Fantasy Question

[theGibber1]

i know the rule of thumb is to always draft two running backs first...

but what does anyone think of a Mcnabb Owens combo for the 1st two picks????

The eagles have one the softest schedules in the league...

giants twice, Detroit, Cleveland, wash

im expecting big numbers from these these two

thoughts?

 

[White Shadow]

McNabb killed me early last year and I finally traded him. He really didn't have any weapons but I just thought their offense sucked fantasy-wise. I suppose if you could get McNabb and TO that it would be a pretty nice combo to have. I always like to have a receiver on the same team as my QB but I don't know that I would sacrifice having no RB after 2 rounds to do it.

 

[theGibber1]

good point..

and if i did do a QB WR combo, i would probably go with Culpepper and Moss anyway..

thanks

gl

 

[Another Steve]

How many Teams in your Draft?

I'm in 3 Money leauges, 2 14 teams and 1 10 teams. If it's possible I want Manning and Harrison. Once they Play Ne, they have a easy schudule.

 

[bjfinste]

If you went with McNabb and Owens in the first two rounds and there are at least 10 players in the league, they would obviously be great players, but if you didn't get a couple of decent backs to fall or catch a nice RB sleeper, you could really end up hurting at that position.

 

[2muchchalk]

u need to take at least one RB in the first two rounds. If you don't take one of the 15 best RBs in the first two rounds you are left with C- RB. THen if one of your starters gets hurt or has a bye you are up s creek if u know what i am saying. I would rather even take 3 rb's right in the first 3 rounds. WRs are plentiful. The best fanasty qb doesn't get that many more points than a middle of the pack qb. TE are crapshoots and defenses should be based on matchups.

Just my take.