He paid $9500 for the horse. Kind of knocks the credability of the Derby.
He paid $9500 for the horse. Kind of knocks the credability of the Derby.
Even if he did pay $9500 (which he didn't), wouldn't that knock the credibility of the horse sales and auctions moreso than the Derby??
I dont know what you saying dawg. Are you saying that because he sold for $9500 that the sale in which he sold is not that good of a sale?
Ive heard that the horse was small and crooked therefore the $9500 price he went for. Also a lot depends on the mares foals and what they have done on the track.
My point is why would the price a horse is purchased for have any bearing on the quality of a race.
If anything, shouldn't it reflect more on where the money was spent? And the people who evaluate them? Why spend millions of dollars on a horse when one that, at one point, sold for $10K can win the Derby.
I fully understand that this is the far exception, but my point is the sales price of a horse has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of a race that it wins.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
