KERRY FOR PRESIDENT!

^BIGBUD^

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 24, 2004
590
0
0
Subject: Columnist Ann Coulter
on Kerry

Flame-throwing Ann Coulter
provides an interesting take on
John Kerry....

By Ann Coulter:

Kerry was indisputably brave in
Vietnam, and it's kind of cute to
see Democrats pretend to admire
military service.

Physical courage, like chastity,
is something liberals usually deride,
but are tickled when it accidentally
manifests itself in one of their own.

One has to stand in awe of Kerry's
military service 33 years ago.
Of course, that's where it ends,
including with Kerry -- inasmuch as,
upon his return from war in 1970,
he promptly began trashing his
fellow Vietnam vets by calling them
genocidal murderers.

But if Bush can't talk to Kerry about
the horrors of war, then Kerry sure
as hell can't talk to anyone about the
plight of the middle class. Kerry's life
experience consists of living off other
men's money by marrying their wives
and daughters.

For over 30 years, Kerry's primary
occupation has been stalking lonely
heiresses. Not to get back to his
combat experience, but Kerry sees
a room full of wealthy widows as
"a target-rich environment." This
is a guy whose experience dealing
with tax problems is based on
spending his entire adult life being
supported by rich women.

What does a kept man know about
taxes?

In 1970, Kerry married into the
family of Julia Thorne -- a family
estimated to be worth about $300
million. She got depressed, so he
promptly left her and was soon seen
catting around with Hollywood starlets,
mostly while the cad was still married.
(Apparently, JFK really was his mentor.)

Thorne is well-bred enough, to say
nothing ill of her Lothario ex-husband.

He is, after all, the father of her
children -- a fact that never seemed
to constrain him.
When Kerry was about to become the
latest Heinz family charity, he sought
to have his marriage to Thorne anulled,
despite the fact that it had produced
two children. It seems his second meal
ticket, Teresa Heinz, wanted the first
marriage annulled -- and Heinz is worth
more than $700 million.

Kerry claims he will stand up to powerful
interests, but he can't even stand up to
his wife. Heinz made Kerry sign a
prenuptial agreement, presumably
aware of how careless he is with other
people's property, such as other people's
Vietnam War medals, which Kerry threw
on the ground during a 1971 anti-war
demonstration.

At pains to make Kerry sound like a
normal American, his campaign has
described how Kerry risked everything,
mortgaging his home in Boston to help
pay for his presidential campaign.

Technically, Kerry took out a $6 million
mortgage for "his share" of "the family's
home" -- which was bought with the Heinz
family fortune.

Why should he spend his own money?
He didn't throw away his own medals.

I'm sure the average working stiff in
Massachusetts can relate to a guy who
borrows $6 million against his house
to pay for TV ads.

Kerry's campaign has stoutly insisted
that he will pay off the mortgage himself,
with no help from his rich wife. Let's see:
According to tax returns released by his
campaign, in 2002, Kerry's income was
$144,091.

But as The Washington Post recently
reported, even a $5 million mortgage
paid back over 30 years at favorable
interest rates would cost $30,389
a month or $364,668 a year.

The Democrats' joy at nominating Kerry
is perplexing. To be sure, liberals take
a peculiar, wrathful pleasure in supporting
pacifist military types. And Kerry's life
story is not without a certain feral
aggression.

But if we're going to determine fitness
for office based on life experience,
Kerry clearly has no experience dealing
with problems of typical Americans since
he is a cad and a gigolo living in the lap
of other men's money.

Kerry is like some character in a Balzac
novel, an adventurer twirling the end
of his mustache and preying on rich
women.

This low-born poseur with his
threadbare pseudo-Brahmin family
bought a political career with one rich
woman's money, dumped her, and made
off with another heiress to enable him to
run for president.

If Democrats want to talk about
middle-class tax cuts, couldn't they
nominate someone who hasn't been
a poodle to rich women for the past
33 years?

Don't forget -- John Kerry is strong
on defense:
* He voted to kill the Bradley
Fighting Vehicle

* He voted to kill the M-1 Abrams
Tank

* He voted to kill every Aircraft
carrier laid down from 1988

* He voted to kill the Aegis anti
aircraft system

* He voted to Kill the F-15 strike
eagle

* He voted to Kill the Block 60
F-16

* He voted to Kill the P-3 Orion
upgrade

* He voted to Kill the B-1

* He voted to Kill the B-2

* He voted to Kill the Patriot
anti Missile system

* He voted to Kill the FA-18

* He voted to Kill the B-2

* He voted to Kill the F117

In short, he voted to kill every
military appropriation for the
development and deployment
of every weapons systems since
1988 to include the battle armor
for our troops.

With Kerry as president our Army
will be made up of naked men
running around with sticks and
clubs.

He also:

* voted to kill all anti terrorism
activities of every agency of the
US Government

* and to cut the funding of the
FBI by 60%,

* to cut the funding for the CIA
by 80%,

* and cut the funding for the NSA
by 80%.


But then he voted to increase
OUR - the USA's - funding for U.N.
operations by 800%!!!

If you are interested in the character
of the next President of the United
States, please forward this to those
you want to inform.

We do not need a "character" as
President. :142lmao:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top