Ducks

hawkeye

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 29, 2000
26,119
202
63
denver, co-usa
-46 hell it should be 86. They are pissed after falling in the BCS--the computer part is the one that rated them low--the comuter does not see any games just reacts to data feed it--so this week they will run it up big time--they need to get into the top 3 before. CU has zero speed-young secondary and no offense. I bet very few sides each year but is one I will definetely bet--gl
 

taylormade9998

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 14, 2011
433
10
0
Burlington, New Jersey
-46 hell it should be 86. They are pissed after falling in the BCS--the computer part is the one that rated them low--the comuter does not see any games just reacts to data feed it--so this week they will run it up big time--they need to get into the top 3 before. CU has zero speed-young secondary and no offense. I bet very few sides each year but is one I will definetely bet--gl

I was just saying the same thing this morning before I even saw they were playing Colorado. I think the line play is great as well as the team total for oregon is a great play.
 

hawkeye

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 29, 2000
26,119
202
63
denver, co-usa
Yep 50% chance Thurs/Fri-rain snow mix? Cold also. Played golf today and shot a 78 best score by me in a long time-long time:rolleyes:
 

Ronnie

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 16, 2000
7,527
35
48
56
At the bar
Oregon will be my game of the year. They will score at least 70 in this game. They'll teach those computers a thing or two this weekend. I fully expect them to be up by at least 42 by halftime.
 

alb

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 30, 1999
1,871
7
38
Gibraltar
I will be on it cause Oregon does like running up scores. Remember though that margin of victory is irrelevant in the computer rankings.

From Wiki;
'Jeff Anderson and Chris Hester are the owners of this computer system that has been a part of the BCS since its inception. The Anderson & Hester Rankings claim to be distinct in four ways:[1]
These rankings do not reward teams for running up scores. Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game. Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered.'
 

in the black

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2004
1,333
7
0
B'ham,AL.
I will be on it cause Oregon does like running up scores. Remember though that margin of victory is irrelevant in the computer rankings.

From Wiki;
'Jeff Anderson and Chris Hester are the owners of this computer system that has been a part of the BCS since its inception. The Anderson & Hester Rankings claim to be distinct in four ways:[1]
These rankings do not reward teams for running up scores. Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game. Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered.'

Oregon likes to run it up? Did you watch last Thursday's game at ASU? Oregon up 43-7 with 11:30 to go in the 2nd QTR and didn't score another point.They did everything they could not to run it up or they might have hit 100.

This week Colorado probably won't be so lucky.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top