I know a lot about Kentucky football but very little about SC this year.
Everybody knows about how good Woodson is and how he doesn't make stupid turnovers (which is especially valuable on the road). He's an accurate passer, and although he hasn't done so much this year at all, he can make plays with his feet.
UK has excellent wideouts and a terrific possession and big play TE in Tamme.
UK is extremely deep at tailback (the 4th stringer Locke who has terrific speed even played great at Ark. when there were injuries), and they run the ball a lot. UK will run the ball in third and long plays and be successful. The ground game is solid behind that nice, big O-Line.
Defensively, UK has some big hitters and some talent on the D-line, but great runners (like Ark) can go off on them. Brohm also had success in the air as will any good qb and recievers.
I know SC is playing Smelley now and the qb spot there hasn't been too solid.
3.5 seems like a fishy number to me; I thought it would be 6 or 6.5. Thoughts?
Everybody knows about how good Woodson is and how he doesn't make stupid turnovers (which is especially valuable on the road). He's an accurate passer, and although he hasn't done so much this year at all, he can make plays with his feet.
UK has excellent wideouts and a terrific possession and big play TE in Tamme.
UK is extremely deep at tailback (the 4th stringer Locke who has terrific speed even played great at Ark. when there were injuries), and they run the ball a lot. UK will run the ball in third and long plays and be successful. The ground game is solid behind that nice, big O-Line.
Defensively, UK has some big hitters and some talent on the D-line, but great runners (like Ark) can go off on them. Brohm also had success in the air as will any good qb and recievers.
I know SC is playing Smelley now and the qb spot there hasn't been too solid.
3.5 seems like a fishy number to me; I thought it would be 6 or 6.5. Thoughts?
