hasnt the over

[thekidwhocould]

hasnt the over hit every monday night this year?
with that thought in mind i'll take the under 47 and hope bettis gets him about 35 carries. gl

 

[i'm not the one]

stl. vs tb went under and depending on the line you got in wash vs phil you may have got a push

 

[thekidwhocould]

oh yeah. thanks.

 

[i'm not the one]

NOT TO MENTION THE LAST TIME PITT PLAYED ON MONDAY NIGHT, DAMN KORDELL GOT THE OVER PERSONALLY HIMSELF WITH THAT QB SNEAK WITH .03 SEC LEFT OR SOME SHIT LIKE THAT....KORDELL IS NOT PLAYING THIS GAME.... lets have an under this time shall we???

 

[theGibber1]

i like the under also.. but what does 6 diff games with 12 diff teams have to do w/ this week?

not trying to be a smart ass, i just dont put alot of this type of logic into my plays..

and not just this stat but the other ones like it.. that happened years ago especially
like Pitt being 17-4 against indy??

what do those games have to do with anything???

what do you guys think??



good luck to us on the under!

 

[i'm not the one]

ohhh yes i agree 100% gibber....it just seems that people like to think everything will come out to 50-50...what i am saying here is for example....say pitt won the last four meetings.....people sometimes generally think THIS NEXT GAME HAS TO GO INDYS WAY SIMPLY BECASUE THE LAST FOUR HAVE WENT PITT AND IT ALL EVENS OUT IN THE END......well as we both know this case is not true and you have to cap each and every game differently...that is why i sometimes don't look at past games simply becasue it puts false trends in my mind...its like betting roulette with 8 blacks (i think i will bet red this time IT HAS TO COME IN) RED!!!!! DAMNIT



GL TONIGHT GIBBER LETS HIT THIS UNDER

 

[thekidwhocould]

my goodness, i certainly dont put alot into an over stat like that, but it does make a post interesting when you list your play. surely anyone who has made it this far (madjacksports message forrum) in the gambling world wouldnt give 2 shits about a crummy stat like that or what pitt or indy do against teams that were nikes oe have mothers whose name starts with the letter L

just making it clear!! good luck under bettors

 

[i'm not the one]

(i think i will bet red this time IT HAS TO COME IN) RED!!!!! DAMNIT


that should be BLACK COMES IN mind lasps shit!!!

 

[theGibber1]

teams that were nikes oe have mothers whose name starts with the letter L

LOL

good luck kid!

 

[i'm not the one]

WOW just caught that one lol

peace

 

[thekidwhocould]

thx gibber good luck yourself

im adding the steelers -4.5
just my gut . i see a 27-10 game..(hope its more like a 16-0)

 

[thekidwhocould]

i need some props for this prediction. come on, somebody make me feel good

 

[big joe]

just my gut . i see a 27-10 game..(hope its more like a 16-0) ---"thekidwhocould"

Hey kid', not bad!! Final 28-10
Good job.

 

[thekidwhocould]

thanks joe.

 

[TheShrimp]

nice prediction.

as far as that under went, you got to LOVE a drive that goes 93 yards in 5 minutes, doesn't yield a point and gives the other team the ball on their own 1. What a perfect scenario.

If they kick a field goal there, its within a TD of going over and INDY has better field position.