule
As for Wednesday's totals in this series, the number just hit 10 at Canbet. When they deviate from the rest, its best to take notice. Its as low as 9 at WSEX (-150 on the over).
With Sweeney out (of the starting lineup) for Wed, is there any special reason the KC-FLA over seems to be getting hit so hard? :shrug: Just wondering....I'm actually leaning to the under but will probably pass. GL all
Night Owl
Night Owl
In my limited experience, most books require a complete game (9 innings or 8 1/2 if the home team wins) in order for a total to count. This is true even if the game is already over when the game is stopped.
I got lucky once this year with an under play that I had already written off as lost, when God intervened and the game was stopped in the 8th!!! Could have worked the other way, too, but I was fortunate that time.
I got lucky once this year with an under play that I had already written off as lost, when God intervened and the game was stopped in the 8th!!! Could have worked the other way, too, but I was fortunate that time.
This Canbet angle is on fire as this game easily went over. The one other odd money flow there is the Nets on the moneyline; it was +180 or so everywhere but was holding at +155 at CB until a couple hours ago.
