Finally some one with a open mind

goldcupsports

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 26, 1999
866
0
0
Wichita,KS
Some lawmakers call for regulating, not banning, online gambling


WASHINGTON (AP) - A small bipartisan group of lawmakers wants to let states regulate and tax Internet gambling, even others in Congress renew efforts to ban the burgeoning form of wagering.

Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., introduced legislation Wednesday that would pave the way to legalizing Internet gambling in states interested in licensing, overseeing and collecting taxes from the growing industry.

``Just as outlawing alcohol did not work in the 1920s, current attempts to prohibit online gaming will not work, either,'' said Conyers, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.

In a series of votes since 1998, large majorities in the House and Senate have voted to outlaw gambling over the Internet. Disputes over how to define illegal gambling, what forms of wagering to exempt and how to enforce a ban have prevented Congress from agreeing on legislation.

Opponents of Internet gambling are resuming their campaign, and the House Financial Services Committee is considering legislation that would prohibit the use of credit cards, checks and electronic fund transfers to pay for online betting transactions.

Internet gambling has exploded. Christiansen Capital Advisors, which studies the gambling industry, estimates that online wagering worldwide will top $6 billion this year and $10 billion in 2005.

But leaders of the long-running effort to ban Internet gambling say it cannot be effectively regulated.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said he doubts that an online casino would ever be able to distinguish a bet placed legally in a state that regulates Internet gambling from a bet placed illegally in a state that bans it.

The Conyers bill would create a commission to study such questions.

A British online trading company, Sportingbet PLC, estimated that U.S. states could have collected $1.4 billion in 2002 by taxing Internet gambling as they do real casinos.

MGM Mirage Inc., the largest operator of Las Vegas Strip hotels, last year became the first major U.S. gambling company to open an online casino, based in and regulated by the Isle of Man off the British coast.

Because the current legal status of Internet gambling in the United States is hazy -- some site operators have been prosecuted under the 1961 Wire Communications Act, written to cover sports betting via telephone -- MGM's online casino does not yet accept bets from the United States.

MGM Mirage spokesman Alan Feldman said the Conyers proposal is a welcome indication that some lawmakers have open minds about how technology and the public appetite for gambling have evolved.

``This is deserving of a good debate here in the United States,'' he said. ``Let's look at technology today, where the industry stands today, and what the public is doing. There are hundreds of thousands of Americans who go online every day and wager millions of dollars.''

The American Gaming Association, which represents commercial casinos, continues to support a ban on Internet gambling ``as it exists today,'' while holding out the option of backing a system in which online casinos are regulated and taxed.

But Nevada Sen. Harry Reid, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, said late last year that online gambling is still ``ripe for cheating'' and should be banned.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Maybe theres hope that not everything needs the government sitting on it. :nono:
 

Blazer

ontherocks
Forum Member
Jan 4, 2003
3,201
3
0
49
Nashville
www.madjacksports.com
government

government

I still do not understand why marijuana isn?t legal and taxed. I don?t think the government will ever pull this together. Too many people want a piece of the pie. The only reason some senators (etc.) are getting involved is they see the $$$ that are produced and they want a cut. :cool:
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
51
I have a question. Since cigarettes would cost about $0.75 if it weren't for normal taxes, sin taxes, and tax taxes--are you ready to pony up 15% juice instead of 10% juice to pay those taxes. This is where this is heading if you don't see the light, yet.

It's hard enough to collect with 10% juice. Higher juices means harder winnings.
 

Blazer

ontherocks
Forum Member
Jan 4, 2003
3,201
3
0
49
Nashville
www.madjacksports.com
bush_smoke2.gif
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
fellas

we are talking billions of dollars here. The way I read it it won't mean higher juice for us.

What they really want is the ability to tax the off shore companys like they do Las Vegas. Thats where the money is. If they can find a way to cut the offshores out and give all the money to Las Vegas then they will have it much easier to track.

There is no way they can stop us from online gambling. It wont happen. There is too much money crossing hands. The states are pissed they are not collecting on this industry.

Sit tight, things will work out.


Scott King of Dogs
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top