More Consolidation of The Media

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
More consolidation means less voices heard!


WASHINGTON (Hollywood Reporter) - News Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch's attempt to gain control of the nation's largest satellite television company was warmly received by the GOP-controlled House Judiciary Committee on Thursday as Republican reaction to the $6.6 billion deal fell just short of fawning.

Lawmaker after lawmaker praised the media mogul's business acumen and entrepreneurial spirit during Thursday's hearing examining his deal to gain a controlling interest in DirecTV.

Committee chairman Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., R-Wis., summed up the feelings of his Republican colleagues when he thanked Murdoch for attending, saying: "When my wife doesn't get a good dose of Fox News every day she gets grumpy, so there are some of us who appreciate what you are doing."

Sensenbrenner said he planned to send a transcript of the hearing to the Justice Department so it could have the benefit of the committee's deliberations. Both the Justice Department and the FCC have to examine the deal to ensure that it does not violate antitrust laws or harm the public interest.

While Republicans praised Murdoch, most Democrats were chafing under the strict rules of examination imposed on the witnesses. Sensenbrenner told committee members he would gavel out of order any lawmaker who strayed beyond the narrow antitrust scope of the committee's jurisdiction.

Michigan Democratic Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., found Sensenbrenner's iron hand particularly galling, considering that more Democrats turned out for the hearing than Republicans.

When asked what issues he was being prevented from examining, the senior Democrat on the committee said in an interview: "The connections between (Fox News chairman and CEO) Roger Ailes and the White House. What the hell is that all about? It's like there's a direct line between the administration and Ailes. You can see it. There are plenty of political and policy implications in that."

Sensenbrenner was not entirely successful in keeping Democratic ire out of the record as Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., told Murdoch that he was "scaring the hell out of her."

Waters contends that Murdoch's increasingly dominant media empire is squeezing out other, more liberal voices.

"When they use the term fair and balanced reporting, it really means conservative and biased," she said.

Murdoch defended his network, arguing that it actually has injected a new voice into the media marketplace, first with the Fox Network and more recently with the cable Fox News Network.

"I don't concede to you what you say about Fox News," Murdoch said. "We've had Congressman (Jerrold) Nadler as a guest quite often."

Nadler, D-N.Y., popped up with a quick "thank you," though the New York Democrat earlier had questioned Murdoch about tax shelters he allegedly uses to hide the company's true tax bill.

The executive brushed aside criticism that the deal will create a vertically integrated behemoth that could dominate the American media marketplace. Murdoch defended the purchase, saying it will bring in more local channels and more diverse programming and create additional competition to industry. He also reiterated the program-access protections he has agreed to undertake.

"Innovation and consumer choice are built into our DNA," he said, pointing out that when he started Fox there was only the Big Three, that Fox News has "dethroned" the dominant cable news channel and that his sports networks have brought renewed competition to a once "entrenched" industry.

Murdoch's defense won kudos from the GOP as Rep. Chris Cannon, R-Utah, said: "Thank you for what you've done. Thank you for your risk-taking."

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
As I said before. If you get the slant far enough one way. We have same here that we just faught against in Iraq. Dictatorship.
The good news there are only 28% card carring Rebuplicans in the USA. The silent majority are us Independents. As long as we don't let the wool get pulled over our eyes. We should be ok. What would be great is to have about 30 independent thinkers in Congress. And about 5 in the Senate. At least that way we could keep all the Rebuplicans and Democrats in line.
Somedays it looks like they all love each other to much. A good kick in the ass for a lot of them would be good.
Murdoch may get his way. Sad part of that is those who will lose there jobs. Typical in buy outs.
 
Last edited:

ryson

Capitalist
Forum Member
Dec 22, 2001
1,142
9
0
IAH
The liberal media has been spewing garbage for years and now you are upset because you may get both sides of the story. This is a tactic that Democrats, liberals, celebrities and professors have used for years. Thankfully it?s not working anymore. Because your anointed vision is being challenged and rejected, egocentric, collectivist zealots and their minions are now whining like spoiled brats. How unattractive adults can be when they have infantile emotional outbursts because they don?t get their way.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
Ryson you miss the point although your use of adjectives is pretty good. The point is not that Murdock is a Right Wing Zealot Fasist Pig of a person. The point is that the more we have consolidation the less voices will be heard and that is not a good thing in a democracy. It is not a good thing if the voice be from the left or the right. The point is that as this consolidation continues more and more opinions are being squashed.
 

ryson

Capitalist
Forum Member
Dec 22, 2001
1,142
9
0
IAH
If he were a Left Wing Fasist Pig of a person that would be OK :confused: In regards to your Democracy comment I love this quote from out 33rd President: "Democracy is based on the conviction that man has the moral and intellectual capacity.....to govern HIMSELF with reason and justice". Words to live by IMHO.
 
Last edited:

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
ryson, no that would not be good either. The point is we have too few voices controling the media. For example look what Clear Channel has done to music. They control so many stations we are only hearing what they want us to hear. Yes, we can still go to some alternative choices but those a shrinking as they cannot compete with the big money and power of Clear Channel.
Something else for you to think about. Murdock is not only a Right Wing Zealot Fascist Pig but he is an OLD etc. etc. So when he dies no saying what the political bent of his hiers will be.
 
Last edited:

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
More folks will get the drift of Fox and come to understand the news anchors have to follow guide lines. If not take a walk. If they can find enough of them that dont mind kissing some one ass everday. Good for them. But a real good one will want to try and look at both sides of a story. And the story can have two right angles or two left. No matter say what it is. I was rased so far right of center. That when I did escape it was a fresh breath of air. I still have a Brother that thinks I a sinner to the family because I dont believe all that right wing chit anymore. Then he cant understand why I dont buy all the left wing either.
Hell he admits he still goes in the voteing both, pulls the handle for the right no matter if they have complete dum chits runing in some of the races. He always says they come around. I tell him he just waisted half his vote. That's about when the shouting starts.
 
Last edited:

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
Actually it was not long ago that a person couldn't own the newspaper and a radio station or tv station in the same city because they could then be in position to sway public opinion. But in a move championed by no less than Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich that was all changed and we have the mess we have today.
Clinton and Gingrich agreeing on something that alone should tell you it was no good.
I apologize because I am drawing a blank in trying to come up with the name of the bill that these two dopes pushed thru.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,530
220
63
Bowling Green Ky
Hmmm I think it is the middle of the road common sense people that make Fox # 1 viewed news.
I do watch several but have to admit I really like O'Reilly.--and people can say what they want but common sense tells me that the informed tend to do the most book reading and VERY few people ever have a #1 selling book and to have 2 within 2 years is indisputable proof that a LOT of folks in this country cares what he has to say.
My reason for liking him is he will tackle issues (and yes on both sides but definately a slant right) that no one will touch and I might add that his issues lead to results,Sami Al Arian,911 charities ect.
A recent issue that is still pending is on law firm in Cal that
represented the child killer Westerfield. Appears that they knew he was guilty and tried to make deal for life sentence in exchange for showing them where body was,however they discovered body on their own before deal could be struck and attorneys tried to point to others in trial when they knew he was guilty. Fox requested the the Cal bar association look into it. They replied that they talked to judge and prosecuter and could find nothing,however the D.A. came on Fox and said no one had contacted him.:confused:
O'Reilly is not dropping the ball and bringing Attorney General into it.Appears he has the bars tit in a ringer,will be interesting to find out. When watching this the past 2 days I can not help but think of my ole bud Eddie and I finally understand why a president that lies under oath is no big deal to him.:p
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
dtb,

i agree with your assessment of o'reilly. i became a fan of his when he was hammering jeb bush & fla dept' of social services over the "misplacing" of the child in the foster care program.

incase you haven't seen his show, i would recommend that you take a look at the chris mathews show (hardball). although he leans more to the dem side, he too goes after both sides.he tries to keep his show moving at a fast pace, which i like.
 

Chanman

:-?PipeSmokin'
Forum Member
DTB- never thought about it til I read your post, but I feel the same way you do about O'Reilly. seems like I surf the channels half the times he is on, but I sometimes I watch the whole show. I'm glad someone is putting these items in the spotlight. An example is the Van Dam case. You'd think the parents had been through enough, even w/the sickening facts revealed, w/out having to see his name in the paper again.:mad:
AR182- Just read your post. Will spend more time watching Hardball. Thanx for the info.
 
Last edited:

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
DTB you bring up a good point. Book Reading. I would read at least one good book a week not to many years ago. Some times two if they were not to long. Now I sit and switch the clicker between CNN and Fox. Sometimes CNBC for financial info. When I think about it. What a waste of good time. Maybe its time for the books again. ;)
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,530
220
63
Bowling Green Ky
DJV You had great point in other post about the stock ticker,scores and news all on sreen at same time on the channel. I watch that 1st thing in early am when I wake up.
AR I watch Chris Mathews every night.Flip back and forth between there and fox. Get to office very early and read foreign publications on net and argue with the Muslims in Singapore forum.:D
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
DTB That's CNN Headline News that I watch. Fast quick and just the news. Weather, Sports and Stock Tickers. I like it because most all politics are removed. It's starting to seem like we have a election and before there even sworen in. They start running for the next term. Just seems to never end.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top