Mine for this weekend.

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
53
OAK -5.5 (now at 5)
Yes, Jets are hot, almost as hot as the Raiders who finished the season winning 7 of their last 8, and really put together their 'D'. They were a 6 point fave to jets at home several weeks ago (push) and that number has been lessened even though they've had the extra week. I think thats primarily due to the jets having finished strong at NE and vs. GB and having completely dismantled the poor poor Colts last weekend. Jets could have won that monday nighter but with the extra week here, the raiders make this one look a little easier.

TB -4.5 (now at -5.5).
A lot has been said around here that I agree with. I've been fading the 49ers for weeks, and left that ship for some reason last weekend. I really don't think SF is too strong a team. They couldn't beat PHI or GB and put a lot of that record (and those stats) together against SEA, ZONA, and STL. Giants 'D' has a lot of holes, but not TB's. SF is going to look like they're playing 11 on 12 this weekend.

PHI -7.5 (+100)
ATL's offense can look pretty poor against good defenses. Vick's ability to scramble hardly makes up for the lack of a good game plan. They were slowed by the bucs twice, the ravens, and the browns. They looked astounding against teams like NO, GB, and MINN, not exactly the defensive stalwarts of the league. I actually think ATL's "D" has maybe been underrated this year, so they could help keep it close, but we're looking at a 10 point win here. Don't forget, this is a Falcons team that limped into the playoffs and played a very poor GB "D" last weekend. They won't be running circles around the eagles.

TENN -4
Their 8 point victory against PITT in Week 11 was no fluke, neither were their late season wins against the Giants, the Pats, or the Colts. Their "D" is playing well and McNair has really been hitting. This number does not reflect the strength of PITT who has been a mediocre team this year, coming out of a pretty weak division. They haven't beat many good teams and have shown an ability to get beat by a LOT. Should be a 4.5 or 5. I wouldn't put them in your teasers. Here's a complete list of the good teams the Steelers have beat this year: Tampa Bay. Their losses have been by 13, 16, 18, 3, 8. When they lose, they don't cover. They don't cover this weekend.

We all know the "bye" teams perform well SU and ATS on this weekend. I always need a good reason to go against them. (e.g. last year, I really liked the ravens against the Steelers. It was their third meeting, Baltimore's "D" had been looking good, and I thought we'd see a close one. So much for that, right?) Anyway, you're just looking at 4 really good teams playing some mediocre teams (atl, pitt, sf) and anything under a TD in those looks good to me. The OAK-NYJ game is a great matchup and OAK has been known to drop the big playoff game or two. I think they roll here this weekend, though, and you can add in a large motivational factor coming from last year's loss at NE.

OAK 1.1 -> 1
TENN 1.1 -> 1
PHI 1 -> 1
TB 1.1 -> 1

Good luck.
 

kbyoda

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 31, 2001
292
0
0
52
Bethesda, MD
Shrimp,

Like your plays except Tenn, but more importantly I like your write ups. Taking all favs this weekend.

Question:

Anybody know what the ATS of home teams covering the last 3-5 years during this divisional weekend? Just curious
 

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
53
7-4-1 ATS for the "bye" team in the 12 games over the last 3 seasons. I don't think that indicates a strong enough trend to make them blind bets. I think it indicates enough of a trend to give one pause before hitting the visitors this weekend.

This is from the thread "stats" (from the Dreyfus thread). I copy & pasted IE's response. Here it is:

2001-2002 season

Wk Home Away Date Spread O/U H Score A Score H RY A RY H PY A PY SU ATS
19 Chicago Bears Philadelphia Eagles 01/19/2002 -3 31.5 19 33 111 87 73 249 L L
19 New England Patriots Oakland Raiders 01/19/2002 -3 39.5 16 13 68 77 297 153 W T
19 Pittsburgh Steelers Baltimore Ravens 01/20/2002 -6 32 27 10 154 22 143 128 W W
19 St. Louis Rams Green Bay Packers 01/20/2002 -10.5 54.5 45 17 91 118 201 265 W W


2000-2001 season

Wk Home Away Date Spread O/U H Score A Score H RY A RY H PY A PY SU ATS
19 Minnesota Vikings New Orleans Saints 01/06/2001 -8.5 50 34 16 127 69 302 286 W W
19 Oakland Raiders Miami Dolphins 01/06/2001 -8.5 42 27 0 140 40 127 164 W W
19 New York Giants Philadelphia Eagles 01/07/2001 -4.5 34 20 10 112 46 125 140 W W
19 Tennessee Titans Baltimore Ravens 01/07/2001 -5.5 34 10 24 126 49 191 85 L L



1999-2000 season


Wk Home Away Date Spread O/U H Score A Score H RY A RY H PY A PY SU ATS
19 Jacksonville Jaguars Miami Dolphins 01/15/2000 -8 40 62 7 257 23 263 110 W W
19 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Washington Redskins 01/15/2000 -4.5 39.5 14 13 44 46 142 111 W L
19 Indianapolis Colts Tennessee Titans 01/16/2000 -5.5 46.5 16 19 78 197 227 112 L L
19 St. Louis Rams Minnesota Vikings 01/16/2000 -7 52 49 37 31 87 374 388 W W
 

Blazer

ontherocks
Forum Member
Jan 4, 2003
3,201
3
0
48
Nashville
www.madjacksports.com
Should I stay or should I go?

Should I stay or should I go?

Shrimp, good post, solid info. <BR>

There seem to be alot of ppl on the fav's this week. You y'all forsee blowouts? I have made alot of money fading joe public and getting what I call "bonus points"(some call it value).<P>

Is this a situation to hold and take the dogs with an overpriced line or is the true value in the fav's while they are still low? I have to admit Atl plus more than a touchdown sounds yummy. In the same vein, SF getting 6 or 6.5 seems logical against a team with a weak running game.<P>
 

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
53
ATL +7.5 looks almost too juicy. A trap?

ATL was palying very poorly coming in, losing to CLE, SEA, TB and going into OT with MINNY.

Besides the rest factor, I think part of the reason faves do well this weekend (and this is not an original theory) is that the lines are shaded because people saw the wild card team play so well the previous weekend, while no one saw the home team play. I think that's in effect here.

The "first game back" for the superstar is also in play here.

That Wk 17 loss for Philly was upsetting, but when they don't overlook a team at home, they tend to cover. They covered at home this year against Dall, TB, NYG, WASH, ZONA, STL, but not HOU (with a 20 pt spread) and not INDY (in what I consider "just one of those games").

When they're prepared, they crush.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,533
289
83
Victory Lane
I have to agree with you Shrimp.

Atlanta Falcons have gone as far as expected. Arthur Blank the new owner is smiling big as no one thought they would even be in the playoffs.

The pressure is off and they will succomb to a better team headed deeper into the playoffs. I see a similar game as when Philly went to Dallas and took care of business.

12/21/2002 Sat at Cowboys 27-3 W -6.5/37 W/U 114 245 359 68 78 146 +1
Yeh that sounds about right. Atl may score a few TDs so lets say Philly 27 Atl 17


Atlanta dont care much for a good defensive team. Vick will be ick.


Scott King of Dogs
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,533
289
83
Victory Lane
here is what Dan Reeves was quoted as saying.


With that in mind, Reeves simply shrugged when someone mentioned going back to the Super Bowl for the fifth time.

``I'm not even thinking about that,'' he said. ``I'm not thinking past Philly. The task this week is monumental.''


monumental - defined as massive, outstanding, very great


Sounds like old Dan has already thrown in the towel to me.


Scott King of Dogs
 

maverick2112

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
2,967
5
38
Wyoming
I think people are looking into Atlanta-GB to much.............The Gb defense I watched the 2nd half of the yr really sucked. GB was a classic case of a team fading down the stretch, the were very lucky to beat Chicago,Minnesota at home and SF on the road. So Atlantas win doesnt impress me that much. Atlanta got an early lead which took all the pressure off of the Offense and Defense on the road. I like Philly this week.
 
B

Billy

Guest
Shrimp........like them all except Raiders.......this may well go to
overtime......( 45-45 )????.....LIKE the over much more......:)
 

kbyoda

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 31, 2001
292
0
0
52
Bethesda, MD
I agree w/ Shrimp and Scott....

When Philly is ready and needs to W...they crush!! LOVE Philly this weekend and I think the Vegas boys new people woulkd wager on an Atl team catching a TD...I like Philly by 10+
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,584
231
63
"the bunker"
i`m very sorry

i`m very sorry

i didn`t hit tampa even harder when it was 4.5(bought down to 4).....as it is,i hit it quite hard.....but these games don`t come around that often.....the giants and browns were just such games last weekend...tampa is another...........to a lesser extent,like the jets at 6.....i keep thinking back to the raider collapse vs b`more 2 years ago......you`ve got a pair of balanced attacks going here....the jets have seen oakland quite a few times the last few years....and are notoriously tough road dogs.......very strong-tampa......medium-jets....
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,769
338
83
53
Belly of the Beast
Re: i`m very sorry

Re: i`m very sorry

gardenweasel said:
i keep thinking back to the raider collapse vs b`more 2 years ago.....

Remember that Siragusa sat on Gannon at the start of the 2nd quarter and Hoying came in. While the Raiders disappointed in last year's playoffs, that was a California team in the snow and they did everything in that game except win.
 

txhorns

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 23, 2002
421
0
0
71
TEXAS
The Shrimp
You have got the philly game nailed. Vick's good,and after last week he thinks it easy sailing. Now, I'm thinking He might find out what Pro ball is all about.
 

Blazer

ontherocks
Forum Member
Jan 4, 2003
3,201
3
0
48
Nashville
www.madjacksports.com
can't wait

can't wait

Kickoff in 24 hrs. I'm going to the Titans game with my JETS hardhat in hand. When the Titans are up in the 4th, I will start the cheer J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS. I don't know if we really want to play the white-hot jets but it's better than playing on the road in Oak-town.<P>

GL ALL-winnem' big:) :) :)
 

TheShrimp

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2002
1,138
0
0
53
kbyoda said:
Shrimp,

Like your plays except Tenn, but more importantly I like your write ups. Taking all favs this weekend.

Hope you played em.

To recap:
3-1 this weekend +1.9.

after last weekend's -.5, up 1.4 on the playoffs.

I also went 2-2 on totals on this weekend, including losing that UNDER on the SF/TB game. 3 points in the second half. The INT called back. My word.

Finished the season up a tad, and up a bit in the post season.

Seen 3.5 and 7.5 for next weekend at SIA. 4 and 8 at WSEX. NO early leans. 3.5 and 7.5 are both exactly what I said to myself yesterday. I like the Raiders laying the points a little.

Do the BUCS finally break through? They probably looked better than the Eagles this weekend, but they were playnig the 49ers. Whoever it is, I hope they play the Raiders. We're going to have a SB match-up with a spread of less than 7 no matter who plays, though, so it should be a good one.

TheShrimp
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top