IC: February 10th top play

indiancowboy

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 17, 2006
35
0
0
New Month Begins today as the Books are closed on February.

Up on the week and met my monthly goal of making $1300 to give to my local charity clinic here but just want to point out that including yesterday's moose in the under in the Harvard/Princeton game that went to double OT - heck, it was under after the first OT (Harvard/Princeton Under)


FEBRUARY 10TH TOP PLAY

Dartmouth +11.5 - 2 Units - If anyone sees +12 - Please let me know


Honorable Mention: Michigan over Minny (I have it at 17)

I've thought about this over and over a good bit, and I finally decided on Dartmouth rather than Minnesota.

The total in this game is 102, I can't ignore that and the fact that 11.5 points are being given on this total, which is roughly 10% of the game much like Harvard yesterday but in fact a bit better.

Why is this total this high?

A couple of reasons with one being Dartmouth's record, their relative unattractiveness to betters typicall as compared to Princeton which is more of an attractive team historically to bet on, it is Satuday so the faves are jacked up typically and yesterday's ATS loss by Dartmough when they got beat by 20.

Well, Princeton is no Penn State and they can't put up that many points b/c if you remember, Dartmouth hung in for the most part and today, I think they will play their heart out to make up for yesterday and then some.

Historically, these two teams always play close games:

PRINC 63 - DART 60 (-3)
DART 49 - PRINC 52 (-3)
PRINC 65 - DART 54 (11)
DART 50 - PRINC 42 (-8)
DART 59 - PRINC 64 (-5)
PRINC 61 - DART 45 (16)
DART 60 - PRINC 70 (10)
PRINC 57 - DART 52 (5)
PRINC 79 - DART 68 (11)
DART 46 - PRINC 57 (11)

What does this mean?

Dartmouth would have covered this spread 9 out of the last 10 games these two teams would have played, and of course, you know the oddsmakers known this and hence, a 11.5 spread.

So, tack on revenge here, Dartmouth off a loss, Princeton off a Double-OT win and might be a bit tired, I think Dartmouth loses by 5 today by 56-51.

Hence, another underdog that could possibly win outright.

Besides, the underdog is 8-2 ATS in the last 10 games in this series, Princeton is 0-6 ATS in the last 6 games and they are 0-5 ATS in the last 5 Ivy League ballgames.

Finally, the Underdog is 5-1 ATS in the last 6 meetings and the Dartmouth Big Green are 5-0 ATS in the last 5 meetings in Princeton.

So, in recap, revenge, the point spread percentage differential, the historic background of this series, the underdog and road team typically covers, princeton's lack of covering of late, princeton's double-ot win could be tired and finally Dartmouth coming off a tough loss and Princeton shouldn't be laying this many points to another competitive Ivy team.

If Dartmouth loses, then they lose by 14 with free throws late, but again, I feel they lose by 5 - (51-56).

Take care fellas,
IC
 

dangerously

PLAY BALL
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2006
659
0
0
NJ
Nice analysis, Princeton seems to be living on their past reputation, they're overrated continually. They can slow the game down somewhat but they can't score.

GL.
 

spang

specialist
Forum Member
Mar 22, 2000
4,202
5
0
68
N.E. Ohio
Nice work I C. Its refreshing to see a guy come in here that can articulately put together more than a sentence or two with a solid analysis of a match up. I have to sift through a lot of garbage to find quality posts like this one but its well worth the effort.

Best wishes for continued success.
 

stwoody

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2005
1,775
0
0
No.Cal
Nice work I C. Its refreshing to see a guy come in here that can articulately put together more than a sentence or two with a solid analysis of a match up. I have to sift through a lot of garbage to find quality posts like this one but its well worth the effort.

Best wishes for continued success.

I agree, it was a very good write-up. Great call..........Princeton is a shell up their former selves. Spang, I honestly don't know too many cappers that do this seriously that have the time to write up a match-up. With over 75 lined games on any given Saturday, write-ups are a waste of time, unless you are getting re-imbursed monetarily for it. While I agree, it is nice to see reasoning behind a particular wager, realistically (IMO) writing a 2 page thesis as to who you like, isn't feasible. I would think the amount of time you have been here that you have certain people you follow and trust their decisions? Why waste valuable time going through every post?
 

spang

specialist
Forum Member
Mar 22, 2000
4,202
5
0
68
N.E. Ohio
I agree, it was a very good write-up. Great call..........Princeton is a shell up their former selves. Spang, I honestly don't know too many cappers that do this seriously that have the time to write up a match-up. With over 75 lined games on any given Saturday, write-ups are a waste of time, unless you are getting re-imbursed monetarily for it. While I agree, it is nice to see reasoning behind a particular wager, realistically (IMO) writing a 2 page thesis as to who you like, isn't feasible. I would think the amount of time you have been here that you have certain people you follow and trust their decisions? Why waste valuable time going through every post?

I agree to an extent, just congratulating I C for going above and beyond the norm. I have pretty much quit posting due to the fact that I don't seem to find the time that I would need to provide a more detailed analysis. I like to let people know WHY I'm on a given side and in turn like to know WHY others like a game as well.
 

loophole

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 14, 1999
4,413
149
63
nc
agree spang, im pretty much at the same place, basicly have almost quit posting because im too time crunched to cap and write up. also agree its nice to seem some fresh takes in the forum.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top