these guys are smart...much smarter than our politicians...
""One piece of legislation in the works is the End Racial Profiling Act. It is an important priority of Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, whose district includes one of the largest Muslim populations in the country. Conyers introduced the bill in 2004 and 2005, but it went nowhere. Now the alignment of forces may be changing. Conyers will probably be chairman of the House Judiciary Committee when the new Democratic-controlled Congress convenes next month.
Nancy Pelosi, who called herself a “proud” cosponsor of the Profiling Act in 2004, is the incoming House speaker. And in January, Ellison, who represents the district where the imams incident occurred, will take his seat in Congress.
The act, although it doesn’t as yet impose large penalties, would bar any federal, state or local law enforcement agency from “relying, to any degree, on race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion in selecting which individuals to subject to routine or spontaneous investigatory activities.” That would include questioning, searches and seizures.
One of the act’s central features is its definition of illegal profiling. Under it, if airport security personnel question passengers who are disproportionately Muslim or of Middle Eastern descent, this alone would constitute a presumptive violation of the law. Law enforcement agencies would bear the burden of proving that discrimination was not the cause.
What would the effect of such a law be?
“A law that would compel security professionals to focus on keeping their statistics within certain norms rather than on their mission keeping airline travel safe would have a devastating effect on our ability to ensure airline safety,” said Daniel Horan of the Los Angeles Police Department in an interview. He worked at the Los Angeles airport on profiling-related issues for 6 years.
In the past few weeks the public relations campaign for the Profiling Act has moved into high gear. On Tuesday, the Council on American-Islamic Relations advised American Muslims to beware of the dangers of “flying while Muslim.” In light of recent allegations of “airport profiling,” it said, the council has set up a toll-free hotline for pilgrims traveling to Mecca for the hajj, or annual pilgrimage, who believe that their rights have been violated.
The End of Racial Profiling Act has languished until now. What did it need to reinvigorate it? New congressional leadership, and that’s coming in January. But it needed something else in this media age: a high-profile incident to jump-start it.""
katherine kersten...the star tribune..
"""""A law that would compel security professionals to focus on keeping their statistics within certain norms"""""....
gardenweasel/(sarcasm tag in full on mode):"uh, sorry mr. attah...here's your box cutter back...i swear i wasn't profiling you; please don't report me..... have a nice flight..."
/airport security
just imagine... in that kind of situation, this law would "compel" the security guard to let the man pass, because the airline already met it's 'non-white' quota for the day..... he'd have to spend hours later explaining that he's not a racist, and probably filling out meaningless paperwork......and worrying about losing his job...
intimidation of security personnel and the weakening of security controls...that`s what this is all about....their tools are the media and our gutless, vote-pandering politicians.....
these s.o.b.`s are smart...they use our system against us....and we`re not smart enough to adjust...
warm up the car, honey...we're driving...
""One piece of legislation in the works is the End Racial Profiling Act. It is an important priority of Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, whose district includes one of the largest Muslim populations in the country. Conyers introduced the bill in 2004 and 2005, but it went nowhere. Now the alignment of forces may be changing. Conyers will probably be chairman of the House Judiciary Committee when the new Democratic-controlled Congress convenes next month.
Nancy Pelosi, who called herself a “proud” cosponsor of the Profiling Act in 2004, is the incoming House speaker. And in January, Ellison, who represents the district where the imams incident occurred, will take his seat in Congress.
The act, although it doesn’t as yet impose large penalties, would bar any federal, state or local law enforcement agency from “relying, to any degree, on race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion in selecting which individuals to subject to routine or spontaneous investigatory activities.” That would include questioning, searches and seizures.
One of the act’s central features is its definition of illegal profiling. Under it, if airport security personnel question passengers who are disproportionately Muslim or of Middle Eastern descent, this alone would constitute a presumptive violation of the law. Law enforcement agencies would bear the burden of proving that discrimination was not the cause.
What would the effect of such a law be?
“A law that would compel security professionals to focus on keeping their statistics within certain norms rather than on their mission keeping airline travel safe would have a devastating effect on our ability to ensure airline safety,” said Daniel Horan of the Los Angeles Police Department in an interview. He worked at the Los Angeles airport on profiling-related issues for 6 years.
In the past few weeks the public relations campaign for the Profiling Act has moved into high gear. On Tuesday, the Council on American-Islamic Relations advised American Muslims to beware of the dangers of “flying while Muslim.” In light of recent allegations of “airport profiling,” it said, the council has set up a toll-free hotline for pilgrims traveling to Mecca for the hajj, or annual pilgrimage, who believe that their rights have been violated.
The End of Racial Profiling Act has languished until now. What did it need to reinvigorate it? New congressional leadership, and that’s coming in January. But it needed something else in this media age: a high-profile incident to jump-start it.""
katherine kersten...the star tribune..
"""""A law that would compel security professionals to focus on keeping their statistics within certain norms"""""....
gardenweasel/(sarcasm tag in full on mode):"uh, sorry mr. attah...here's your box cutter back...i swear i wasn't profiling you; please don't report me..... have a nice flight..."
/airport security
just imagine... in that kind of situation, this law would "compel" the security guard to let the man pass, because the airline already met it's 'non-white' quota for the day..... he'd have to spend hours later explaining that he's not a racist, and probably filling out meaningless paperwork......and worrying about losing his job...
intimidation of security personnel and the weakening of security controls...that`s what this is all about....their tools are the media and our gutless, vote-pandering politicians.....
these s.o.b.`s are smart...they use our system against us....and we`re not smart enough to adjust...
warm up the car, honey...we're driving...
