Marines vs the left

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
June 18, 2008
The Marines Vs. Haditha Smear Merchants
By Michelle Malkin

Yet another U.S. Marine, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, had charges dropped Tuesday in the so-called Haditha massacre -- bringing the total number of Marines who've been cleared or won case dismissals in the Iraq war incident to seven. "Undue command influence" on the prosecution led to the outcome in Chessani's case. Bottom line: That's zero for seven for military prosecutors, with one trial left to go.

I repeat: Haditha prosecution goes 0-7. But you won't see that headline in the same Armageddon-sized font The New York Times used repeatedly when the story first broke.

The Times, Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa, and the rest of the anti-war drum-pounders who fueled the smear campaign against the troops two years ago should hang their hands in shame. They won't, of course. Perpetuating the "cold-blooded Marines" narrative means never having to say you're sorry.

It means never having to look Lt. Col. Chessani (charges dismissed), Lt. Andrew Grayson (acquitted), Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum (charges dismissed), Capt. Lucas McConnell (charges dismissed), Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt (charges dismissed), Sgt. Sanick Dela Cruz (charges dismissed), Sgt. Frank Wuterich (awaiting trial) and their families in the eyes and apologize for the preemptive character assassination they all faced at the hands of the hyperventilating, noose-hanging press.

Murtha and company applied Queen of Hearts ("Off with their heads!") treatment to our own men and women in uniform while giving more benefit of the doubt to foreign terror suspects at Gitmo. It is worth recalling, because the press won't do it for you, what they concluded about the now-crumbling Haditha case in the summer of 2006 before a single formal charge had been filed.

-- MSNBC hangman Keith Olbermann, who couldn't wait to define the entire war in Iraq by a single moment about which he knew nothing, inveighed that the incident was "willful targeted brutality." Due process? For convicted cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal, of course. For our military? Never mind.

-- Far-left The Nation magazine railed, "Enough details have emerged ... to conclude that ... members of the 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment perpetrated a massacre." The publication also judged the event "a willful, targeted brutality designed to send a message to Iraqis." Not content with hanging the troops, the Nation pinned blame on the president and a so-called "culture of impunity" that supposedly permeates the most accountable military in the world.

-- Singing the same tune as The Nation, The New York Times spilled a flood of front-page ink on the case and took things a step further in a lead editorial blaming not just President Bush, but also top Pentagon brass for the "nightmare" killings in Haditha. Times reporter Paul von Zielbauer filed over 30 stories on the case, which the paper wishfully called the "defining atrocity" of the Iraq war.

-- Hoping to facilitate a self-fulfilling prophecy, media tools around the world likened Haditha to the Vietnam War's most infamous atrocity -- from The Guardian ("My Lai on the Euphrates?") to the Daily Telegraph ("Massacre in Iraq just like My Lai") to the Los Angeles Times ("What happened at the Iraqi My Lai?") to The New York Times' Maureen Dowd ("My Lai acid flashback") and the Associated Press, which reached into its photo archives to run a 1970 file photo of My Lai to illustrate a Haditha article.

-- And, of course, there's the permanent stain left by the slanderous propaganda of Rep. Murtha -- the stab in the Marines' backs heard 'round the world: "Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them, and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood."

Relatives of the Haditha Marines have called for Congress to censure Murtha, who cuts and runs to the nearest elevator when questioned about the Haditha dismissals. He and the Haditha smear merchants have skated while the men and their families suffered global whippings on the airwaves and eternal demonization in print. Whose "culture of impunity"?
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Wayne (or anyone), what kind of trials were these? Were they handled in military courts, by U.S. government, or what? Just looking for some background, that's all.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
getting interesting--

IN THE MILITARY
Haditha Marine prepares to sue Murtha over smear
Congressman had accused soldiers of killing 'in cold blood'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: June 18, 2008
6:14 pm Eastern

? 2008 WorldNetDaily


Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani

With most of the eight Marines charged in the Haditha, Iraq, incident now exonerated, the highest-ranking officer among the accused is considering a lawsuit against Democratic Rep. John Murtha, who fueled the case by declaring the men cold-blooded killers.

In an interview with nationally syndicated radio talk host Michael Savage, the lead attorney for Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani said he and his client will look into suing Murtha and the Time magazine reporter, Tim McGuirk, who first published the accusations by Iraqi insurgents.

But the attorney, Brian Rooney, said nothing will happen immediately because he wants Chessani, described as a devout Christian and the father of six homeschooled children, completely "out of the woods" legally before any action is taken. The government, through Lt. Col. S.M. Sullivan, today filed a notice that it would appeal the case to the next judicial level.

As WND reported, a military judge at Camp Pendleton in California yesterday dismissed charges that Chessani failed to properly investigate the Nov. 19, 2005 incident in which 24 Iraqi men, women and children were killed.

Rooney, an attorney for the Thomas More Law Center who served a tour of duty in Iraq himself, is urging citizens to tell their representatives in Congress and military officials that they want the case to come to an end.

"At some point you have to have somebody in the chain of command, whether it's civilian or military, saying enough is enough," said Rooney, who served with Chessani in the second battle of Fallujah.

Rooney told Savage the Haditha case is the largest investigation in the history of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, with 65 agents assigned by the government.

The filing of charges against Chessani was approved by Gen. James Mattis, then commander of the Marine Corps Forces Central Command and commander of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force at Camp Pendleton. Mattis has been promoted to commander of NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation and commander of U.S. Joint Forces.

"This is the most important case since Vietnam, if not before," Rooney said. "There's no doubt about it."

He noted the New York Times featured the case on the front page when it was being compared by war critics to the infamous My Lai massacre in Vietnam. But now, with evidence the Haditha accusations were a smear, the story has been relegated to the back pages.

The military judge, Col. Steve Folsom, dismissed Chessani's charges without prejudice, giving permission for the prosecutors to continue trying to build a case that began in December 2006.

Four Marines were charged with murder and another four with not properly investigating the incident.

Defense lawyers contend insurgents deliberately attacked the Marines from hiding places where they surrounded themselves with civilians to use as shields. The defense insisted Chessani promptly reported the events to his superiors and that nobody in the chain of command believed there was any wrongdoing on the part of the Marines.

Libel and defamation

Rooney acknowledged to Savage it's difficult to sue a sitting congressman, but he believes it can be done.

"If he leaves his realm of speaking from the congressman's point of view ? then he can be sued for libel and defamation," Rooney said.

The Time magazine story, according to Rooney, was planted by an insurgent propaganda agent. Publishing of the story was soon followed by a May 17, 2006, news conference by Murtha. The congressman announced he had been told by the highest levels of the Marine Corps there was no firefight and Marines "killed innocent civilians in cold blood."

"All the information I get, it comes from the commanders, it comes from people who know what they're talking about," Murtha told reporters at the time.

Murtha's assertions, however, conflicted with results from the military's own investigations. An initial probe by Army Col. G.A. Watt found no indications coalition forces "intentionally targeted, engaged and killed noncombatants." Later, Army Maj. Gen. Aldon Bargewell found no cover-up.

Nevertheless, the Marine Corps eventually brought charges against Chessani and seven other Marines.

But now the cases against Lance Cpls. Stephen Tatum and Justin Sharratt, Capts. Randy Stone and Lucas McConnell and Sgt. Sanick P. Dela Cruz have been dropped. First Lt. Andrew Grayson has been acquitted, leaving only the case of Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich untested in court and Chessani prosecutors facing the hurdles of the appeal process.

WND previously reported a military jury of seven officers acquitted Grayson of all charges.

The ruling by Col. Folsom yesterday followed a previous decision in which he confirmed evidence of unlawful command influence.

The evidence indicated two generals who controlled Chessani's case were influenced by Marine lawyer Col. John Ewers, who was allowed to attend at least 25 closed-session meetings in which the case was discussed.

Throwing Marines under the bus

Rooney acknowledged the Haditha case taken a toll on the Marine Corps.

"There's no doubt it's affected recruiting," he told Savage. "How could you have your sons or daughters join the Marine Corps when you're not sure the government will protect them?"

Rooney was asked by Savage why he thought Murtha, a former Marine himself, accused the officers and enlisted men.

"In my opinion, it's clear it was done during the election cycle, it was done to bolster himself in the party," the attorney said. "He was vying for a leadership position, and if he had to throw some Marines under the bus to do so, that was the cost of power for him."

He hopes soon politicians will weigh in on the case in support of Chessani and the others.

"I would think all politicians, especially politicians that have military records, should say something about this case," he said.

"In a horrible and very complex environment, when you have an enemy that's using women and children as shields, you should always give the benefit of the doubt to the Marine or soldier," said Rooney. "You should never bring him back and put him in front of a court martial."
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
happy they`re off the hook.....hopefully the last guy gets exonerated.......

this is what murtha needs.....

610x.jpg


(with friends like murtha,who needs enemas)..
 
Last edited:

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
Thank you for the post Spy and let me copy thread incase you try and delete it.
http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle5365.htm

Exactly my point--the same liberal elements that come out with their front page articles of our troops being guilty until proven innocent (then hide stories when incorrect) are the same wanting terrorist to have same rights as american citizens under the "innocent until proven quilty".

They voted in congress recently for increased vet benefits--got benefit I'd like to request--

Give the vets past and present 5 days of open season/per year on anti military/terrorist sympathizing liberal elements within our own borders.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
happy they`re off the hook.....hopefully the last guy gets exonerated.......

this is what murtha needs.....

610x.jpg


(with friends like murtha,who needs enemas)..

i was thinking we could use the enema on murtha......

in his case,it would be considered "brainwashing"(after weasel puts a bottle of tabasco sauce in the syringe)..........


:rimshot
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
It's to bad they had to go though this. If we would stay out of the nation building business we could a-void these things. And were stuck making the Iraq's believe us. And when over 70% of them want us to leave it makes that hard.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
70% want us to leave??--is that the daily KOS poll?

or are you looking at % of msnbc viewers that said surge wouldn't work :)

from nbc/wall st Journal poll this month

"Do you think the U.S. goal of achieving victory in Iraq is still possible, or not?" Half sample (Form B)

.

Is Still
Possible Is Not Still
Possible Unsure
% % %
6/6-9/08 RV
40 54 6
3/7-10/08 RV
40 53 7
12/14-17/07
37 56 7
11/1-5/07
40 54 6
9/10-12/07
37 56 7
7/9-11/07
32 62 6
4/2-4/07
36 55 9
.

"When it comes to the war in Iraq, which of the following statements comes closer to your point of view? The most responsible thing we can do is find a way to withdraw most of our troops from Iraq by the beginning of 2009. The most responsible thing we can do is to remain in Iraq until the situation in the country is stable." Half sample (Form B)

.

Withdraw
Most Troops
By 2009 Remain
Until Country
Stable Unsure
% % %
6/6-9/08 RV
49 45 6
4/25-28/08 RV
55 40 5
3/7-10/08 RV
52 43 5
12/14-17/07
57 40 3
11/1-5/07
55 40 5
+++++++++++++++++++
CBS poll
CBS News Poll. March 15-18, 2008. N=1,067 adults nationwide. MoE ? 3 (for all adults).

.

"From what you know about the U.S. involvement in Iraq, how much longer would you be willing to have large numbers of U.S. troops remain in Iraq: less than a year, one to two years, two to five years or longer than five years?"

.

Less Than
A Year One to Two
Years Two to Five
Years Longer Than
Five Years Other/
Unsure
% % % % %
3/15-18/08
46 22 14 6 12
1/9-12/08
50 24 10 3 13
12/5-9/07
49 24 7 6 14
10/12-16/07
45 27 12 5 11
9/14-16/07
49 23 12 5 11
============================
pew research

Do you think the U.S. should keep military troops in Iraq until the situation has stabilized, or do you think the U.S. should bring its troops home as soon as possible?"

.

Keep in
Iraq Until
Stabilized Bring Home
As Soon as
Possible Unsure


%
%
%




2/20-24/08
47
49
4




12/19-30/07
40
54
6




11/20-26/07
41
54
5




10/17-23/07
42
54
4




9/12-16/07
39
54
7




7/25-29/07
39
54
7




5/30 - 6/3/07
39
56
5
 

Spytheweb

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 27, 2005
1,171
14
0
How many of you are willing to have your son die in Iraq for victory? What ever that is.

58,000 died in Vietnam, than the US pulled out. Yet you can go to Vietnam today on vacation and everyone is friendly towards Americans. What is this victory the republicans are talking about? Oil?
 

Spytheweb

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 27, 2005
1,171
14
0
Thank you for the post Spy and let me copy thread incase you try and delete it.
http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle5365.htm

Exactly my point--the same liberal elements that come out with their front page articles of our troops being guilty until proven innocent (then hide stories when incorrect) are the same wanting terrorist to have same rights as american citizens under the "innocent until proven quilty".

They voted in congress recently for increased vet benefits--got benefit I'd like to request--

Give the vets past and present 5 days of open season/per year on anti military/terrorist sympathizing liberal elements within our own borders.

Right is right and wrong is wrong. These guys who killed this Iraqi may someday be on your local police dept. Because you are in a uniform does not mean that you are always in a free fire zone, like Blackwater, to kill as you please. The US presents itself as higher than the people they are fighting. You must remember, the US are the invaders against people who did not attack us, who did not invade us, we are the Redcoats. Anyone who commits a crime should be tried for it, no matter who he is.

I'am a vet, do i get a choice of who i can shoot?
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
Right is right and wrong is wrong. These guys who killed this Iraqi may someday be on your local police dept. Because you are in a uniform does not mean that you are always in a free fire zone, like Blackwater, to kill as you please. The US presents itself as higher than the people they are fighting. You must remember, the US are the invaders against people who did not attack us, who did not invade us, we are the Redcoats. Anyone who commits a crime should be tried for it, no matter who he is.

I'am a vet, do i get a choice of who i can shoot?

The point is the liberals running anything they can front page for as often as 50 days plus and newsweek/time article having to run retractions on storys dissing millitary-while continueing to pandering to terrorist (or as they prefer to call them "freedom fighters")

and on your combat experience per your previous resume ---would have been confined to fighting over biggest steak in chow line-- so your interpretation of events in combat situations is of little value.

--and your dissing troops is of little concern--however with Murtha we have ex marine --who when converted to liberalism--does 180 and turns on his boys--that is a concern!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top