Judge: FBI Raid on Jefferson's Office Legal

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
glad to see this.

By TONI LOCY
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- An FBI raid on a Louisiana congressman's Capitol Hill office was legal, a federal judge ruled Monday.

Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan said members of Congress are not above the law. He rejected requests from lawmakers and Democratic Rep. William Jefferson to return material seized by the FBI in a May 20-21 search of Jefferson's office.

In a 28-page opinion, Hogan dismissed arguments that the first-ever raid on a congressman's office violated the Constitution's protections against intimidation of elected officials.

"Congress' capacity to function effectively is not threatened by permitting congressional offices to be searched pursuant to validly issued search warrants," said Hogan, who had approved the FBI's request to conduct the overnight search of Jefferson's office.

Jefferson had sought the return of several computer hard drives, floppy disks and two boxes of paper documents that FBI agents seized during an 18-hour search of his Rayburn Building office.

At issue was a constitutional provision known as the speech and debate clause, which protects elected officials from being questioned by the president, a prosecutor or a plaintiff in a lawsuit about their legislative work.

"No one argues that the warrant executed upon Congressman Jefferson's office was not properly administered," Hogan wrote. "Therefore, there was no impermissible intrusion on the Legislature. The fact that some privileged material was incidentally captured by the search does not constitute an unlawful intrusion."

The raid on Jefferson's office angered members of Congress, some of whom threatened to retaliate by tinkering with the FBI and Justice Department budgets.

President Bush stepped in and ordered the solicitor general to take custody of the seized materials so Congress and the Justice Department could work out procedures to deal with similar situations in the future.

The president's 45-day "cooling off period" ended Sunday with no compromise worked out but with assurances from the Justice Department that it would not seek to regain custody of the materials until Hogan ruled on Jefferson's request.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
This seems like a fair ruling to me, without looking too deep. I wonder, though, if this was Tom Delay's or Trent Lott's office if the President would have stepped in and ordered in such a manner? These guys have to be monitored, checks and balances. Seems ok to me, Rep or Dem.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Chadman said:
. I wonder, though, if this was Tom Delay's or Trent Lott's office if the President would have stepped in and ordered in such a manner?

I don't follow, Chad. W stepped in for a democratic congressman to see if the raid was unconstitutional. Don't really see how that could be favoritism.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
You're right, Kosar...I was thinking of something else, mind kind of racing this afternoon. My "Bush bashing" hysteria took over, and I typed some bad info. You know how it goes around here sometimes...see who posts something, dismiss it, criticize it. I'm guilty this time. I remember seeing something about why he was doing it, though, and it didn't seem cut and dried that it was merely to protect the democratic legislator's constitutional rights in this case. Setting a precedent moving forward to protect others, perhaps? I dunno, not saying, just saying. I was wrong though, in this case, to say it the way I did in an offhanded manner.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top