NEW DOGS - Tue Edition

[Randercity]

YTD: 124-151 45.1% +32.85 Units

Here's today's card...

PITT +160
PHIL +160
S.F. +140
COLO +220
L.A. +120
CWS +160
DET +130
BALT +120
K.C. +140

There you go... 9 plays for tonite!

 

[Randercity]

Here's the money breakdown for tonite. It's based on a $100 play for each team in it's situation tonite, ie, MONT on the road vs RH starter, etc... Games where money difference is $1000 or greater or in BOLD TYPE.

Mont + 605
FLOR +1530 DIFF 875

Pitt - 225
METS - 40 DIFF 185

Phil - 395
ATL + 125 DIFF 520

Cinc + 655 DIFF 275
CUBS + 380

STL + 155 DIFF 1075
MILW - 920

S.F. + 200 DIFF 70
HOUS + 130

Colo - 665
ARIZ + 145 DIFF 810

L.A. - 460 DIFF 385
S.D. - 845

CWS - 660
NYY +1035 DIFF 1695

Minn - 245 DIFF 415
DET - 660

TOR +1340 DIFF 2165
BALT - 825

Bost - 145 DIFF 75
TBAY - 220

Clev + 785 DIFF 1155
K.C. - 370

Sea + 360 DIFF 825
ANA - 465

Texs - 440
OAK + 390 DIFF 830

Based on a $1000 DIFF, there are four plays. STL, NYY, CLEV, and TOR. Of these, 3 conflict with the DOG system, leaving only STL.

[This message has been edited by Randercity (edited 10-02-2001).]

 

[gsp]

WLA shows CWS and Balt. My regular cappin shows Phil, Hou, Stl and Fla. Be interesting to see the +1000

 

[gsp]

Sure don't help me make up my mind. Is it possible for you to do Tor/Balt the last three weeks. With Welke behind the plate the home team is 8-2, home dogs for the year 5-0, Tor 1-6 and Balt at home is 4-2. Balt, playing better the last couple of weeks, is the reason I'm interested in the last three weeks.

 

[Randercity]

Sorry GSP... I don't have that info. I get the MONEY BREAKDOWN from the RESOURCES section (NSS or JIM FIEST's) I will tell you that TOR is probably around even or minus the past three weeks though, because they have been over 1000+ on the road vs RH for a long long time. BALT is probably plus due to taking two of three at home vs NYY, and I recall them being -1000 awhile back, and they've clawed their way above that mark. TOR had a very hot start on the road, while they were losing consistently at home. It's evened out quite a bit for them the past few months. Hope that helps...

 

[gsp]

Thanks Randercity. I'm going to take a shot at it.

 

[Patience]

6-3 on DOGS, GJ! Keep them coming

 

[Randercity]

Thanks Patience...

6-3 +5.40 Units

Gotta love it!
YTD: 130-154 45.8% +38.25 Units

This system has now been in place for about two months and is hitting nearly 46% on all dogs! Based on a mere $100 per play, this system would have generated a nice $3825 profit. Because there have been 284 plays, your total risk would be $28,400, which computes to a 13.47% return on investment. Since this is for two months only, one would need to multiply that figure by six to generate a return for the year, which would be 80.80% annualized return on investment!

WHO NEEDS WALL STREET??

What's even scarier to think, is that one did not need $28,400 to start this, but merely around $2000. Granted, you would have needed additional funds available had you started out losing, but this system made money on the 2nd day, so only two days action was technically needed. I know there are a BUNCH of cappers out there who wish they had jumped on this early on, but most have not. I must admit, it's difficult as most of the plays contradict normal capping philosophies, and place you on games that seemingly have NO CHANCE to win, but still do. I do know one thing, I will be back with this system next year, and hopefully it has the same type of performance.

 

[gsp]

Unless I can't count, your money-line plays went 11-4 last night and kept me off CWS. Thanks for the work.

 

[AM2kidz]

Hey Randercity.... Incredible job yesterday... It was a Dog Day Afternoon

Keep up the good work.... Looking forward to todays plays... U DA MAN.... AM2kidz

 

[skulldog]

Randercity your like the pied piper(spelling) and I'm following.

Thanks again for all your efforts.

Is it possible to use your system against previous year box scores?

 

[BullpinBill]

Not sure i understand "3 conflict with dog system leaving only St.Louis". If memory serves me St.Louis was a fav of at least -160 last night not a dog.
While i'm here let me ask a moneyline question. At a site i visited Tampa Bay had 41 games vs -200 or more teams this year and was -$1365.00. Does this mean the opposite is true? If i had bet ON the -200+ team each of those 41 times would i have won and be ahead +$1365.00?

 

[Palmetto Pimp]

he meant the rest conflicted with the dog plays except st louis....
and if you played the fav vs TB all those times you would not be up that much because you have to remeber you would be using a dime line or 20 cent line