What do my Republican friends think about the 38 page Power Point plan that Meadows and the Trump Administration put together on overthrowing the results of the 2020 Presidential Election?
Mark Meadows and the Coup Power Point
- Thread starter WhatsHisNuts
- Start date
Reuters reported.
?The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials,? Reuters reported.
?Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations,? the report said.
?Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,? said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. ?Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.?
The New York Times obliviously continued to push the partisan January 6 committee?s narrative that January 6 was a conspiracy that somehow involved Donald Trump and his supporters.
?From a trove of about 9,000 documents that Mr. Meadows turned over before halting his cooperation with the inquiry, a clearer picture has emerged about the extent of his involvement in Mr. Trump?s attempts to use the government to invalidate the election results,? the Times added. ?The documents also shed light on his knowledge and guidance of a plan by right-wing lawmakers to try to use Congress to overturn the election, and how he coordinated with organizers of the rally in Washington that culminated in the deadly riot at the Capitol.?
It is clear what the Times means by ?overturning? the election is contesting the results of elections in states that had illegitimately and unlawfully changed election laws prior to the 2020 election. The Republicans who objected to the 2020 election results were following well-established precedent set by Democrats in 2001, 2005, and 2017. This is a constitutionally protected act and is not subject to criminal investigation. The Democrats, nonetheless, continue to act as if it were a criminal act.
:
.
?The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials,? Reuters reported.
?Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations,? the report said.
?Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,? said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. ?Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.?
The New York Times obliviously continued to push the partisan January 6 committee?s narrative that January 6 was a conspiracy that somehow involved Donald Trump and his supporters.
?From a trove of about 9,000 documents that Mr. Meadows turned over before halting his cooperation with the inquiry, a clearer picture has emerged about the extent of his involvement in Mr. Trump?s attempts to use the government to invalidate the election results,? the Times added. ?The documents also shed light on his knowledge and guidance of a plan by right-wing lawmakers to try to use Congress to overturn the election, and how he coordinated with organizers of the rally in Washington that culminated in the deadly riot at the Capitol.?
It is clear what the Times means by ?overturning? the election is contesting the results of elections in states that had illegitimately and unlawfully changed election laws prior to the 2020 election. The Republicans who objected to the 2020 election results were following well-established precedent set by Democrats in 2001, 2005, and 2017. This is a constitutionally protected act and is not subject to criminal investigation. The Democrats, nonetheless, continue to act as if it were a criminal act.
:
.
No link?
570 "alleged participants" arrested. Bannon promoted it. Alex Jones promoted it and was on site. Trump promoted it and was on site with a rally.
Definitely not coordinated in any way. It was all totally random that all of these people came together.
Mark Meadows had a documented plan for overturning the election results. Who cares right? It's a Republican so you are willing to look the other way.
Any sane Republicans care to comment?
Last edited:
If Trump wins the Electoral College in 2024, would you guys be cool with the Democrats throwing out the votes from states they deemed illegitimate? They will also boot out electors that won't vote how they need them to and replace with patriots that will vote "correctly".
Will that work for you?
This is some third world, Banana Republic shit you guys seem to have no problem with. But, then again, how can you worry about our Democracy when there are illegals crossing a border 1,000 miles from where you live?
Will that work for you?
This is some third world, Banana Republic shit you guys seem to have no problem with. But, then again, how can you worry about our Democracy when there are illegals crossing a border 1,000 miles from where you live?
Are you stupid? No need to answer. In your head anything Trump did just gets changed to Clinton did it.
TDS
Pity really.
The investigation is underway. How do you think this info is coming out? Trump is fighting to keep information from the investigators and several people linked to the insurrection have been subpoenaed.
Sure Gary, Pelosi and Adam "SHITHEAD" Schiff will get to the bottom of it. I hear if the Republicans take back the House next year, they will EXPOSE the Democrats by continuing the Jan. 6 investigation, this time EXPOSING the FRAUD of the Democrat Party.
Hope this helps you.
:0008
This reminds me of a George Carlin line: Think about how dumb the average person is, then realize, half the people are even dumber.
And Shithead Schiff is caught again.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/house...m_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily
Jan. 6 Committee Confirms Schiff Presented Doctored Text Message Between Meadows and Jordan
By Jack Phillips and Zachary Stieber December 15, 2021 Updated: December 15, 2021biggersmaller Print
The House of Representatives committee investigating the Jan. 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol acknowledged on Wednesday that it doctored a text message between former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), excluding content about how they wanted former Vice President Mike Pence to handle electoral votes during the Joint Session of Congress earlier this year.
On Monday, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the head of the House Intelligence Committee, showed a graphic during a hearing on newly obtained communications between Meadows and others, including Jordan. The graphic was displayed as the Jan. 6 panel was discussing whether to hold Meadows in contempt of Congress for refusing to hand over information related to the probe.
The graphic included the title ?Lawmaker Text to Meadows.?
The message was presented as follows: ?On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all.?
?You can see why this is so critical to ask Mr. Meadows about. About a lawmaker suggesting that the former vice president simply throw out votes that he unilaterally deems unconstitutional in order to overturn a presidential election and subvert the will of the American people,? Schiff said.
However, the message was actually a direct quote from former Department of Defense Inspector General Joseph Schmitz, according to The Federalist. The text included an attachment of Schmitz?s determination that Pence could object to electoral votes from states.
The text was also altered to cut off the rest of the sentence, which stated, ?in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence,? the outlet said.
A spokesman for the House panel confirmed to The Epoch Times that the message was doctored.
?The select committee on Monday created and provided Representative Schiff a graphic to use during the business meeting quoting from a text message from ?a lawmaker? to Mr. Meadows,? the spokesman said in an email.
?In the graphic, the period at the end of that sentence was added inadvertently,? the spokesman added, without elaborating on how the error was introduced. ?The Select Committee is responsible for and regrets the error.?
Jordan and Schiff did not respond to requests for comment.
Jordan?s office and Schiff?s office have not responded to The Epoch Times? request for comment.
?Expect a lot more of this. Schiff and the contemptible Jan6 committee will twist and smear the narrative every chance they get,? wrote Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) on Twitter Wednesday. Added Rep. Dan Bishop (R-N.C.), Schiff is the ?Jussie Smollet of Congress,? referring to the former ?Empire? actor who was convicted of concocting a hate crime hoax earlier this month.
The panel, which later voted to hold Meadows in contempt, previously acknowledged privately that one of its subpoenas contained misinformation, but has still not updated the public on that matter.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/house...m_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily
Jan. 6 Committee Confirms Schiff Presented Doctored Text Message Between Meadows and Jordan
By Jack Phillips and Zachary Stieber December 15, 2021 Updated: December 15, 2021biggersmaller Print
The House of Representatives committee investigating the Jan. 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol acknowledged on Wednesday that it doctored a text message between former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), excluding content about how they wanted former Vice President Mike Pence to handle electoral votes during the Joint Session of Congress earlier this year.
On Monday, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the head of the House Intelligence Committee, showed a graphic during a hearing on newly obtained communications between Meadows and others, including Jordan. The graphic was displayed as the Jan. 6 panel was discussing whether to hold Meadows in contempt of Congress for refusing to hand over information related to the probe.
The graphic included the title ?Lawmaker Text to Meadows.?
The message was presented as follows: ?On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all.?
?You can see why this is so critical to ask Mr. Meadows about. About a lawmaker suggesting that the former vice president simply throw out votes that he unilaterally deems unconstitutional in order to overturn a presidential election and subvert the will of the American people,? Schiff said.
However, the message was actually a direct quote from former Department of Defense Inspector General Joseph Schmitz, according to The Federalist. The text included an attachment of Schmitz?s determination that Pence could object to electoral votes from states.
The text was also altered to cut off the rest of the sentence, which stated, ?in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence,? the outlet said.
A spokesman for the House panel confirmed to The Epoch Times that the message was doctored.
?The select committee on Monday created and provided Representative Schiff a graphic to use during the business meeting quoting from a text message from ?a lawmaker? to Mr. Meadows,? the spokesman said in an email.
?In the graphic, the period at the end of that sentence was added inadvertently,? the spokesman added, without elaborating on how the error was introduced. ?The Select Committee is responsible for and regrets the error.?
Jordan and Schiff did not respond to requests for comment.
Jordan?s office and Schiff?s office have not responded to The Epoch Times? request for comment.
?Expect a lot more of this. Schiff and the contemptible Jan6 committee will twist and smear the narrative every chance they get,? wrote Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) on Twitter Wednesday. Added Rep. Dan Bishop (R-N.C.), Schiff is the ?Jussie Smollet of Congress,? referring to the former ?Empire? actor who was convicted of concocting a hate crime hoax earlier this month.
The panel, which later voted to hold Meadows in contempt, previously acknowledged privately that one of its subpoenas contained misinformation, but has still not updated the public on that matter.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-unSep89pyk" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>++++
I don't think Executive Privilege was designed to protect treasonous activity. Sorry lil Jimmy.
