SCORING DEFENSE G TD XP 2XP DXP FG Saf Pts Avg
Pittsburgh.......... 8 20 18 0 0 6 0 156 19.5 (4th in conf.)
Louisville.......... 7 24 22 2 0 6 0 188 26.9 (7th in conf.)
SCORING OFFENSE G TD XP 2XP DXP FG Saf Pts Avg
Louisville.......... 7 45 40 0 0 6 0 328 46.9 (1st in conf)
Pittsburgh.......... 8 24 19 4 0 13 0 210 26.2 (5th in conf)
PASS OFFENSE G Att Cmp Int Pct. Yds Avg TD Yds/G
Pittsburgh.......... 8 253 141 7 55.7 1787 7.1 13 223.4 (1st in conf)
Louisville.......... 7 223 154 4 69.1 2165 9.7 15 309.3 (3rd in conf)
PASS DEFENSE G Att Cmp Int Pct. Yds Avg TD Yds/G
Pittsburgh.......... 8 219 104 10 47.5 1237 5.6 9 154.6 (2nd in conf)
Louisville.......... 7 219 122 5 55.7 1514 6.9 9 216.3 (6th in conf.)
RUSHING OFFENSE G Att Yds Avg TD Yds/G
Louisville.......... 7 259 1334 5.2 27 190.5 (4th in conf.)
Pittsburgh.......... 8 309 1025 3.3 8 128.1 (7th in conf.)
RUSHING DEFENSE G Rushes Yards Avg. TD Yds/G
Louisville.......... 7 292 893 3.1 14 127.6 (4th in conf)
Pittsburgh.......... 8 329 1223 3.7 7 152.9 (7th in conf.)
Louisville +8 Turnover Margin
Pitt -3 TO Margin
Despite the Wanstedt factor, I think Palko will be effective vs. Louisville Pass defense:
Prediction:
Louisville 41
Pittsburgh 24
Take Pitt + 21
No opinion on total- I think # is right on.
Pittsburgh.......... 8 20 18 0 0 6 0 156 19.5 (4th in conf.)
Louisville.......... 7 24 22 2 0 6 0 188 26.9 (7th in conf.)
SCORING OFFENSE G TD XP 2XP DXP FG Saf Pts Avg
Louisville.......... 7 45 40 0 0 6 0 328 46.9 (1st in conf)
Pittsburgh.......... 8 24 19 4 0 13 0 210 26.2 (5th in conf)
PASS OFFENSE G Att Cmp Int Pct. Yds Avg TD Yds/G
Pittsburgh.......... 8 253 141 7 55.7 1787 7.1 13 223.4 (1st in conf)
Louisville.......... 7 223 154 4 69.1 2165 9.7 15 309.3 (3rd in conf)
PASS DEFENSE G Att Cmp Int Pct. Yds Avg TD Yds/G
Pittsburgh.......... 8 219 104 10 47.5 1237 5.6 9 154.6 (2nd in conf)
Louisville.......... 7 219 122 5 55.7 1514 6.9 9 216.3 (6th in conf.)
RUSHING OFFENSE G Att Yds Avg TD Yds/G
Louisville.......... 7 259 1334 5.2 27 190.5 (4th in conf.)
Pittsburgh.......... 8 309 1025 3.3 8 128.1 (7th in conf.)
RUSHING DEFENSE G Rushes Yards Avg. TD Yds/G
Louisville.......... 7 292 893 3.1 14 127.6 (4th in conf)
Pittsburgh.......... 8 329 1223 3.7 7 152.9 (7th in conf.)
Louisville +8 Turnover Margin
Pitt -3 TO Margin
Despite the Wanstedt factor, I think Palko will be effective vs. Louisville Pass defense:
Prediction:
Louisville 41
Pittsburgh 24
Take Pitt + 21
No opinion on total- I think # is right on.
Last edited:
