How Are These Contracts Obtained?

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
Bush Cronies to Mop Up Katrina

Reuters

11:40 AM Sep. 10, 2005 PT


WASHINGTON -- Companies with ties to the Bush White House and the former head of FEMA are clinching some of the administration's first disaster relief and reconstruction contracts in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

At least two major corporate clients of lobbyist Joe Allbaugh, President George W. Bush's former campaign manager and a former head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, have already been tapped to start recovery work along the battered Gulf Coast.


One is Shaw Group and the other is Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root. Vice President Dick Cheney is a former head of Halliburton.

Bechtel National, a unit of San Francisco's Bechtel, has also been selected by FEMA to provide short-term housing for people displaced by the hurricane. Bush named Bechtel's CEO to his Export Council and put the former CEO of Bechtel Energy in charge of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

Experts say it has been common practice in both Republican and Democratic administrations for policy makers to take lobbying jobs once they leave office, and many of the same companies seeking contracts in the wake of Hurricane Katrina have already received billions of dollars for work in Iraq.

Halliburton alone has earned more than $9 billion. Pentagon audits released by Democrats in June showed $1.03 billion in "questioned" costs and $422 million in "unsupported" costs for Halliburton's work in Iraq.

But the web of Bush administration connections is attracting renewed attention from watchdog groups in the post-Katrina reconstruction rush. Congress has already appropriated more than $60 billion in emergency funding as a down payment on recovery efforts projected to cost well over $100 billion.

"The government has got to stop stacking senior positions with people who are repeatedly cashing in on the public trust in order to further private commercial interests," said Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight.

Allbaugh formally registered as a lobbyist for Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root in February. In lobbying disclosure forms filed with the Senate, Allbaugh said his goal was to "educate the congressional and executive branch on defense, disaster relief and homeland security issues affecting Kellogg Brown and Root."

Melissa Norcross, a Halliburton spokeswoman, said Allbaugh has not, since he was hired, "consulted on any specific contracts that the company is considering pursuing, nor has he been tasked by the company with any lobbying responsibilities."

Allbaugh is also a friend of Michael Brown, director of FEMA who was removed as head of Katrina disaster relief and sent back to Washington amid allegations he had padded his resume.

A few months after Allbaugh was hired by Halliburton, the company retained another high-level Bush appointee, Kirk Van Tine. Van Tine registered as a lobbyist for Halliburton six months after resigning as deputy transportation secretary, a position he held from December 2003 to December 2004.

On Friday, Kellogg Brown & Root received $29.8 million in Pentagon contracts to begin rebuilding Navy bases in Louisiana and Mississippi. Norcross said the work was covered under a contract that the company negotiated before Allbaugh was hired.

Halliburton continues to be a source of income for Cheney, who served as its chief executive officer from 1995 until 2000 when he joined the Republican ticket for the White House. According to tax filings released in April, Cheney's income included $194,852 in deferred pay from the company, which has also won billion-dollar government contracts in Iraq.

Cheney's office said the amount of deferred compensation is fixed and is not affected by Halliburton's current economic performance or earnings.

Allbaugh's other major client, Baton Rouge-based Shaw Group, has updated its website to say: "Hurricane Recovery Projects -- Apply Here!"

Shaw said on Thursday it has received a $100 million emergency FEMA contract for housing management and construction. Shaw also clinched a $100 million order on Friday from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Shaw Group spokesman Chris Sammons said Allbaugh was providing the company with "general consulting on business matters," and would not say whether he played a direct role in any of the Katrina deals. "We don't comment on specific consulting activities," he said.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Tons of contractors can do these jobs. So it will be hard for these boys to say only a few can handle job. And why are they moving so many of those who can do job so many miles away.
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
Thanks for the response DJV.

I still wonder how the bidding goes?

Thought I'd see a "couple" more interested in the subject.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,518
215
63
Bowling Green Ky
don't know how bidding goes IO--and tough to sort out from liberal media per below--but would say most in power will help their own if possible--You will note from below per Reuters story above it not always what they tell you but what they don't tell you--media can slant it as they see fit--it is up to each to discover the fair and balanced truth--We report you decide ;)


Reuters reports that companies with a web of connections to the Bush administration are winning the first contracts to rebuild New Orleans. The story notes that the Shaw Group (search) of Baton Rouge, which has been awarded $200 million in clean-up contracts, employs former Bush campaign manager and FEMA director Joe Allbaugh (search) to provide "general business consulting."

The Shaw Group's founder and CEO is J.M. Bernhard of Baton Rouge, Louisiana who is the chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party and was co-chairman Governor Kathleen Blanco's transition committee, a fact left out of the Reuters story.

How many people scan headines and make opinions without further investigation??

Do you think---
"Bush Cronies to Mop Up Katrina" is anywhere near accurate assessment? despite Reuters intentions to appear so.?? -- what % come away with that view after reading--Does anyone really think the liberal press does not munipulate the cool-aid crowd :)
 
Last edited:

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
Thanks for the insight DTB.

The one thing I noticed about the story myself is that the money involved, the actual amounts that each company is getting in business, are rather small compared to the entire 60 billion (soon to be 100 billion) currently accessed for the disaster. It would seem they chose these little particles to shed light on for other reasons.

My second question would be, does Reuters know where the heck the rest of the 100 billion is besides these little episodes they chose to highlight?
 

shamrock

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
8,430
454
83
Boston, MA
Halliburton received several no bid contracts for their work in Iraq. one such contract named" sole logistical provider" for the United states military.
 

ferdville

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 24, 1999
3,165
5
0
78
So Cal
"The Shaw Group's founder and CEO is J.M. Bernhard of Baton Rouge, Louisiana who is the chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party and was co-chairman Governor Kathleen Blanco's transition committee, a fact left out of the Reuters story."

Don't bother us with the facts.
 

marine

poker brat
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
3,867
73
48
50
Fort Worth, TX
Bidding on these projects is rather complex and takes a good bit of time when an agency puts out a solicitation on the street. What you are seeing here is that the companies (contractors) are putting together a work package and selling their goods/services/solutions to the government.
They will write up a statement of work (SOW) that kinda lays out to the government what they are trying to sell them.
Ex... we will clean up areas x, y, and z and rebuild 10 buildings. It will cost x amount of dollars.

The gov't can then accept or reject that offer or negotiate something different. More often than nought, these contracts are long term, with a gurantee of 1 yr, plus option years. The wild totals that you see the media spitting out are best case scenarios... for the contractors.... i.e, EVERY option in the contract is utilized for the longest possible duration. Its not like these contractors are getting this money up front either.

Contracts are paid a variety of ways, the most common being Time and Materials... where the contractor puts a price/hourly rate on the labor force, and also a price on the materials used and then bills the government based on the quantity used.

The other is a cost plus fixed fee. Contractor buys all the material and labor, then "submits the receipts" to the govt for reimbursement.. and then each quarter they can get their 'fixed fee' which kinda serves as their profit on it. Now dont go getting your panties all in a bunch you hippies.. the max fixed fee is 8%... in pretty much 99% of cases it wont ever go over 8%.
which is fair and reasonable.

there are other ways to secure business with the gov't as well.. and various teaming/subcontracting agreements that need to be met a lot of times... like company X may get a 100 million dollar contract for this.. but they need to utilize 7 small business in the local area and they must perform 14% of the work (which comes out of the 100 million) and other clauses and things like that.

The media is stupid and just wants to spew filth out about Halliburton getting 100 jillion dollar contracts... becuz it riles up the hippies... when in reality halliburton will see about 2% gross margin on that.
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
marine said:
Bidding on these projects is rather complex and takes a good bit of time when an agency puts out a solicitation on the street. What you are seeing here is that the companies (contractors) are putting together a work package and selling their goods/services/solutions to the government.
They will write up a statement of work (SOW) that kinda lays out to the government what they are trying to sell them.
Ex... we will clean up areas x, y, and z and rebuild 10 buildings. It will cost x amount of dollars.

The gov't can then accept or reject that offer or negotiate something different. More often than nought, these contracts are long term, with a gurantee of 1 yr, plus option years. The wild totals that you see the media spitting out are best case scenarios... for the contractors.... i.e, EVERY option in the contract is utilized for the longest possible duration. Its not like these contractors are getting this money up front either.

Contracts are paid a variety of ways, the most common being Time and Materials... where the contractor puts a price/hourly rate on the labor force, and also a price on the materials used and then bills the government based on the quantity used.

The other is a cost plus fixed fee. Contractor buys all the material and labor, then "submits the receipts" to the govt for reimbursement.. and then each quarter they can get their 'fixed fee' which kinda serves as their profit on it. Now dont go getting your panties all in a bunch you hippies.. the max fixed fee is 8%... in pretty much 99% of cases it wont ever go over 8%.
which is fair and reasonable.

there are other ways to secure business with the gov't as well.. and various teaming/subcontracting agreements that need to be met a lot of times... like company X may get a 100 million dollar contract for this.. but they need to utilize 7 small business in the local area and they must perform 14% of the work (which comes out of the 100 million) and other clauses and things like that.

The media is stupid and just wants to spew filth out about Halliburton getting 100 jillion dollar contracts... becuz it riles up the hippies... when in reality halliburton will see about 2% gross margin on that.

Awesome post. That about wraps it up well. :)

Marine, I hope you are involved in many more things in life than posting in online forums :) :)
 

marine

poker brat
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
3,867
73
48
50
Fort Worth, TX
;)
IO,

I write these "statements of work" as my job.
Hopefully I will have some amazing news for the nation about our healthcare system in this country. We will know if we win by early october. Revolutionary is all I can use to describe it.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top