IF you want 100% reason WHY TO fade the falcons GET YOUR ass in here right now

[Scrapman]

This is for those of YOU thinking KC will win vs Steelers or Seahawks win @ falcons

The long-standing "Tampa Bay Curse" has been described as the following:

"No team has ever lost to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers during the regular season, and gone on to win the Super Bowl that same season."

It has held true from from the team's inception (1976) through the 2008 season (2008-09 playoffs). The following is a list of the "Curse Victims."



Tampa Bay Curse Victims



*-denotes a playoff team

1976 TB lost all 14 games

1977: NO, St. Louis Cardinals

1978: Min*, Atl*, KC, Chi, Buf

1979: Det, Baltimore Colts, GB, Chi*, Min, Det, NYG, KC, LA Rams* (Rams lost Super Bowl XIV)

1980: Cin, LA Rams*, SF, NYG, GB

1981: Min, St. Louis Cardinals, Det, GB, Chi, NO, Atl

1982: NO, Buf, Det*, Chi, Mia* (Dolphins lost Super Bowl XVII)

1983: Min, Houston Oilers

1984: Det, GB, Min, NYG*, Atl, NYJ

1985: St. Louis Cardinals, Det

1986: Det, Buf

1987: Atl, Det, GB, Min* (Vikings lost NFC Championship)

1988: GB, Det, Buf* (Bills lost AFC Championship)

1989: GB, NO, Chi, Phx

1990: Det, Min, GB, Atl

1991: Phi, Ind, Det* (Lions lost NFC Championship)
1992: Phx, GB, Det, Chi
1993: Det*, Atl, Min*, Chi, Den*
1994: Ind, Det*, Min*, Was, LA Rams

1995: Phi*, Was, Car, Cin, Min, Jax, GB* (Packers lost NFC Championship)

1996: Min*, Oak, SD, NO, Was, Chi
1997: SF, Det*, Min*, Mia*, Arz, Ind, Atl, NE*, NYG*, Chi
1998: Chi, NYG, Car, GB*, Pit, Cin, Min* (the 15-1 Vikings lost NFC Championship in OT)
1999: Phi, Den, Chi, NO, KC, Atl, Sea*, Min*, Det*, GB
2000: NE, Chi, Det, Min*, Atl, GB, Buf, Dal, Mia*, StL*
2001: Dal, GB*, Min, Det, Cin, NO, Bal*, StL* (the 14 pt fav. Rams lost Super Bowl XXXVI)
2002: Bal, StL, Cin, Atl*, Cle*, Car, Min, GB*, Det, Chi
2003 Atl, Was, Dal*, NYG, NO, Hou, Phi* (Eagles were #1 seed in NFC, lost NFC Championship also ate a bagel week 1 @ home 17-0 )
2004: NO, Chi, KC, SF, Atl* (Falcons lost NFC Championship)
2005: Min, Buf, GB, Det, Mia, Was*, Atl, NO, Car*
2006: Cin, Phi*, Was, Cle
2007: NO, StL, Car, Ten*, Arz, Atl, Was*
2008: Atl*, Chi, GB, Car*, Sea, KC, Min*, Det, NO

2009: Sea, GB*, NO* (NO is going to Super Bowl XLIV)

Saints benched final 3 games that year due to injured players they were a 9 pt Dog at Panthers week 17

im adding up to 2013

2010 PANTHERS BENGALS BROWNS RAMS CARDINALS 49ers who got Shutout also 21-0 ;;;;; REDSKINS SEAHAWKS

SAINTS.

Both seattle who was 7-9 and saints lost in playoffs Saints played @ Seahawks but wow favored by 10 1/2 Then seahawks lost at Bears as a 10 point dog

2011 VIKINGS FALCONS lost in playoffs @ NYG 24- 3 as a 3 point puppie MY sports book & local hated my guts SAINTS LOST In Playoffs fav - 3 1/2 @ 49ers & COLTS whom LOST Playoffs @ Ravens

2012 PANTHERS CHIEFS VIKINGS RAIDERS CHARGERS FALCONS Lost in Playoffs to 49ers

2013 DOLPHINS FALCONS LIONS BILLS

*Three teams (1979 Rams, 1982 Dolphins, 2001 Rams) came close to breaking the curse, making it to the Super Bowl. But all three lost. The 2001 Rams arguably came the closest - losing to the Patriots in Super Bowl XXXVI to Adam Vinatieri's last-second game-winning field goal.

*Counting 1976-2008, the Curse has had 186 victims, including 49 playoff teams, 3 Super Bowl losers, 7 conference championship game losers, one #1 playoff seed. Note that the number does not equal Tampa Bay's total franchise victories because many of the victims were beaten by Tampa Bay twice in the same season.





*For 2009, Tampa Bay beat two NFC playoff teams...the #1 seed New Orleans, as well as Green Bay. Results are pending.


EDIT...Seattle was the 187th victim (they did not even make the playoffs), now Green Bay is the 188th victim

so add 22 more teams we have 210 Victims 100% losers playoffs superbowls also .

GO ahead Back the falcons against GB

IN addition to saints winning that year i truly belive that NFL helped them in Playoffs by letting them hammer favre so bad they busted his leg so bad he couldnt run in 4th quater REFS ate falgs whole finals vs Vikes I saw it and the replays are still around

This was because of Katrina destroying New awleans year before I belive they wanted Saints to win that year

 

[T]

Scrap ok so they can't win the SB but with this info it says nothing about them MAKING the SB ? NO ?

 

[deliman]

scrapman

scrapman

can you make exception for alanta to win superbowl I have a future bet for 4000 thanks

 

[BOXLOCKS]

For most of the Bucs existence, they've been a bad football team, so losing to them in years past meant you were a bad team as well, and that's why this "system" exists

This year Tampa went 9-7, they beat 3 playoff teams including wins at KC and at Atlanta (both #2 seeds btw)

So losing to Tampa this year means absolutely nothing, just like the rest of your "systems"

 

[Scrapman]

EXCUSE ME BOX LOCKS YOU said Means absolutley NOTHING


Seattle lost to Tampa bay , Chiefs Lost To Tampa bay , Falcons lost to Tampa Bay also!

OK wise GUY go ahead BET your whole bankrool on The Falcons and cry when you see these fony birds drop the game SUNDAY!


:mj07:

 

[BOXLOCKS]

If the Falcons lose Sunday, it will be Aaron Rodgers and the hottest team in football that beat them, not the fact that they lost to Tampa in week 1

 

[ET4646]

EXCUSE ME BOX LOCKS YOU said Means absolutley NOTHING


Seattle lost to Tampa bay , Chiefs Lost To Tampa bay , Falcons lost to Tampa Bay also!

OK wise GUY go ahead BET your whole bankrool on The Falcons and cry when you see these fony birds drop the game SUNDAY!


:mj07:

They can still beat Green Bay and not win the Super Bowl, Right?

 

[BuddyWright]

Scrap man this isn't the craziest or stupidest system I have ever seen
but it is a funny ass one. Maybe not as funny as the one a guy had about
Teams playing against redheaded QBS before the playoffs but I hope you Tampa system works better than his system worked. Anyway I'll be on Atlanta this weekend and if I lose he'll it won't be the first time bro.

 

[Scrapman]

Scrap man this isn't the craziest or stupidest system I have ever seen
but it is a funny ass one. Maybe not as funny as the one a guy had about
Teams playing against redheaded QBS before the playoffs but I hope you Tampa system works better than his system worked. Anyway I'll be on Atlanta this weekend and if I lose he'll it won't be the first time bro.

well whatever i put this up for your FYI

falcons are losing str8 up

Patriots are losing str8 up also

 

[BOXLOCKS]

for your FYI

Not too good with the acronyms are ya

 

[Scrapman]

OK so Falcons lose the bowl i'm guaranteeing Patriots win n cover the 3 points

Falcons are a fraud playoff team they beat an also ran seahwks team who had a tied game plus they lost to tampa bay also then get a busted up Packers team for easy pickins


Patriots struggle with the BEST D in NFL Ranked #1 across the board then chopped up a healthy steelers team 10 X better than Packers or seahawks.

Falcons will be 4th team to loose a bowl after losing to TB



(Rams lost Super Bowl XIV)

(Dolphins lost Super Bowl XVII)

(the 14 pt fav. Rams lost Super Bowl XXXVI)

Falcons LOSE super bowl LI

 

[ejthree]

I also heard that Trump lost real estate in Tampa....Just saying....:mj07:

 

[PaSprint]

I'm going to have to root for the Falcons simply because I want to see UGA12 hit that monster future bet.

 

[Blitz]

What happened to you saying the Patriots can't win the Bowl because they got shut out? :shrug:

 

[StevieD]

What happened to you saying the Patriots can't win the Bowl because they got shut out? :shrug:

Well this presents a predicament.

 

[Blitz]

Well this presents a predicament.

:lol::142smilie:mj07:

 

[Scrapman]

HERES The actual Defense and offense rankings from full season and it aint even close

HERES The actual Defense and offense rankings from full season and it aint even close

Team Ranks

ATL NWE
Home Record 5-3-0 6-2-0
Away Record 6-2-0 8-0-0
Record vs. Spread 10-6-0 13-3-0
Points Scored 540 (1st) 441 (3rd)

Points Allowed 406 (27th) 250 (1st)

Takeaway Diff. +11 (4th) +12 (3rd)
Pass Yds/Game 295 (3rd) 269 (4th)
Rush Yds/Game 120 (5th) 117 (7th)

Def. Pass Yds/Game 266 (28th) 237 (12th)
Def. Rush Yds/Game 104 (17th) 88 (3rd)

OK yes i did say that when any team got shutout in season they never won a bowl

however it was 3rd string rookie fpr pats and i have to just dissallow it now

Holding that NO TEAMS WHO LOST TB IN SEASON Ever won a bowl.

The year the saints did it they were given finals vs favre Vikings the refs let saints bounty gate him to death busted his leg and ended his career

Saints squeaked no cover 3 pt win - 4 pts

I believe the league wanted saints to win due too destruction of City from Katrina

Patriots finally win and Cover as 3 point chalk .........

Reason is falcons beat two jokes of teams Seahawks just very weak a tied game Plus losing to tampa bay worse offense ever only 5 points scored then they get a truly busted uo Packers team

Patriots had two very tough foes the # 1 defense in league Texans held Brady in check for 3 plus quarters

Then They destroyed a healthy Steelers team also with a strong defense

IF Seahwks and Packers played at NE OMG they would have scored 40 - 50 each game

Brady be on bench 4th quarter LOL

NOT;;;;;;;;;; maybe final 5 mins

Beginning of year Pats SOS was ranked


2016 NFL strength of schedule


9. New England Patriots 134-122 .523


T-1. Atlanta Falcons 142-114 .555 with 49ers


Falcons div teams were a bust TB 9-7 was second Saints Panthers at bottom under .500

YES Pats schedule of div teams always sucko Dolphins however fared well got WC spot

Bills started out winning but wheels fell off and REXY got the BOOT again....

:00x20

WAY STRONGER strenght of schedule here



Sometimes the arc of an NFL team?s season can reflect real changes in its performance, but just as often it?s simply an illusion of the schedule machine: Does the team play its toughest games early in the season, or late? It?s something we can even see coming ahead of time, if we do the math.

For instance, the Baltimore Ravens? schedule should help them get off to a hot start in 2016. The Ravens begin the season against the Bills, Browns, Jaguars, Raiders and Redskins, teams that went a combined 32-48 last year.

But down the stretch, Baltimore travels to New England, Pittsburgh and Cincinnati, three of the AFC?s four best teams by point differential last season. This back-loaded schedule could have the Ravens in playoff contention all year long, creating a narrative that the team ?choked? away a postseason berth after hitting that brutal end-of-year stretch.

On the other hand, you have the New York Jets, whose schedule will be extraordinarily difficult in the early going before easing up late. The Jets went 10-6 last year, but they?ll also be underdogs in each of their first six games: road trips to Kansas City, Pittsburgh, Arizona and Buffalo ? the latter coming on just three days rest ? and home games against top contenders Cincinnati and Seattle. After that, though, the only favored opponent left on New York?s slate will be the Patriots (who they?ll face twice). After a potential 2-4 start, the Jets would seem to be in trouble for most of the season, only to make a ?surprise? playoff push once the schedule softens up.

But both storylines would owe almost completely to scheduling, provided the teams play as expected. In fact, the Jets and the Ravens meet in Week 7, which represents a turning point for each club. Through six weeks, Baltimore has the NFL?s third-easiest schedule, but from Week 8 onward their opponents rank sixth-toughest. Conversely, the Jets own the toughest schedule in the league through six weeks ? by far ? but the seventh-easiest slate over the final 10 weeks of the year. That?s why they exist at opposite poles of the schedule ?loadedness? (front- and back-) spectrum for the 2016 season:
DIFFICULTY OF SCHEDULE*
TEAM UNWEIGHTED WEIGHTED BY ORDER PLAYED** BACKLOADED FACTOR
1 Baltimore Ravens -0.1 +1.0 +1.1
2 Arizona Cardinals -0.1 +0.7 +0.8
3 Oakland Raiders -0.2 +0.5 +0.7
4 Washington Redskins +0.3 +0.8 +0.5
5 Seattle Seahawks +0.1 +0.5 +0.4
6 Indianapolis Colts -0.6 -0.3 +0.4
7 Tennessee Titans -0.5 -0.2 +0.3
8 Green Bay Packers -0.5 -0.2 +0.3
9 Houston Texans -0.5 -0.3 +0.2
10 Philadelphia Eagles +0.3 +0.4 +0.2
11 Detroit Lions -0.2 0.0 +0.2

12 New England Patriots +0.1 +0.2 +0.1

13 Miami Dolphins 0.0 +0.1 +0.1
14 New Orleans Saints +0.3 +0.4 +0.1
15 Dallas Cowboys -0.6 -0.5 +0.1
16 Carolina Panthers -0.3 -0.3 +0.1
17 Jacksonville Jaguars -0.2 -0.1 0.0
18 Denver Broncos -0.2 -0.2 0.0
19 Cleveland Browns +0.3 +0.3 0.0
20 New York Giants -0.3 -0.4 0.0
21 San Francisco 49ers +0.9 +0.8 -0.1
22 Chicago Bears -0.3 -0.4 -0.1
23 Minnesota Vikings 0.0 -0.1 -0.1
24 Los Angeles Rams +0.6 +0.4 -0.2
25 Tampa Bay Buccaneers +0.4 +0.2 -0.2
26 Kansas City Chiefs -0.3 -0.5 -0.2

27 Atlanta Falcons +0.5 +0.2 -0.3


28 San Diego Chargers -0.5 -0.8 -0.3
29 Buffalo Bills +0.1 -0.3 -0.4
30 Pittsburgh Steelers -0.3 -0.9 -0.6
31 New York Jets +0.7 -0.1 -0.7
32 Cincinnati Bengals 0.0 -0.8 -0.7
NFL teams with the most back- (and front-) loaded schedules

*Schedule strength is based on projected power ratings, where a higher number means tougher opponents.
**Quality of opponents at the end of the season receive more weight

Source: CG Technology, FootballPerspective.com

I determined this using early point spreads released by the Las Vegas bookmaker CG Technology. The spreads can be turned into power ratings for each team, which can themselves be used to reflect back on every team?s strength of schedule.

1 (This is a better way of forecasting schedule strength than the traditional NFL method, which simply uses opponent records from the previous year.) To judge the ?back-loadedness? of a team?s schedule, then,

I simply weighted each opponent?s strength by its proximity to the end of the season,2 and looked at which teams saw the biggest difference in schedule difficulty when compared with their basic, unweighted strengths of schedule.

Along with Baltimore, Arizona and Oakland figure to have the league?s most back-loaded schedules next year, with their toughest games coming relatively later in the year. Meanwhile, the Jets, Bengals, and Steelers all have the opposite problem, as their toughest challenges come before the midpoint of the season.

All else being equal ? and in the Jets? case, it might not be (they also have one of the most difficult schedules in the league overall) ? it probably doesn?t matter whether a team?s schedule is front- or back-loaded; one way or another, you eventually have to face all the teams on your schedule. But the sequence of a team?s opponents is important in how it shapes the story of the season, as a few quirks of the schedule can have a real effect on the way a team is perceived by fans and the media.

 

[Scrapman]

ONE thing that i just rembered Patriots were odds on favorite to win the bowl

BUT Knowing falcons will lose we have to give all patsies backers thier cash if they bet on them like week 10

100% losers every team who lost to Tampa bay from 1977 on out

3 who got to bowl lost s/u and ATS Rams only chalked SB team to lose and wow 14 point favorite.

 

[tball]

100% losers every team who lost to Tampa bay from 1977 on out

3 who got to bowl lost s/u and ATS Rams only chalked SB team to lose and wow 14 point favorite.

sooo, in 39 years, since 1977, a team that lost to TB has only played in SB four times? is that right, and apparently they're 0-4?

so out of 39 years, 4 instances? albeit, all 4 lost, for your 100%

why then, like another poster has asked, are you discounting the SAINTS super bowl win in 2009? after they lost to tampa bay in wk 16 - which happens to be the end-all-be-all trend?

16	December 27	12:00pm CST	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	L 17?20 <small style="font-size: 11.305px;">(OT)</small>	13?2	Louisiana Superdome	Fox	Recap

<tbody>
</tbody>

 

[Cricket]

What happened to you saying the Patriots can't win the Bowl because they got shut out? :shrug:

Yea, The Goose8g system!:mj03: