Did Minnesota throw the game

superrich

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 30, 2001
74
0
0
baltimore,md usa
I know I'm starting the age old debate about fixing games, but come on....Kevin Garnett plays 40 minutes of a meaningless game and goes 8 for 23..Anthony Peeler 3 for 12, Wally 6 for 16..Minnesota cost me a lot of money tonight, but I think they cost the integrity of the game much more...And I'm not sure , but Wally missed two late free throws right to give them the lead? Strange....Anyways, just somehting to talk about..Even if someone came out and told me NBA was fixed, I'd still bet it and hope I pick the right side the game was fixed for. Minnesota shot 37% for the game....Maybe they just ddint care tonight.
 

Nick Douglas

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2000
3,688
15
0
48
Los Angeles, CA, USA
None of the things you brought up make any sense as far as a game being fixed. The object of fixing a game is to not make it noticable (according to Hedake Smith in an interview he gave to Sports Illustrated about the games he fixed at Arizona State). The specific thing he mentioned was giving a guy extra space on a jumper.

I watched the game and lost, too. The game wasn't fixed, it was just a bad shooting night from a team that relies on jumpers for their offense. The jumpers weren't there, so they lost. Don't worry about one loss, just come back and look for a better play next time.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Re: Did Minnesota throw the game

superrich said:
[B

]Even if someone came out and told me NBA was fixed, I'd still bet it and hope I pick the right side the game was fixed for. [/B]

aint gamblin fun !

I am still laughing at that one. Even if he knew for sure that the NBA was fixed , he would still bet it and try to pick the side the game was fixed for ......hahahahhahahaha.....

my mama always told me .....son if the games are fixed you dont bet em....


Scott-Atlanta
 

hoya

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 2, 2001
374
0
0
Its called Minnesota sucks and is way overrated as always. Why would players already making millions of dollars risk their careers by taking money they dont need to fix a game?
 

superrich

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 30, 2001
74
0
0
baltimore,md usa
Do I really think the game was fixed ...No....Do I think athletes making millions are tempted to miss a few shots...I wouldn't be surprised if it were true. A lot of these guys burn through their money and end up broke....For the record, I was just venting.
 

THUNDER

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2000
31,199
105
63
the problem with the wolves is chemistry-billups and wally are pmsing with each other, when billups is running the point he just does not get wally the ball. billups drove 3 or 4 times last night well defended and wally was wide open for the 3 each time. brandon going down killed this team. o wise and from a unselfish leadership role. unless they turn it around they will once again get bounced in the first round.
 

walleyek

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 16, 2001
352
1
0
Minnesota
They'll be lucky to win a GAME, much less a first round series with San Antonio. The Wolves really should consider bringing back Marbury. KG cannot take a game over and needs a supporting player, which neither Wally nor Billups can fill.
 

THUNDER

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2000
31,199
105
63
brandon is underrated- marbury is a cancer. this team coud have easily won 57- 60 games with him marbury is not the answer. a healthy brandon is.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top