It's getting harder and harder to believe anyone is even watching these games. I'm nearly certain they just look at the box-scores and hit the 'blame the FT' button.
Of course, what these stat-watchers are failing to mention some other fairly important numbers.
Rebounds? Det 178...52 offensive.
LA...152...38 offensive.
Also a good one that none of the conspiricy theorist amongst us seem to be mentioning is the LA/Minni series.
Why?....Well in that series:
LA had 186 trips to the line.....Minni had 127.
In all but ONE game in the 6 game series, LA had 10 or more FT's. :shrug:
Guess the ref's were much more switched on in that series.
Oh...and I didn't see much of the Detroit/Indi series....So I look up the stats.
Detroit held Indi to 33.7%, 27.5%, 34.7%, 45.7%, 32.9% and 36.4% shooting.
It is therefore is totally evident to me that Detroit got EXTREMELY LUCKY in that series that Indi shot poorly.
Of course, what these stat-watchers are failing to mention some other fairly important numbers.
Rebounds? Det 178...52 offensive.
LA...152...38 offensive.
Also a good one that none of the conspiricy theorist amongst us seem to be mentioning is the LA/Minni series.
Why?....Well in that series:
LA had 186 trips to the line.....Minni had 127.
In all but ONE game in the 6 game series, LA had 10 or more FT's. :shrug:
Guess the ref's were much more switched on in that series.
Oh...and I didn't see much of the Detroit/Indi series....So I look up the stats.
Detroit held Indi to 33.7%, 27.5%, 34.7%, 45.7%, 32.9% and 36.4% shooting.
It is therefore is totally evident to me that Detroit got EXTREMELY LUCKY in that series that Indi shot poorly.
