Fox pulls campaign ad

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
A Fox affiliate television station rejected a campaign commercial for a Democrat running in a local race, and the candidate alleges it's because the ad slams President Bush.

Brian Ellner, one of nine Democrats running for Manhattan borough president, said Tuesday that the station had agreed to air his ad leading up to the Sept. 13 primary.

But Fox 5 pulled out of the deal after it saw the 30-second ad, which features Bush's head superimposed onto a bare torso as the voiceover intones, "He claims he's a uniter, but New Yorkers know the emperor has no clothes."

Ellner's commercial has already drawn attention because it concludes with a scene in which he throws his arm around his partner of three years. His campaign says no openly gay candidates for public office have ever featured their significant others in political advertisements.

Ellner said Fox told the campaign media adviser and the ad buyer that the spot was refused because it was "disrespectful to the office of the president."

WNYW Fox 5 spokeswoman Brandii Toby said, "We're not running the ad." But she said the station had no comment on why the decision was made or who was responsible for it.

Ellner spent about $290,000 to air the spot for two weeks on several network and cable affiliates, campaign manager David Meadvin said. No other stations refused to run it.

Meadvin said the campaign was considering filing a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission, which regulates broadcast channels
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
51
Why would it be wrong for a station to decide who advertises. If they do not want to take the revenue, then so be it.

Are there laws against this?
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Air time has to be equal someway for everyone who ask. Some BS law like that.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,518
215
63
Bowling Green Ky
I remember the reverse when Staples pulled their ad from Sinclair stations--
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48745-2005Jan4.html

Public has right to respond how they see fit--our entire office bldg-(6 businesses) did what we deemed just and quit using Staples who previously had supplied entire bldg.As well as sent emails to others we thought might be on same wve length.

Made my day to respond when they asked why we quit using them.:)

--or maybe event that happened this Tuesday is more relevent--Washington Post pulled out of free ad donation for walk and concert by Clint Black in honor of 911 victims and our troops.
 
Last edited:

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
DTb,


The only difference with Staples was that Sinclair did not offer a alternative to the garbage that they were airing which in itself is questionable. In this case I am under the impression that this Fox Channel is allowing others to place their political ads.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top