Monday August 6th

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,081
137
63
Toronto
Monday August 6th 2007

yesterday: 7-4 +6.06
August: 26-20 +6.43
ml 11-9 -0.38
rl 4-1 +3.69
totals 5-5 -1.35
parlays 6-5 +4.47
system picks 2-0 yesterday; 5-5 in August (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)
system totals 3-0 yesterday; 6-7 in August

system sides

team win% (line)value indicator

Hou 54% (+111)+6
Stl 54 (-124)-2
Col 58 (-114)+4
Sf 64 (-181)-1
nyy 60 (-149)even
Det 66 (-250)-6 RL 50 (-118)-5
clev 55 (-109)+2
Tex 52 (+105)+3
bost 56 (+102)+6

system totals

cubs@Hou ov9 67% (-105)+15 --ump N/A
mil@Col ov10.5 65 (-125)+9 --ump N/A
nyy@Tor ov10 69 (-105)+17 --ump N/A
clev@Min ov9.5 70 (+105)+21 --ump Iassogna is even
oak@Tex ov10 74 (-125)+18 --ump N/A


Tigers crappy play was a 9-unit swing for me (2 2-teamers and a 5-teamer)?11 units if they coulda won by 2. That's about the only bad thing I can say about Sunday's results. I went 3-0 on the moneyline, 1-1 on the runline, 1-0-2 on totals and I even managed to get an IF play through to the 7th game. System picks have, fortunately, recovered after their 1-4 start to August. System totals have recovered nicely, too, after an 0-5 start to the month; that's not counting the Lad and Oakland totals as inappropriate umpires seemed to be in play for those?they were fairly highly rated under-calls, so maybe I should have just penalized them as opposed to eliminating them altogether. Oh well; perfection is overrated.

My Monday numbers suggest that there's a bit of value with the Astros, Rockies and Bosox. Rodriguez has poor career numbers vs the Cubs, though; he's been great at home and the Astros are much better vs lefties than are the Cubs (OPS .781 to OPS .715), so the result was a call on the home team. Brewers games are getting very tough to call; Vargas has done good work vs Rockies before and comes in rated a bit higher than Fogg, but I'm giving the Rockies a small edge at the plate for this one, not to mention the fact that the Brewers don't travel very well AND the Rockies enjoy one of the better home-field advantages. Weaver hasn't been sharp, lately, for the Angels, but the club still owns a tremendous home-field record and with Schilling just coming off the DL this one is a tough call; I'll either try the Bosox or leave it alone.

Some minor adjustments I made after the all-star break has resulted in far less under-calls for system totals and a good deal more over-calls. All 5 posted, today, are over-calls and I might bite on a few of those. The Houston call is unlikely for me as Wandy has been brilliant at home and Hill can chuck a great game from time to time; still, Astros OPS at home has creeped higher and higher as each month passes and they do perform much better vs lefties. Rockies game over looks promising but notice the rather low value indicator due to the heavy juice. Yankees have beaten on Litsch before and they've scored 7 or more in their past 6 games; Jays are doing great vs lefties (OPS .842 to end July) but have been stoned on more than one ocassion by Pettitte; I need to look into this one a little deeper; with the Jays flirting with the wild-card race I can't see myself betting against them for the next few weeks, being a pretty big fan. If the Twins had been scoring more runs lately then I'd say the Metrodome total might be the best of the bunch; Twins have scored 4 or less in 12 of their past 13 games; Twins OPS the past 7 days was only .662 while Indians over that period was only .702; I still might give this one a shot as both SP's can be very hittable; 10 hits between both clubs yesterday isn't very encouraging. A's-Rangers might truly be the best of the bunch?it's the highest call, at least; both clubs hitting better vs lefties (A's .746 OPS vs L while Rangers at .774); I have Rheinecker rated fairly low and Braden is only 1 point ahead of him, so the SP's for this one are suggesting the over; A's OPS last 7 days only .714 while Rangers was down at .640; Rangers OPS at home just below .800, not much below their OPS at home last season; Rangers bats not picking up the slack with the loss of Texeira, but this will be their first game at home since the move so you would think that they might be able to make some noise?their poor work at the Rogers Centre is excusable since the Jays staff has been pitching very well lately.

I sure had a lot to say considering that Monday should be very light for me.
I might, in fact, take a pass, or at least wait until I can get some umpire information before tackling any totals (within the last hour before gametime).

Will post plays if there are any.
GL
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,081
137
63
Toronto
some notes on my numbers:

Tigers number has been reduced due to questionable status of Sheffield and, less importantly, Casey. Original call was 69% (dropped it a full 3% as Tigers bats have been quite cold in general).

Schilling not rated very high for this start (for him), but he's still got a couple of points on Weaver (by my numbers) as Weaver is coming off a pair of dreadful starts--his 4.17 era at home, opponent's hitting .282, doesn't impress either. I had the bullpens rated exactly even after my June-end assessments (crap...that's what I've got to do tonight...need to do my month-end bullpen assessments; all my other month-end stuff is done), but I'm giving a small edge to the Bosox pitching due to the SP's, even with (double-emphasis) Schilling rated fairly low (ahem...for him) for this start. I'm giving them an exactly equivalent edge at the dish--small but significant; Angels OPS last 7 days .786 while Bosox over that period was .806, but just about a week ago the Angels 7-day OPS was under .700 while the Bosox was, and is perpetually, over .800; Angels still not hitting many homers and that's been the case for about a month now.

I guess that I'm still considering a Tigers runline play and/or a Bosox ML play, so count this as a bit of an assessment.

I'm still thinking about the Astros, too; the teams vs lefties differential and Wandy's great work at home are tempting me.
Cubs on the road vs lefties are 4-10 (29%).
Astros at home to lefties are 10-6 (62%).
(edited this in; another selling point)
+111...extremely tempting. Wait? I dunno...give it an hour maybe, but I think I'll be on it.
another late edit:
Soriano for Cubs left Sunday's game and is listed as doubtful for Monday.
Taking the +111.

Cards have no value; pass.

Rockies I think I'll pass on as I don't care for Fogg (Vargas either, for that matter); Brewers bats maybe...Maybe...coming back to life. Over looks best in that one.
(editing this in):last time Fogg faced the Brewers at Coors, almost a year ago to the day, he lost 1-0 to Dave Bush (I even checked the umpire--not a factor). Fogg also has a 2.50 era over his past 3 (Vargas' over 6.).
Rockies maybe DO look better than the over, seeing as it's still ...nevermind...down to -113 for over 10.5. I still don't like it, with this new info.
Rockies call at 58% sounds okay...maybe a point or two high...
Half of that (4 of the 8%) is home field bonus & road pena.
I think I'm passing on the Rockies due to my dislike of Fogg.
Passing on the total due to new info.
Write a book?...this post is turning into a book.:com:

Giants are tempting but I hate to lay big juice on the Giants. Nats playing solid ball lately and Lannan might still turn into a solid SP. Giants OPS vs L only .690. Nats OPS vs R only .674. Past 7 days has SF at a whopping .608 while Nats were .908. Wow...that's the highest that I've seen Nats 7-day OPS at. I still think that Lincecum could shut them down here. They'd still need to score. Was thinking SF runline, maybe, but I don't know. Under 8 is a thought, again knowing the ump would help. System call is 62% under the 8.

I don't know if I really believe in Litsch despite his solid work over the past month or so; era's down to 3.47 but OBA is .298. I watch a lot of Jays games and I'd say that Marcum is tops and McGowan is a ways down from there, with Litsch in the rear, I'm just not sure by how much yet. Yanks killed him May 30th at the Rogers Centre (0.2 IP...5 earned runs...see ya). Pettitte threw a beauty against the Jays, at home, July 17th (7 IP, 7 H, 1 R); that and Litsch's surprising work has me hesitant on the over.
Perhaps my bias towards the Jays isn't affecting my 'capping; I've got NYY 60% despite the fact that the Jays are 13-3 at home to lefties (81% winners). That's already factored into my 'cap, indirectly, by giving the Jays a high offensive number due to them smoking lefties and by-way-of the home field adjustment.
Yanks still get the edge at the plate as their OPS vs R is up near .850 while their 7-day OPS has been between .900 and 1.050 for the past 10 days or so.
Yanks a definite edge pitching, too.
I still might try the Jays. As soon as it hits +150.
Jays have won 8 in a row at home.
Probably pass on the over.

Tigers bats are super-duper overdue to win a game on this homestand and to maybe fill the scoreboard pretty good. Over 5.5 runs at -115 is cheaper than the runline and about as tempting, to me. Jackson seems to be either total garbage or pretty good; for 6 starts in July he had 2 shitty ones, 2 great ones, and another where he shut down the Yankees for 4 innings before surrenduring 4 in the 5th; this guy is impossible to figure out. What am I thinking? Play on the Tigers at these prices the way they're going? Fvck that. Under 9.5 is a thought (after just thinking about Tigers ov5.5...stay away from this game, Mike, stay far, far AWAY:com: ).

I don't know about this Indians 55% call.
I wouldn't touch 'em with a 10-foot pole here.
I've got a tiny edge to the pitching and a medium-sized edge at the plate. Twins nice bonus at home while Indians same pena on the road.
Twins winning these days...just not scoring.
Still thinking over the 9.5. If I want it I should get it quick while it's still +105...I don't think that will last long.

Rangers game over just came down in price.
I was in no rush, there.
I already posted (page 1) these teams OPS vs L and past 7.
But it's interesting to note that while Rangers OPS was only .640 over their past 10 (ESPN), they batted .314 over their last 10 vs lefties (lovers).
That is the final piece of news, edited in late again, that sways me totally towards the Rangers (A's hit .229 last 10 vs L).
I have the pitching AND the hitting exactly the same for these teams.
52% is for home. Maybe the Rangers should get more than that, for this one; 1st game post-Texeira at home.
Think I might try them...now at +105.
Don't think it will go higher than that; could be wrong.
Leaning Rangers and over.
Rangers over 5 at -120....looks dangerous.
Moneyline better.
Rangers -1.5 +182 anyone?

Bosox game I discussed above.
One for me to leave alone, I think; lean is Bosox but I might be crazy.
Some people think so.


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please don't arrange to have me sent to no asylum
I'm just as sane as anyone
It's just a game I play for fun


(Asylum,Supertramp)

:SIB
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,081
137
63
Toronto
Don't give me that do goody-good bullshit.

Don't give me that do goody-good bullshit.

PLAYS

Astros +111 1.5/1.67
Rangers +105 1/1.05

wash@Sf un8 -110 0.78/0.72
clev@Min ov9.5 +105 0.95/1
oak@Tex ov10 -107 0.77/0.73

8-team IF bet
1.d'rays under 4 0.62/0.5
2.Rangers -1.5 0.5/0.85
3.Astros 0.65/0.65
4.clev@Min ov9.5 0.6/0.63
5.red sox 0.63/0.6
6.Rockies 0.66/0.6
7.Giants -1.5 0.7/0.81
8.Blue Jays +1.5 1.2/1
0.62 to win max.5.64

8-team IF bet
1.indians over 4.5 0.62/0.5
2.Tigers -1.5 0.62/0.5
3.Rangers 0.5/0.5
4.Rockies -1.5 0.5/0.85
5.Astros 0.65/0.65
6.Giants -1.5 0.8/0.92
7.red sox 0.84/0.8
8.nyy@Tor ov10 0.66/0.6
0.62 to win max.5.32


Going to hope for the best on a couple of home teams in Texas. Maybe I can hit enough to get me my 4th straight winning day.

I've done Tuesday's and there are several that interest me. Phillies Moyer is a perfect 5-0 in 5 vs the Marlins (2.45 era) including 1 gem in '07; at up to -150 and I can't say no vs Vanden Hurt; despite Moyer's work vs, the game will be a system over even at 10.5. Mets call is a little lower but I have more faith in Perez than Moyer so I'll likely jump on the Mets, too, at up to -150 (vs Carlyle); game will be a system under at 8.5 or higher. I like the Reds to win at home vs the slumping Dodgers; Reds have beaten on Hendrickson before and, despite the Reds hitting quite poorly against lefties on the season, I think I'd try them with either Arroyo or Harang at up to -120. Astros Williams has horrible numbers against the Cubs and I might switch sides in that game #2 and take 'em if they're -120 or better; need to know that Soriano will be playing first; this game will be a system over at up to a 10. Padres Peavy over Cards Reyes, for a lot of good reasons; I might go as high as -165 here; might play the Cards under 4 runs, if I can get a 4, especially if Wells baffles the Cards today. Brewers-Rockies game is a tough call (Capuano-Hirsh); best to see what transpires in game #1 today; game would be a system over at up to 9.5?total will likely be higher than that. Don't like the Pirates-D'Backs game whether it's a hurt Gorzelanny or a mediocre Maholm going; Owings has been trash up until his last start which was very good. Bacsik-Zito would be a system under if we see a 9, but an 8.5 is likely; side is an impossible call the way the Nationals are playing lately. Nats as big dogs would tempt me, espeically if they make a game of it tonight. Holy cow I'm covering them all?new paragraph for the AL?

Trachsel is 0-4 (in 4) with an 8.05 era vs the M's, and he hasn't been too hot in general, lately; Weaver has been so-so last couple but I'd try the M's at up to -120?maybe -125 if I make some coin Monday; game will be a system over at up to a 10?I think that I'd try it at that. My Tigers call (Robertson-Hammel) is going to be surprisingly low as D'Rays are outperforming the Tigers at the plate lately and, a couple of factors more important, D'Rays are OPS .800 vs lefties AND Nate's career numbers vs the D'Rays are 0-3, 5.94 era in 4, including taking a beating in an '07 game at Tropicana Field; Hammel hasn't really been shelled in any of his 3 '07 starts, he's just done poor work out of the pen and has walked too many batters; D'Rays might make a game of this; at +150 or higher I think that there will be some value; at +180 they might actually be a system pick, as long as the Tigers don't rebound and score 6 or more today; status of Sheffield and others will important here; game would be a system over at a 9 but I'll fall off my chair if we see a total that low. I'm going to have a monster number for the Yankees (Clemens-Towers), especially if they do the two-step on Litsch today; line will be outta sight and I'll take a pass regardless?even on the tempting runline?as I'm rooting hard for the Jays in this series (still a dreamer, at heart); game will be a system over even at 10.5?that actually might change if they don't bust the total this afternoon. I'll take a shot with the Royals (Bannister-Bonser); I'll like it even more if the Twins bats continue to put up low numbers while facing Byrd today, whether or not they win; probably be a moment of rare juice for the Royals but I can't pass up to -120...might even be cheaper...not sure what to expect on this one. Indians Westbrook (vs Danks) has poor numbers vs the Pale Hose, but I have still have him rated higher than Danks for this game; Indians edge at the plate, too, will give me a call close to 60% so I'll be looking for a line of -120 or better, which is likely not to come. I'll have the Rangers, again, as a slight favorite over the A's and the struggling Gaudin; similar dog-money might tempt me here; I'll especially like it if the Rangers can win tonight, preferrably scoring 5 or more times, but if they open at +120 or better then I probably won't wait. Last (and maybe least), I'll have the Angels in the mid-50's (Saunders-Wakefield); line is likely -110 to -130 Angels, meaning little or no value there.

I might just cut-and-paste this into tomorrow's post?included a fair bit of info, or at least opinions.

Hopin' for streakin'.
I need to score number four before I can be alive for five.
Them's the word.
GL
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top