Here comes the attack on Iran's nuclear program

TheCooler

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 15, 2004
1,515
3
0
I said this was coming by the summer and sure enough Iran is now shitting !

http://cnn.aimtoday.cnn.com/news/st...0050207/0329268178.htm&photoid=20050206TEH08D

RPT-INTERVIEW-Iran would accelerate nuke programme if attacked

By Paul Hughes and Parisa Hafezi

TEHRAN, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Iran would both retaliate and accelerate its drive to master nuclear technology if the United States or Israel attacked its atomic facilities, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator warned on Sunday.

Hassan Rohani, secretary-general of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, also told Reuters there was nothing the West could offer Tehran that would persuade it to scrap a nuclear programme which Washington fears may be used to make bombs.

Asked about a possible attack by the United States or Israel, which have both said a nuclear-armed Iran would be unacceptable, Rohani said: "If such an attack (against Iran's atomic facilities) takes place then of course we will retaliate and we will definitely accelerate our activities to complete our (nuclear) fuel cycle."

Speaking in a rare interview, Rohani said Iran's ability to produce its own nuclear parts had made it "invulnerable" to attack since it could simply rebuild whatever was destroyed.


"But I do not think the United States itself will take such a risk ... They know our capabilities for retaliating against such attacks," the mid-ranking cleric added.


Iran has ballistic missiles which can hit Israel and U.S. bases in the Gulf and has vowed to retaliate strongly should either country try to repeat Israel's 1981 successful bombing of Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor.


NO INCENTIVE BIG ENOUGH


Iran says its nuclear programme will be used to generate electricity, not make bombs. Washington says Tehran is using a civilian nuclear programme as a front for weapons development.


U.S. President George W. Bush has refused to rule out military strikes against Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons. But Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on Friday a U.S. attack was "not on the agenda."


U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney last month warned Israel could in the future try to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. Israel -- believed to be the Middle East's only nuclear armed state -- has not said it will attack.


The European Union, led by Britain, Germany and France, is trying to persuade Iran to turn a temporary freeze on sensitive nuclear work, like uranium enrichment, into permanent cessation in return for economic and political incentives.


But Rohani said even the removal of U.S. sanctions on Iran or security guarantees from Washington would not be enough to tempt Tehran to give up its nuclear drive.


"Uranium enrichment is Iran's right, based on the NPT's (nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty's) article four ... I do not think anyone in Iran would exchange or swap this right for anything else."


EU MUST BE MORE SERIOUS


EU diplomats have voiced frustration at Iran's refusal to give way on what it calls its "red line" -- developing a full nuclear fuel cycle -- saying Tehran's stance is "unacceptable."


Rohani complained the EU talks, due to resume in Geneva this week, have yet to result in anything concrete thus far.


"Our expectations were higher. We believe the Europeans should be more serious," he said.


Rohani said Iran would review progress in the talks in mid-March before taking any decision on whether to resume uranium enrichment which it froze in November.


"If we witness considerable progress in the talks our patience will increase, if we observe no progress, it will shorten our patience. But, as I have said before, the period of (enrichment) suspension is limited to some months, not a year."


EU diplomats in Vienna have told Reuters Iran is breaking the spirit of its agreement to freeze enrichment by conducting quality control checks of enrichment centrifuge parts.


But Rohani insisted Iran was sticking to the deal it made with the EU in Paris last November.


"We are fully committed to whatever we have agreed with the Europeans ... I can tell you that we have not contradicted the Paris agreement at all," he said.



02/07/05 03:29


? Copyright Reuters Ltd. All rights reserved. The information contained In this news report may not be published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of Reuters Ltd.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
We all know Iran should have been first. It's to late right now we don't have enough men. Iran wont lay down as easy as Iraq. We will need to soften them up real good. We need to move some men around. And hope N Korea stays quite. And of course keep Pakistan and India away from each other. We should stickup for India. They at least are democratic and have voted for years. Since voting seems to be so important lately.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
Iraq is still trouble. It's not like it's all good there. We've had some good moments lateley, but there have also been some of the worst casualty days in there too.

A lot of Iran is with us, partly because they are sympathetic with the Iraq majority. Lots of room for diplomacy here. Actual use of military could be a disaster. And by the way, they actually HAVE a military. Something we didn't face in much a measurable sense in Iraq or Afghanistan.
 

danmurphy jr

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 14, 2004
2,966
5
0
Operative Phrase
djv said:
We all know Iran should have been first. It's to late right now we don't have enough men. Iran wont lay down as easy as Iraq. We will need to soften them up real good. We need to move some men around. And hope N Korea stays quite. And of course keep Pakistan and India away from each other. We should stickup for India. They at least are democratic and have voted for years. Since voting seems to be so important lately.
07/05 Thank you We all know?
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Can someone tell me why we are still in Iraq? Serious question. We will have to leave there someday. Why spill anymore American blood. If they get over run by Iran or whoever we can always go in with the shock and Awe, that they can't defend, and fight our war.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,517
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
"Can someone tell me why we are still in Iraq?"

If you quit reading NYT-- watching liberal news networks--and venture outside of Mass/Kennedy you won't have to ask that question.

You might even discover why Bushes ratings jumped to year long high in past few days.
P.S. Your fearless leader kennedy is not too popular even among Dems--just in case you missed that also ;)
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
we should move our troops back to Eastern Europe and occupy Germany - good point StevieD

why do we even have a military? we should be able to just use a good firm handshake for our foreign policy
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Ok, you have called me names now please answer the question. Why are we still there risking American lives. Saddam is gone, there were no WMD. Do you consider Iraq to be an immediate threat to the United States? With what would they attack. It is not up to us to defend Iraq. If Iran or anybody else wants to get involved then we have the capability of bombing the crap out of them. That would be using our military for what it was intended to do, not nation build.
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
91
CORCORAN, CA
StevieD said:
Why are we still there risking American lives. Saddam is gone, there were no WMD. Do you consider Iraq to be an immediate threat to the United States?

Steve Steve Steve you complete dumbshhit......with what would Saddam attack with???? Are you high??? .....

Charles Darfur, who lead the Iraq WMD investigation said they have SOLID evidence that Saddam was STILL pursuing nukes!!! Didn't you read the report you idiot???????...didn't think so

----- here's a couple quotes for ya.....explain this Steveieboy................................................................................................

"I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Crying sore loser John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Drunk Murderer Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002

"America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." -- Family Feud Game Show Host John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"
Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -- San Francisco-style liberal Nancy Pelosi, November 16, 2002
We are now in Iraq risking lives because we are AT WAR. What rock have you been under??? Do you even know who we are fighting in Iraq???? AL QUEDA......... Do you know who killed 3,000+ Americans on 9/11? .......yeeeppp, you guessed it....AL QUEDA. We are there because if we leave Iraq Al Queda will laugh at us and WIN!!! ...wake the hell up. -- AMERICA WILL NOT RUN AWAY LIKE PUSSIES

All this anti-American shit you hear from the crybaby liberals is nothing but a prolonged drawn out temper tantrum....nothing but whining and complaining as usual. :mj07: It's cool --- THE RED STATES WILL ONLY GET REDDER!!... :clap: Americans dont like pussies.

Our people have voted and we chose by over 3-Million votes to support a President who wants to be STRONG and take the battle to the enemy so we do not have to fight them here on American soil.

Please address those quotes by your liberal leaders okay???????...any way you can grow the balls enough to do that????
 
Last edited:

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Manson, I never said those guys you quote were right. I see that you along with the rest of the Bush Boys can't answer my question. But thank you for the quotes, glad to see you agreed with them even though I did not.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top