Rest of read here. http://theantimedia.org/police-start-getting-shot/
My best advice: immediately decommission the MRAPs, end no-knock raids for non-violent offenders, make certain the suspect is home and that you have the correct house before executing a raid, issue body cameras to all officers, end intrusive electronic surveillance, decommission the drones, and adopt a ?do not fire until fired upon? policy.
The end result of this scenario will be law enforcement demilitarizing; the only thing left to determine is how many cops and innocents die along the way.
Those in political office do not care about police officers? lives.
The last time the United States came this close to an open insurrection we had a President that understood insurgency.
In fact, he understood it so well that he is responsible for the SEAL Teams and Green Berets having the role they have today.
He understood that once it reaches a certain point, violent revolution is inevitable. He said:
?Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.?
Of course, this is President John F. Kennedy. The threat of open insurrection was during the Civil Rights movement. The reader may still be under the false narrative that the Civil Rights movement was a nonviolent movement.
While Dr. Martin Luther King played an important role in the building the movement that would finally achieve victory, he was most important in the first stage of the cycle.
In the end, it was not ?I have a dream? that forced the passage of the Civil Rights Act, it was ?I have a gun.?
The reader can take a detailed timeline of the Civil Rights movement and compare it to the stages listed above. For the sake of brevity, we will jump in at the point where the targeted killings of law enforcement began. John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert, had this conversation:
Robert Kennedy said
?The Negro Reverend Walker?he said that the Negroes, when dark comes tonight, they?re going to start going after the policemen ? headhunting ? trying to shoot to kill policemen.
He says it?s completely out of hand?.you could trigger off a good deal of violence around the country now, with Negroes saying they?ve been abused for all these years and they?re going to follow the ideas of the Black Muslims now?If they feel on the other hand that the federal government is their friend, that it?s intervening for them, that it?s going to work for them, then it will head some of that off. I think that?s the strongest argument for doing something??
President Kennedy replied
?First we have to have law and order, so the Negro?s not running all over the city? If the [local Birmingham desegregation] agreement blows up, the other remedy we have under that condition is to send legislation [The Civil Rights Act] up to congress this week as our response?As a means of providing relief we have to have legislation.?
John and Robert avoided an open insurrection by recognizing the signs of insurgency and providing relief.
There is no person in political office at the national level that has this foresight today.
The changes will have to be made at the local and state levels.
The reader may be wondering why this historical tidbit was left out of their high school history book.
It really isn?t in the government?s interest to tell citizens that the fastest way to achieve reform is to begin shooting government employees.
Officers and politicians can ignore this article as they have the articles over the last year. If they choose to do so, they should rework their fiscal budget to buy more flags to put on coffins. Those funerals are inevitable without immediate and drastic reform."
My best advice: immediately decommission the MRAPs, end no-knock raids for non-violent offenders, make certain the suspect is home and that you have the correct house before executing a raid, issue body cameras to all officers, end intrusive electronic surveillance, decommission the drones, and adopt a ?do not fire until fired upon? policy.
The end result of this scenario will be law enforcement demilitarizing; the only thing left to determine is how many cops and innocents die along the way.
Those in political office do not care about police officers? lives.
The last time the United States came this close to an open insurrection we had a President that understood insurgency.
In fact, he understood it so well that he is responsible for the SEAL Teams and Green Berets having the role they have today.
He understood that once it reaches a certain point, violent revolution is inevitable. He said:
?Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.?
Of course, this is President John F. Kennedy. The threat of open insurrection was during the Civil Rights movement. The reader may still be under the false narrative that the Civil Rights movement was a nonviolent movement.
While Dr. Martin Luther King played an important role in the building the movement that would finally achieve victory, he was most important in the first stage of the cycle.
In the end, it was not ?I have a dream? that forced the passage of the Civil Rights Act, it was ?I have a gun.?
The reader can take a detailed timeline of the Civil Rights movement and compare it to the stages listed above. For the sake of brevity, we will jump in at the point where the targeted killings of law enforcement began. John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert, had this conversation:
Robert Kennedy said
?The Negro Reverend Walker?he said that the Negroes, when dark comes tonight, they?re going to start going after the policemen ? headhunting ? trying to shoot to kill policemen.
He says it?s completely out of hand?.you could trigger off a good deal of violence around the country now, with Negroes saying they?ve been abused for all these years and they?re going to follow the ideas of the Black Muslims now?If they feel on the other hand that the federal government is their friend, that it?s intervening for them, that it?s going to work for them, then it will head some of that off. I think that?s the strongest argument for doing something??
President Kennedy replied
?First we have to have law and order, so the Negro?s not running all over the city? If the [local Birmingham desegregation] agreement blows up, the other remedy we have under that condition is to send legislation [The Civil Rights Act] up to congress this week as our response?As a means of providing relief we have to have legislation.?
John and Robert avoided an open insurrection by recognizing the signs of insurgency and providing relief.
There is no person in political office at the national level that has this foresight today.
The changes will have to be made at the local and state levels.
The reader may be wondering why this historical tidbit was left out of their high school history book.
It really isn?t in the government?s interest to tell citizens that the fastest way to achieve reform is to begin shooting government employees.
Officers and politicians can ignore this article as they have the articles over the last year. If they choose to do so, they should rework their fiscal budget to buy more flags to put on coffins. Those funerals are inevitable without immediate and drastic reform."
