Defending Home Court

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
The marquee game of the college basketball night features Syracuse looking to defeat Pitt for the second time this season. Pitt is currently a small home favorite, and they?re looking to take down the undefeated Orangemen. If past results are any indicator, they have a good chance to come out victorious.

Pittsburgh?s major strength is length. They are top 20 in college basketball in rebounding percentage and they outrebounded Syracuse by 10 in their last meeting, including 16 offensive rebounds. This is not surprising given that they are fourth in the country in offensive rebounding rate. This is a weak spot for this Syracuse team, as they are 203rd in the country in giving up offensive rebounds, allowing opponents to rebound 30.2% of their misses. While still impressively outscoring Syracuse 19-2 in second chance points, Pitt left some points off the board by missing easy baskets off offensive rebounds. In addition to their impressive work on the glass, Pittsburgh is 16th of all DI teams in assists per game, average 3.3 more than Syracuse per outing, while also limiting opponents assists better than the Orange. Pitt also averages 2.3 more free throw attempts per game, showing their aggressiveness in the paint.

All of Pitt's strengths were reflected in their earlier meeting with Syracuse this season, where they outrebounded them, attempted more free throws, and had a better assist ratio. Teams that win these three categories in the box score win the game 95.2% of the time over the last five college basketball seasons and cover the spread 75.7% of the time.

What hurt Pitt in their last matchup was their poor field goal percentage and field goal defense. Like most college teams, Pitt is much better defensively at home, while Syracuse?s defense is not as good on the road. I expect Pittsburgh to improve on the 38.3% they shot from the field in the last meeting and Syracuse?s 51.2% to decrease dramatically since Pitt has been limiting opponents to just 38.5% on the season at home. Despite their poor shooting, they only lost the last game by five points which is remarkable considering that over the last five seasons college teams that shoot over 50% while limiting opponents to less than 40% win the game by an average margin of 20.93 points. This highlights how Pitt dominated every other aspect of the game.

Despite being one of the greatest college coaches ever, Boeheim has struggled against Dixon. Under Dixon, the Panthers are 10-5 against Syracuse, including 5-0 in their last five home meetings, with their lone home loss coming in 2004. At home they have beat Syracuse by an average margin of 8.8 points. In the last seven seasons they are 7-1-1 ATS vs the Orange. Tonight?s game is also a familiar role for Dixon, in that he has led his team to wins against undefeated Syracuse teams in the 2009 and 2010 seasons.

Pittsburgh has struggled ATS this season, covering just 35% of their spreads, and they are just 4-12-1 ATS in their last 17 games. They are coming off a close overtime win against a bad Virginia Tech team. With two big games upcoming, they may have had a bit of a look-ahead mentality during the Tech game. They are now on a four game ATS losing streak and they have lost their two biggest home games of the season, to Duke and Virginia. Despite this, they hold a better margin of victory than Syracuse on the season. At home they win by an average of 15.5 points per game, which is 32nd out of 351 DI teams. Their home court is important, as their average margin of victory improves by 6.4 points vs when they play on the road. Under Dixon, the Panthers are 178-24 at home.

Since the 2007 regular season, Syracuse is 5-9 SU as a road dog playing against a team with a worse record. In this same time period, undefeated teams getting deep into the season with at least 16 wins are 0-9 SU and ATS when playing as a road dog. This is a buy low, sell high game.

Pittsburgh Panthers -1.5
 

green2240

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 10, 2011
7,922
185
63
SF, CA
Solid post as always. Are you worried about Pattersons health, that's the only thing holding me up
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Who's Patterson? ;)

I'm a big believer in next man up. I don't really care what names are on the back of the jerseys, as long as they have five or so guys out there to play.

Media has all but written Pitt off already as a bubble team for the tournament.

Starkey: Pitt's ugly win shows importance of Patterson

What's happened to Pitt?

Maybe they're right. I'm certainly no expert, it's just my take on it, but I like when solid teams have been written off by media outlets, and I feel that this is a good time to back them.

Cheers
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
HH

HH

Hey HH, had a question was hoping to get your advice on.

I was actually wondering if wouldn't be too much if I shot an email your way -- as would truly appreciate the input on the matter

appreciate your work as always -t
 
  • Like
Reactions: Happy Hippo

green2240

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 10, 2011
7,922
185
63
SF, CA
Hippo,
I subscribe to same notion. My only hesitance was tied to his importance during the first matchup at the Carrier Dome.
It was either Pitt or no play for me...but after seeing your analysis and watching the crazy reverse line move (-2.5 now despite 77% on Cuse) I'm all in
 

Hashish

Smoked
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2006
8,085
107
0
Surf City
Just a little something to back your play. Boeheim always says without hesitation that no one carves his zone up like Jamie Dixon. Good luck.
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Loss either way, but not sure about that time out at the end by Dixon, giving Cuse time to draw something up. Strange move.

Big heart shown by Syracuse there to gut that one out. Great college game.

Super tight line, was up for grabs pretty much the whole game. Pitt had their chances to pull away but couldn't capitalize.

On to the next one...
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top