Durham Probe Indictments
- Thread starter Skulnik
- Start date
Better check your facts, Flynn was saving his son from the FBI threats of prosecution.
But you REALLY know that.
:nono:
So you can lie to the FBI if you have a good excuse? I didn't know that. Thanks.
How come he was sent to jail?
opcorn2
Blue State Blues: John Durham Found the First Evidence of ?Russia Collusion? ? and Hillary?s Team Did It
139
Lavrov, Hillary, Reset button FABRICE COFFRINIAFPGettyFABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty
JOEL B. POLLAK5 Nov 20211,175
5:39
Special Counsel John Durham?s indictment Thursday of ?dossier? source Igor Danchenko revealed the first real evidence of ?Russia collusion? ? and it was linked to Hillary Clinton?s associates, not to Donald Trump or his presidential campaign.
Danchenko, a Russian-born, U.S.-based researcher, had worked from 2005-2010 at the Brookings Institution with Strobe Talbott, a former official from Bill Clinton?s State Department.
He later became the main ?Russian? source for former British spy Christopher Steele, who compiled the fraudulent ?Russia dossier? on Donald Trump on behalf of opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which was secretly being paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
The ?dossier? was fed to the FBI and the press, and was used in FISA surveillance warrants on (innocent) Trump aide Carter Page. Through Page?s communications, the Clinton-friendly Obama administration had visibility into Trump?s campaign.
That much was known before Thursday. But the indictment revealed even more.
A figure identified as ?PR Executive-1,? and later confirmed to be communications consultant (and Clinton apparatchik) Charles Dolan Jr., was working with Danchenko.
Dolan had the kind of Russian contacts that Trump?s enemies searched for, in vain, when they persecuted the 45th president. Had Special Counsel Robert Mueller found anything like these contacts near Trump, the hoax would have been vindicated.
The indictment notes that Dolan ?spent much of his career interacting with Eurasian clients with a particular focus on Russia.? He had even handled ?global public relations for the Russian government and a state-owned energy company.?
It gets worse.
Dolan had relationships with ?senior Russian Federation leadership,? including Russian President Vladimir Putin?s press secretary and his staff. He also was friendly with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. and his deputies.
Dolan attended meetings at the Russian embassy in Washington, DC. He arranged meetings in Moscow at which Danchenko met with Russian officials and ?sub-sources? who gave him information that later ended up in Steele?s sensational dossier.
Durham?s indictment filing tells the story of the infamous ?pee tape? allegation, in which Trump was alleged to have hired prostitutes to urinate on a bed where President Barack Obama was to have slept during a visit to a Moscow hotel. In June 2016, the indictment alleges, Dolan and another associate, identified as ?Organizer-1,? stayed at the same hotel, and were given a guided tour by the management.
Durham told the court: ?According to Organizer-1, during the aforementioned tour of the Presidential Suite, a Moscow Hotel staff member told the participants, including PR Executive-1, that Trump had stayed in the Presidential Suite. According to both Organizer-1 and PR Executive-1, the staff member did not mention any sexual or salacious activity.?
The entire story of the prostitutes was therefore a fabrication ? and Danchenko is now being charged for lying to the FBI about whether Dolan was a source for ?Trump?s stay and alleged activity in the Moscow hotel.?
In October 2016, Dolan and Danchenko attended a conference in Moscow with ?several Russian government officials.? The conference included meetings in the Kremlin itself.
Though the Clinton campaign supposedly did not know about Dolan?s activities (according to Dolan), one important ?sub-source? believed that Dolan was an ?advisor? to Hillary Clinton, whom he hoped would win. He expected to be taken to the State Department in the event that Hillary Clinton defeated Trump.
Whether Dolan was acting on the campaign?s instructions or not, Danchenko was providing information to Steele, whose research was being funded by the campaign. And Dolan was making sure Danchenko had information Steele could use.
Dolan?s contacts with Russia went much further than a random meeting at Trump Tower ? an arm?s-length contact that once fueled establishment media conspiracy theories.
Dolan was in direct contact with officials close to Vladimir Putin himself.
And at least some of his sources made clear that they wanted Hillary Clinton to win. One even asked for her autograph.
This was ?Russia collusion? of the highest order, reinforcing the possibility that the Steele dossier was itself Russian disinformation.
The irony of it all is that Danchenko and Dolan were manufacturing evidence of Trump?s supposed ?collusion? with Russia, while colluding with Russia themselves.
And it looks like Durham?s indictment is just the tip of the Arctic iceberg.
Trump-haters greeted every ?Russia collusion? leak by declaring ?the walls are closing in? or that it was ?worse than Watergate.?
Well, now the walls really are closing in ? on the Clintons? world. And this really was worse than Watergate.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...of-russia-collusion-and-hillarys-team-did-it/
139
Lavrov, Hillary, Reset button FABRICE COFFRINIAFPGettyFABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty
JOEL B. POLLAK5 Nov 20211,175
5:39
Special Counsel John Durham?s indictment Thursday of ?dossier? source Igor Danchenko revealed the first real evidence of ?Russia collusion? ? and it was linked to Hillary Clinton?s associates, not to Donald Trump or his presidential campaign.
Danchenko, a Russian-born, U.S.-based researcher, had worked from 2005-2010 at the Brookings Institution with Strobe Talbott, a former official from Bill Clinton?s State Department.
He later became the main ?Russian? source for former British spy Christopher Steele, who compiled the fraudulent ?Russia dossier? on Donald Trump on behalf of opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which was secretly being paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
The ?dossier? was fed to the FBI and the press, and was used in FISA surveillance warrants on (innocent) Trump aide Carter Page. Through Page?s communications, the Clinton-friendly Obama administration had visibility into Trump?s campaign.
That much was known before Thursday. But the indictment revealed even more.
A figure identified as ?PR Executive-1,? and later confirmed to be communications consultant (and Clinton apparatchik) Charles Dolan Jr., was working with Danchenko.
Dolan had the kind of Russian contacts that Trump?s enemies searched for, in vain, when they persecuted the 45th president. Had Special Counsel Robert Mueller found anything like these contacts near Trump, the hoax would have been vindicated.
The indictment notes that Dolan ?spent much of his career interacting with Eurasian clients with a particular focus on Russia.? He had even handled ?global public relations for the Russian government and a state-owned energy company.?
It gets worse.
Dolan had relationships with ?senior Russian Federation leadership,? including Russian President Vladimir Putin?s press secretary and his staff. He also was friendly with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. and his deputies.
Dolan attended meetings at the Russian embassy in Washington, DC. He arranged meetings in Moscow at which Danchenko met with Russian officials and ?sub-sources? who gave him information that later ended up in Steele?s sensational dossier.
Durham?s indictment filing tells the story of the infamous ?pee tape? allegation, in which Trump was alleged to have hired prostitutes to urinate on a bed where President Barack Obama was to have slept during a visit to a Moscow hotel. In June 2016, the indictment alleges, Dolan and another associate, identified as ?Organizer-1,? stayed at the same hotel, and were given a guided tour by the management.
Durham told the court: ?According to Organizer-1, during the aforementioned tour of the Presidential Suite, a Moscow Hotel staff member told the participants, including PR Executive-1, that Trump had stayed in the Presidential Suite. According to both Organizer-1 and PR Executive-1, the staff member did not mention any sexual or salacious activity.?
The entire story of the prostitutes was therefore a fabrication ? and Danchenko is now being charged for lying to the FBI about whether Dolan was a source for ?Trump?s stay and alleged activity in the Moscow hotel.?
In October 2016, Dolan and Danchenko attended a conference in Moscow with ?several Russian government officials.? The conference included meetings in the Kremlin itself.
Though the Clinton campaign supposedly did not know about Dolan?s activities (according to Dolan), one important ?sub-source? believed that Dolan was an ?advisor? to Hillary Clinton, whom he hoped would win. He expected to be taken to the State Department in the event that Hillary Clinton defeated Trump.
Whether Dolan was acting on the campaign?s instructions or not, Danchenko was providing information to Steele, whose research was being funded by the campaign. And Dolan was making sure Danchenko had information Steele could use.
Dolan?s contacts with Russia went much further than a random meeting at Trump Tower ? an arm?s-length contact that once fueled establishment media conspiracy theories.
Dolan was in direct contact with officials close to Vladimir Putin himself.
And at least some of his sources made clear that they wanted Hillary Clinton to win. One even asked for her autograph.
This was ?Russia collusion? of the highest order, reinforcing the possibility that the Steele dossier was itself Russian disinformation.
The irony of it all is that Danchenko and Dolan were manufacturing evidence of Trump?s supposed ?collusion? with Russia, while colluding with Russia themselves.
And it looks like Durham?s indictment is just the tip of the Arctic iceberg.
Trump-haters greeted every ?Russia collusion? leak by declaring ?the walls are closing in? or that it was ?worse than Watergate.?
Well, now the walls really are closing in ? on the Clintons? world. And this really was worse than Watergate.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...of-russia-collusion-and-hillarys-team-did-it/
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BREAKING: Trump impeachment witness Fiona Hill implicated in criminal Steele Dossier operation</p>— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) <a href="https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1456310543283851265?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 4, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
That dossier was bullshit and everyone knew it outside of the blinded orangemanbad crowd. Dachenko indictment barely touched on. Certainly received less media attention than the dossier. No surprise since Dachenko and and Brit were hired by dem national party and Clinton campaign in an attempt to steal the election, which just so happens to be what DJT was accused of
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/kADIwK5rNUw" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
:0074
:0074
John Durham Is Getting Close To The Jugular
Last week, John Durham?s grand jury issued its third criminal indictment in the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. The person who was arrested may be obscure; the news may have been buried after Virginia?s bombshell election results; but Durham?s move is a big deal. It shows that the special counsel?s probe is methodically unraveling a huge conspiracy, seemingly engineered by Hillary Clinton?s 2016 campaign and implicating James Comey?s FBI, either as a willing participant or as utterly incompetent boobs.
Reviewing this evidence, Kimberly Strassel of the Wall Street Journal has concluded the Steele dossier is misnamed. It should be called the ?Clinton dossier,? she says, since Hillary commissioned it, paid for it, and had her aides feed it to the media, the State Department, and the FBI. It was a full-scale disinformation campaign ? coherent, well-organized, and well-funded. It was rotten to the core.
The question now is whether John Durham can find enough evidence to charge the ones who planned and executed it. The charging documents he filed for Danchenko and Sussmann are far more extensive than the necessary minimum. They suggest that Durham has compiled extensive evidence about a broader conspiracy. Will he settle for the capillaries now that he has the jugular in view?
[link to www.realclearpolitics.com (secure)]
Last week, John Durham?s grand jury issued its third criminal indictment in the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. The person who was arrested may be obscure; the news may have been buried after Virginia?s bombshell election results; but Durham?s move is a big deal. It shows that the special counsel?s probe is methodically unraveling a huge conspiracy, seemingly engineered by Hillary Clinton?s 2016 campaign and implicating James Comey?s FBI, either as a willing participant or as utterly incompetent boobs.
Reviewing this evidence, Kimberly Strassel of the Wall Street Journal has concluded the Steele dossier is misnamed. It should be called the ?Clinton dossier,? she says, since Hillary commissioned it, paid for it, and had her aides feed it to the media, the State Department, and the FBI. It was a full-scale disinformation campaign ? coherent, well-organized, and well-funded. It was rotten to the core.
The question now is whether John Durham can find enough evidence to charge the ones who planned and executed it. The charging documents he filed for Danchenko and Sussmann are far more extensive than the necessary minimum. They suggest that Durham has compiled extensive evidence about a broader conspiracy. Will he settle for the capillaries now that he has the jugular in view?
[link to www.realclearpolitics.com (secure)]
Fusion GPS was initially hired by a Republican donor. Why does that always get left out?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
First of all, it was not a Republican donor. It was a conservative website I?ve never heard of
Secondly, Who cares who hired them for Investigative work before Hillary campaign and dem national party hired them to prepare a fake dossier?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...r-630pm:homepage/story&utm_term=.32730a719f20
Good grief
The whole concept was hatched by Republican(s) to take Trump down. As my new favorite independent, you don?t find it at all interesting that people in the GOP wanted him out? Hillary gets blamed but she just picked up the tab when they realized he was going to be the nominee.
PS: Fusion GPS wasn?t hired to create a fake dossier. They were hired to dig up dirt on Trump.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is from a NY Times article 10/25/17 by Kenneth Vogel. The Trump Dossier: What we know and who paid for it.
Who paid for it?
During the Republican primaries, a research firm called Fusion GPS was hired by The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website, to unearth potentially damaging information about Mr. Trump. The Free Beacon ? which was funded by a major donor supporting Mr. Trump?s rival for the party?s nomination, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida ? told Fusion GPS to stop doing research on Mr. Trump in May 2016
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who paid for it?
During the Republican primaries, a research firm called Fusion GPS was hired by The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website, to unearth potentially damaging information about Mr. Trump. The Free Beacon ? which was funded by a major donor supporting Mr. Trump?s rival for the party?s nomination, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida ? told Fusion GPS to stop doing research on Mr. Trump in May 2016
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Gary, don't forget to add Snopes to make your fiction real.
Hope this is helpful.
You?ve got two different sources in this thread confirming what I already said, and they are both considered credible.
