NBA TUES 02162010 - Early Thoughts and Value Hunting

barts185

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 9, 2005
378
0
0
Hope that everyone had a good break.

Starting back up with PHO +1.5 over MEM. Simply, I think the wrong team is favored here.

Leans

DAL, if the new players are playing. Should know later today.

MIA

MIN
 

40seven

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
818
0
0
Va Beach
Early

Early

The Kings potential POD:00hour

The Kings win outright in my book so 6 1/2 points is a gift.

More later when we get the other lines until then:0corn
 

Philip_Rivers

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2009
22
0
0
San Diego
The Kings potential POD:00hour

The Kings win outright in my book so 6 1/2 points is a gift.

More later when we get the other lines until then:0corn

What's goin on Forty. I'm a Kings fan...ROY candidate Tyreke showed well during the Rookie-Sophmore Game. I was actually thinking of taking the Kings +6.5 as well...what makes you think that they will win outright? Do you know anything about how the Celts will do?
 

40seven

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
818
0
0
Va Beach
Found this info

Found this info

Here's a quick look at some of the GOOD, BAD, and UGLY team trends on every team and how they have fared SU (Straight Up) and ATS (Against The Spread) this season in games played through the All-Star break. In addition, I also break down performance records for each team in games versus .500 or less and greater than .500 opponents this campaign. Do your homework now, and enjoy the rest of the season?

ATLANTA

Good: 12-2 ATS vs. opp of .375 or less
Bad: 1-4 ATS as dog less than five points
Ugly: 0-3 ATS with no rest vs. division
Vs. .500 or less: 19-7 SU, 18-8 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 15-10 SU, 14-11 ATS

BOSTON

Good: 6-1-1 ATS pick or favorite of 4 or less points
Bad: 1-7 ATS favorites of 12 or more points
Ugly: 1-11 ATS home off loss
Vs. .500 or less: 23-6 SU, 10-19 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 9-12 SU, 9-11-1 ATS

CHICAGO

Good: 5-0-1 ATS vs. division opp off loss
Bad: 3-9 ATS away off SU and ATS loss
Ugly: 1-5 ATS off SU favorite loss
Vs. .500 or less: 13-12 SU, 10-13-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 12-14 SU, 14-12 ATS

CLEVELAND

Good: 8-0 SU and ATS vs. opp of .750 or greater
Bad: 1-4 ATS home with no rest
Ugly: 0-3 SU and ATS vs. opp with 3+ days rest
Vs. .500 or less: 20-6 SU, 10-16 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 21-4 SU, 16-7-2 ATS

DALLAS

Good: 7-1 ATS away off loss
Bad: 3-16 ATS home vs. non-division opp
Ugly: 0-4 ATS off BB SU and ATS losses
Vs. .500 or less: 18-8 SU, 9-17 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-12 SU, 12-14 ATS

DENVER

Good: 7-0-1 ATS home vs. opp off double-digit win
Bad: 1-6 ATS off SU dog win
Ugly: 0-4 ATS away vs. opp off SU dog win
Vs. .500 or less: 11-18 SU, 11-16-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 6-16 SU, 10-11-1 ATS

DETROIT

Good: 4-1-1 ATS vs. .250 or less opp
Bad: 4-14-2 ATS off ATS loss of 4 or more points
Ugly: 0-5-1 ATS fav off SU and ATS loss
Vs. .500 or less: 11-18 SU, 11-16-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 6-16 SU, 10-11-1 ATS

GOLDEN STATE

Good: 7-1 ATS dog vs. unrested opp
Bad: 2-6 SU and ATS fav of less than 6 points
Ugly: 1-5 ATS off loss vs. opp of SU dog win
Vs. .500 or less: 10-15, 12-12-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 4-22 SU, 16-10 ATS

HOUSTON

Good: 3-0 ATS vs. opp with 3 more days rest
Bad: 2-9 ATS fav with revenge
Ugly: 0-5 ATS vs. non div opp off SU dog win
Vs. .500 or less: 18-8, 13-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 9-16 SU, 11-14 ATS

INDIANA

Good: 5-0 ATS double-digit dog
Bad: 1-5 ATS off loss vs. div opp
Ugly: 1-7 ATS dog of 3 or less points
Vs. .500 or less: 14-16 SU, 13-17 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 4-18 SU, 9-13 ATS

LA CLIPPERS

Good: 5-1-1 ATS fav vs. Eastern Conference
Bad: 1-6 ATS dog vs. opp off double-digit win
Ugly: 0-7 ATS with rest vs. conf opp off BB SU and ATS losses
Vs. .500 or less: 14-15 SU, 13-15-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 7-16 SU, 11-12 ATS

LA LAKERS

Good: 6-1 ATS away vs. opp off double-digit loss
Bad: 2-7-1 ATS fav of 5 or less points
Ugly: 1-6 ATS vs. opp off BB SU and ATS wins
Vs. .500 or less: 23-3 SU, 14-12 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 18-10 SU, 11-15-2 ATS

MEMPHIS

Good: 12-1 ATS off win vs. opp of loss
Bad: 3-8 ATS away off loss
Ugly: 0-5 ATS off loss vs opp off SU and ATS win
Vs. .500 or less: 12-7 SU, 11-7-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-18 SU, 16-16 ATS

MIAMI

Good: 10-2 ATS vs. less .400 opp
Bad: 1-5 ATS vs. opp off SU dog win
Ugly: 0-3 SU and ATS off 3 wins
Vs. .500 or less: 16-10 SU, 14-12 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 10-17 SU, 12-14-1 ATS

MILWAUKEE

Good: 7-1 ATS no rest vs. unrested opp
Bad: 1-5 ATS off SU dog win vs. opp off win
Ugly: 0-3 ATS off 3-0 SU and ATS
Vs. .500 or less: 19-11 SU, 19-11 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 5-16 SU, 12-9 ATS

MINNESOTA

Good: 9-0 ATS dog of less 4 points
Bad: 4-11 ATS off BB losses vs opp off loss
Ugly: 0-5 ATS vs. unrested con opp
Vs. .500 or less: 8-20 SU, 15-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 5-20 SU, 13-12 ATS

NEW JERSEY

Good: 4-0 ATS double-digit div dog
Bad: 12-27-2 ATS vs. non div opp
Ugly: 0-3 SU and ATS fav
Vs. .500 or less: 4-21 SU, 8-16-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 0-27 SU, 11-15-1 ATS

NEW ORLEANS

Good: 10-2 ATS dog of more 7 points
Bad: 2-10 ATS fav off win
Ugly: 0-9 ATS vs. less .300 opp
Vs. .500 or less: 15-11 SU, 8-18 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 13-14 SU, 18-9 ATS

NEW YORK

Good: 8-1 ATS off loss of 14 more points
Bad: 1-5 ATS off double-digit win
Ugly: 1-6 ATS away with no rest
Vs. .500 or less: 14-18 SU, 14-17-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 5-14 SU, 9-10 ATS

OKLAHOMA CITY

Good: 14-1 ATS off SU and ATS loss
Bad: 2-6 ATS vs. unrested opp
Ugly: 1-6 ATS off double-digit ATS win vs. opp off BB wins
Vs. .500 or less: 16-7 SU, 13-10 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-14 SU, 19-9 ATS

ORLANDO

Good: 8-0 ATS vs. unrested opp off win
Bad: 1-5 ATS vs opp off BB SU and ATS losses
Ugly: 1-7 ATS home off SU and ATS win
Vs. .500 or less: 22-7 SU, 15-12-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-11 SU, 9-13-3 ATS

PHILADELPHIA

Good: 5-0 ATS dog of more 10 points
Bad: 7-18 ATS home
Ugly: 1-8 ATS home dog
Vs. .500 or less: 13-17 SU, 12-18 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 7-15 SU, 11-11 ATS

PHOENIX

Good: 4-0 ATS away vs. opp off BB SU and ATS losses
Bad: 2-7 ATS off win of 18 or more points
Ugly: 0-5-1 ATS with revenge vs. unrested opp
Vs. .500 or less: 17-9 SU, 13-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-13 SU, 14-12-1 ATS

PORTLAND

Good: 5-0 ATS no rest vs. opp of loss
Bad: 2-6-1 ATS off SU and ATS loss vs. opp off SU and ATS win
Ugly: 0-4 ATS off win vs. unrested opp
Vs. .500 or less: 18-9 SU, 14-12-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 13-15 SU, 15-12-1 ATS

SACRAMENTO

Good: 8-1 as double-digit dog
Bad: 3-9 ATS vs. Eastern Conference opp off win
Ugly: 0-5 ATS away vs. opp off SU favorite loss
Vs. .500 or less: 15-12 SU, 17-9-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 3-22 SU, 10-14-1 ATS

SAN ANTONIO

Good: 5-1 ATS off double-digit win vs. opp off BB wins
Bad: 2-5 ATS as dog of 2 more points
Ugly: 1-8 ATS off division
Vs. .500 or less: 20-8 SU, 15-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 10-13 SU, 10-13 ATS

TORONTO

Good: 8-2 ATS vs. unrested opp
Bad: 3-9 ATS with no rest
Ugly: 1-7 ATS away off loss vs. non div opp
Vs. .500 or less: 21-10 SU, 17-14 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 8-13 SU, 10-11 ATS

UTAH

Good: 9-0 SU and ATS home vs unrested opp
Bad: 2-5 ATS vs. div opp off loss
Ugly: 0-5 ATS fav of more than 7 points vs. div opp off loss
Vs. .500 or less: 17-7 SU, 14-10 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 15-12 SU, 17-8-2 ATS

WASHINGTON

Good: 4-1 ATS off win of less than 4 points
Bad: 1-6 ATS vs. opp of .750 greater
Ugly: 1-10 ATS fav more than 2 points
Vs. .500 or less: 11-18 SU, 11-15-3 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 6-15 SU, 7-14 ATS
__________________
 

40seven

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
818
0
0
Va Beach
No Just my opinion

No Just my opinion

What's goin on Forty. I'm a Kings fan...ROY candidate Tyreke showed well during the Rookie-Sophmore Game. I was actually thinking of taking the Kings +6.5 as well...what makes you think that they will win outright? Do you know anything about how the Celts will do?


Home Dogs are doing well covering and with everything going on in Boston, I may take a shot
 

Joe_Vienna

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
517
0
0
Vienna, Austria
twitter.com
Here's a quick look at some of the GOOD, BAD, and UGLY team trends on every team and how they have fared SU (Straight Up) and ATS (Against The Spread) this season in games played through the All-Star break. In addition, I also break down performance records for each team in games versus .500 or less and greater than .500 opponents this campaign. Do your homework now, and enjoy the rest of the season?

ATLANTA

Good: 12-2 ATS vs. opp of .375 or less
Bad: 1-4 ATS as dog less than five points
Ugly: 0-3 ATS with no rest vs. division
Vs. .500 or less: 19-7 SU, 18-8 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 15-10 SU, 14-11 ATS

BOSTON

Good: 6-1-1 ATS pick or favorite of 4 or less points
Bad: 1-7 ATS favorites of 12 or more points
Ugly: 1-11 ATS home off loss
Vs. .500 or less: 23-6 SU, 10-19 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 9-12 SU, 9-11-1 ATS

CHICAGO

Good: 5-0-1 ATS vs. division opp off loss
Bad: 3-9 ATS away off SU and ATS loss
Ugly: 1-5 ATS off SU favorite loss
Vs. .500 or less: 13-12 SU, 10-13-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 12-14 SU, 14-12 ATS

CLEVELAND

Good: 8-0 SU and ATS vs. opp of .750 or greater
Bad: 1-4 ATS home with no rest
Ugly: 0-3 SU and ATS vs. opp with 3+ days rest
Vs. .500 or less: 20-6 SU, 10-16 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 21-4 SU, 16-7-2 ATS

DALLAS

Good: 7-1 ATS away off loss
Bad: 3-16 ATS home vs. non-division opp
Ugly: 0-4 ATS off BB SU and ATS losses
Vs. .500 or less: 18-8 SU, 9-17 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-12 SU, 12-14 ATS

DENVER

Good: 7-0-1 ATS home vs. opp off double-digit win
Bad: 1-6 ATS off SU dog win
Ugly: 0-4 ATS away vs. opp off SU dog win
Vs. .500 or less: 11-18 SU, 11-16-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 6-16 SU, 10-11-1 ATS

DETROIT

Good: 4-1-1 ATS vs. .250 or less opp
Bad: 4-14-2 ATS off ATS loss of 4 or more points
Ugly: 0-5-1 ATS fav off SU and ATS loss
Vs. .500 or less: 11-18 SU, 11-16-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 6-16 SU, 10-11-1 ATS

GOLDEN STATE

Good: 7-1 ATS dog vs. unrested opp
Bad: 2-6 SU and ATS fav of less than 6 points
Ugly: 1-5 ATS off loss vs. opp of SU dog win
Vs. .500 or less: 10-15, 12-12-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 4-22 SU, 16-10 ATS

HOUSTON

Good: 3-0 ATS vs. opp with 3 more days rest
Bad: 2-9 ATS fav with revenge
Ugly: 0-5 ATS vs. non div opp off SU dog win
Vs. .500 or less: 18-8, 13-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 9-16 SU, 11-14 ATS

INDIANA

Good: 5-0 ATS double-digit dog
Bad: 1-5 ATS off loss vs. div opp
Ugly: 1-7 ATS dog of 3 or less points
Vs. .500 or less: 14-16 SU, 13-17 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 4-18 SU, 9-13 ATS

LA CLIPPERS

Good: 5-1-1 ATS fav vs. Eastern Conference
Bad: 1-6 ATS dog vs. opp off double-digit win
Ugly: 0-7 ATS with rest vs. conf opp off BB SU and ATS losses
Vs. .500 or less: 14-15 SU, 13-15-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 7-16 SU, 11-12 ATS

LA LAKERS

Good: 6-1 ATS away vs. opp off double-digit loss
Bad: 2-7-1 ATS fav of 5 or less points
Ugly: 1-6 ATS vs. opp off BB SU and ATS wins
Vs. .500 or less: 23-3 SU, 14-12 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 18-10 SU, 11-15-2 ATS

MEMPHIS

Good: 12-1 ATS off win vs. opp of loss
Bad: 3-8 ATS away off loss
Ugly: 0-5 ATS off loss vs opp off SU and ATS win
Vs. .500 or less: 12-7 SU, 11-7-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-18 SU, 16-16 ATS

MIAMI

Good: 10-2 ATS vs. less .400 opp
Bad: 1-5 ATS vs. opp off SU dog win
Ugly: 0-3 SU and ATS off 3 wins
Vs. .500 or less: 16-10 SU, 14-12 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 10-17 SU, 12-14-1 ATS

MILWAUKEE

Good: 7-1 ATS no rest vs. unrested opp
Bad: 1-5 ATS off SU dog win vs. opp off win
Ugly: 0-3 ATS off 3-0 SU and ATS
Vs. .500 or less: 19-11 SU, 19-11 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 5-16 SU, 12-9 ATS

MINNESOTA

Good: 9-0 ATS dog of less 4 points
Bad: 4-11 ATS off BB losses vs opp off loss
Ugly: 0-5 ATS vs. unrested con opp
Vs. .500 or less: 8-20 SU, 15-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 5-20 SU, 13-12 ATS

NEW JERSEY

Good: 4-0 ATS double-digit div dog
Bad: 12-27-2 ATS vs. non div opp
Ugly: 0-3 SU and ATS fav
Vs. .500 or less: 4-21 SU, 8-16-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 0-27 SU, 11-15-1 ATS

NEW ORLEANS

Good: 10-2 ATS dog of more 7 points
Bad: 2-10 ATS fav off win
Ugly: 0-9 ATS vs. less .300 opp
Vs. .500 or less: 15-11 SU, 8-18 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 13-14 SU, 18-9 ATS

NEW YORK

Good: 8-1 ATS off loss of 14 more points
Bad: 1-5 ATS off double-digit win
Ugly: 1-6 ATS away with no rest
Vs. .500 or less: 14-18 SU, 14-17-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 5-14 SU, 9-10 ATS

OKLAHOMA CITY

Good: 14-1 ATS off SU and ATS loss
Bad: 2-6 ATS vs. unrested opp
Ugly: 1-6 ATS off double-digit ATS win vs. opp off BB wins
Vs. .500 or less: 16-7 SU, 13-10 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-14 SU, 19-9 ATS

ORLANDO

Good: 8-0 ATS vs. unrested opp off win
Bad: 1-5 ATS vs opp off BB SU and ATS losses
Ugly: 1-7 ATS home off SU and ATS win
Vs. .500 or less: 22-7 SU, 15-12-2 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-11 SU, 9-13-3 ATS

PHILADELPHIA

Good: 5-0 ATS dog of more 10 points
Bad: 7-18 ATS home
Ugly: 1-8 ATS home dog
Vs. .500 or less: 13-17 SU, 12-18 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 7-15 SU, 11-11 ATS

PHOENIX

Good: 4-0 ATS away vs. opp off BB SU and ATS losses
Bad: 2-7 ATS off win of 18 or more points
Ugly: 0-5-1 ATS with revenge vs. unrested opp
Vs. .500 or less: 17-9 SU, 13-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 14-13 SU, 14-12-1 ATS

PORTLAND

Good: 5-0 ATS no rest vs. opp of loss
Bad: 2-6-1 ATS off SU and ATS loss vs. opp off SU and ATS win
Ugly: 0-4 ATS off win vs. unrested opp
Vs. .500 or less: 18-9 SU, 14-12-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 13-15 SU, 15-12-1 ATS

SACRAMENTO

Good: 8-1 as double-digit dog
Bad: 3-9 ATS vs. Eastern Conference opp off win
Ugly: 0-5 ATS away vs. opp off SU favorite loss
Vs. .500 or less: 15-12 SU, 17-9-1 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 3-22 SU, 10-14-1 ATS

SAN ANTONIO

Good: 5-1 ATS off double-digit win vs. opp off BB wins
Bad: 2-5 ATS as dog of 2 more points
Ugly: 1-8 ATS off division
Vs. .500 or less: 20-8 SU, 15-13 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 10-13 SU, 10-13 ATS

TORONTO

Good: 8-2 ATS vs. unrested opp
Bad: 3-9 ATS with no rest
Ugly: 1-7 ATS away off loss vs. non div opp
Vs. .500 or less: 21-10 SU, 17-14 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 8-13 SU, 10-11 ATS

UTAH

Good: 9-0 SU and ATS home vs unrested opp
Bad: 2-5 ATS vs. div opp off loss
Ugly: 0-5 ATS fav of more than 7 points vs. div opp off loss
Vs. .500 or less: 17-7 SU, 14-10 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 15-12 SU, 17-8-2 ATS

WASHINGTON

Good: 4-1 ATS off win of less than 4 points
Bad: 1-6 ATS vs. opp of .750 greater
Ugly: 1-10 ATS fav more than 2 points
Vs. .500 or less: 11-18 SU, 11-15-3 ATS
Vs. winning opp: 6-15 SU, 7-14 ATS
__________________
Nice!!!! Thanks for sharing this info:toast:
 

grindstone

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
1,150
4
0
Here is what I got so far nothing locked yet but looking at

Sac + 6

Phx/Mem U221.5

Mia + 2

Let's keep up the great work boys and hoping for a strong second half

GLTA
 

Slicer

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
498
0
0
North Carolina
Straight Up Trends (Won Loss)Category Record Percent

Away Teams 307-472 39.41%
Home Teams 472-307 60.59%
Favorites 534-245 68.55%
Dogs 245-534 31.45%
Away Favorites 141-79 64.09%
Away Dogs 166-393 29.70%
Home Favorites 393-166 70.30%
Home Dogs 79-141 35.91%

Against The Spread Trends (ATS)Category Record Percent

Away Teams 393-373-13 51.31%
Home Teams 373-393-13 48.69%
Favorites 372-394-13 48.56%
Dogs 394-372-13 51.44%
Away Favorites 109-110-1 49.77%
Away Dogs 284-263-12 51.92%
Home Favorites 263-284-12 48.08%
Home Dogs 110-109-1 50.23%

Over vs. Under TrendsCategory Overs Percent Unders Percent

Overtime Games 42 95.45% 2 4.55%
Non-Overtime Games 329 45.63% 392 54.37%
All Games 371 48.50% 394 51.50%
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
I think the thanks go to Illuminati, unless he was copying it from somewhere else.

As far as I know, the info comes up on 3 sites,
407 could have found it from one of those and my original post got overlooked over the weekend?

Mo big deal, as long as it as looked at today !

Rock on ! \m/
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Mavericks at Thunder

Mavericks at Thunder

Mavericks at Thunder
Dallas Mavericks at Oklahoma City Thunder (-3.5, 195)

Maverick makeover

Despite leading the Southwest Division, and being just one of only seven teams to own a winning record in head-to-head games against other winning teams this season, the Mavericks pulled the trigger on a huge seven-player swap during the break.

Dallas dealt forwards Josh Howard and Drew Gooden to Washington for forward Caron Butler, center Brendan Haywood and guard DeShawn Stevenson. The Mavericks also sent Quinton Ross and James Singleton to the Wizards to conclude the trade.

The trade improves the Mavs on paper but it?s unclear how quickly the new arrivals will gel.

?It?s going to be tough to get everyone together that quick,? Dirk Nowitzki told the Dallas Morning News. ??Hopefully we?re going to put some basics in Monday, just a couple of plays, tell them our defensive philosophy and go out and play.?

After dropping five of their seven games before the All-Star break, Mavs All-Star guard Jason Kidd said, "We haven't been playing well, that's for sure. Sometimes people might think that moving someone or making a trade can help. We have a big week coming out of the All-Star break ... 30 games left, it's a sprint now, not a marathon. I think we're going to be ready for that."

Mavericks owner Mark Cuban chimed in, "[The trade] makes us significantly better. Different teams go through different situations. The Mavs went through it in the '90s, the Wizards are going through some issues right now. Sometimes giving guys a fresh home I think re-energizes them, and will work the other way, too."

Thunderous ovation

After winning 23 games all of last season, Oklahoma City resides in third place in the Northwest Division at the break with a 30-21 record. The Thunder take a six-game win streak into tonight?s contest, the franchise's first six-game winning streak since the team moved from Seattle.

All-Star forward Kevin Durant is second in the league in scoring at 29.7 ppg, just behind LeBron James (29.9 ppg) and ahead of Carmelo Anthony (29.2 ppg).

KD has scored 25 or more points in 25 straight games and the Thunder are 17-8 against the spread over that streak.

By the numbers

Here is how each team ranks in four major team categories among other teams in the league, according to ******* statistical rankings:

Offensive Scoring:
Dallas (12) 101.3
Oklahoma City (19) 98.5

Defensive Scoring:
Dallas (15) 99.6
Oklahoma City (5) 95.4

Rebound Margin:
Dallas (23) ?0.69
Oklahoma City (4) +2.41

Against The Spread:
Dallas (28) 21-31
Oklahoma City (1) 32-19

Coaches? corner

No coach on a win streak welcomes the rust that comes after the All-Star break and OKC bench boss Scott Brooks is no different.

"This is a lot of time off. The concern is guys taking six days off and laying on the couch," Brooks said.

Meanwhile, Dallas head coach Rick Carlisle realizes the importance of getting off on a good foot following the break and the aforementioned trade.

Chemistry and a new attitude are major concerns. "It's an important start," Carlisle said. "It's been a tough 10-day stretch? We need to get healthy coming out of the break.?

The Mavs were routed, 127-91, at Denver in their final game before the break last Tuesday and sport a 10-11 record since December 31.

Bet you didn?t you know

The Mavericks are 1-4 SU and 0-5 ATS when playing with six or more days of rest. Dallas is also 16-3 SU and 14-5 ATS in games off a loss of more than 20 points, including 10-1 SU and ATS versus an opponent off a win.

Oklahoma City is 6-1 ATS the last seven games in this series and 32-15-1 ATS versus Southwest Division opponents since moving to Oklahoma City. The Thunder are 2-2 SU and ATS when playing with six or more days of rest.
 

BillyBatts

IlliniBill
Forum Member
Mar 31, 2009
788
0
0
Illinois
Leans

Leans

Looks like we have a nice discussion with some great info going already. Thanks:00hour

My 2 cents:director:

As for the Mavs and Thunder, everyone knows my affection for the Thunder, and I stated I thought they are getting better every game, and would be a hot 2nd half team. I think the Mavs may take a little time to gel with all the new pieces, so I lean OKC there. Shocker I know.
Another thing to look for---
With all the teams coming off of a long break, I lean towards all the unders. Fresh legs usually equals better effort on defense, and maybe a little rusty with thier shot and timing on offense.

Some other leans.
Nets +11 :scared
Griz -1
Kings +6


Let's find us some winners :toast:
 

40seven

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
818
0
0
Va Beach
Yea I got it from

Yea I got it from

As far as I know, the info comes up on 3 sites,
407 could have found it from one of those and my original post got overlooked over the weekend?

Mo big deal, as long as it as looked at today !

Rock on ! \m/

Dep****spot*.com, I do not usually read alot of posts here or over there cus of the bashing, I so easily lose focus.
 

40seven

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
818
0
0
Va Beach
Three plays for tonight

Three plays for tonight

As stated last night The Kings +6 and a small play ML

The Heat +2, D Wade made his statement that he is playing.

The Stones -5, 5 is alot of points to give the Twolves but at home and rested will help the Stones and the rest and road will hurt the Wolves. I expect the Wolves to come out slow and sluggish.

I lean Under in Portland, but if this trade occurs NO PLAY
 

pfj

Registered User
Forum Member
May 9, 2009
5,611
7
0
As stated last night The Kings +6 and a small play ML

The Heat +2, D Wade made his statement that he is playing.

The Stones -5, 5 is alot of points to give the Twolves but at home and rested will help the Stones and the rest and road will hurt the Wolves. I expect the Wolves to come out slow and sluggish.

I lean Under in Portland, but if this trade occurs NO PLAY

The thing that scares me about the heat +2 is the amount of public on the heat with no line movement.
503 MIAMI HEAT spread 84% ML 99%
504 PHIL 76ERS spread 16% ML 1% :scared
 

BillyBatts

IlliniBill
Forum Member
Mar 31, 2009
788
0
0
Illinois
No play on Kings

No play on Kings

Just some info for those considering backing the Kings tonight, I see it's a popular play here.

Kings are 2-10-1 last 13 at home, and 2-9-1 last 12 as home dog ATS
Boston has handled Sacramento the last two seasons, going 4-0 SU and 3-1 ATS, with every victory coming by at least 12 points. The Celtics hare 4-2 ATS the previous six as road 'chalk. :scared

I think under 199.5 here has some value. :0corn
Under is 5-1 in Celtics last 6 games as a road favorite of 5.0-10.5.
Under is 7-1 in Kings last 8 vs. a team with a winning S.U. record
Under is 4-1 in Kings last 5 games playing on 3 or more days rest.
Under is 5-2 in the last 7 meetings
 
Last edited:

BillyBatts

IlliniBill
Forum Member
Mar 31, 2009
788
0
0
Illinois
Updated leans

Updated leans

Nets +11 and under 187.5
TWolves +5.5 (possible POD)
Thunder -4.5
Celts under 199.5
Warriors +14.5 and over 217.5

Be back in a bit with a play or two. kurby
 

grindstone

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
1,150
4
0
Locked and loaded boys :padlock:

Phx/Mem U221

Sac + 6

NYK +7

Mia + 2


GLTA
 

BillyBatts

IlliniBill
Forum Member
Mar 31, 2009
788
0
0
Illinois
Question

Question

Locked and loaded boys :padlock:

Phx/Mem U221

Sac + 6

NYK +7

Mia + 2


GLTA



Good luck tonight GS .
One question on your Suns under play. The last 4 between these 2 teams have flown over the total, including 3 this year, with totals of 220, 228, and 225 last game. I know Memphis has had trouble scoring of late, and I see the Books may have adjusted to that with a number 5 points lower than the last game. Could you explain why you took the under? Thanks in advance and good luck as always :mj06:
 

grindstone

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
1,150
4
0
Good luck tonight GS .
One question on your Suns under play. The last 4 between these 2 teams have flown over the total, including 3 this year, with totals of 220, 228, and 225 last game. I know Memphis has had trouble scoring of late, and I see the Books may have adjusted to that with a number 5 points lower than the last game. Could you explain why you took the under? Thanks in advance and good luck as always :mj06:

I have this game capped at 213. I'm hoping for a slow paced game and some bad shooting on behalf of both teams come post allstar break. Also 70% of the public is on the over
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top