New Reports: There Is No Global Warming

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,761
1,036
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
New Reports: There Is No Global Warming




Friday, 31 Oct 2014 01:23 PM


The liberal media machine has spent decades bulldozing anyone who tells you global warming is a sham.

They even came up with a clever little title ? ?deniers.?

Every time a heat wave hits, every time a picture of a lone polar bear gets taken . . . the left pounds the table for environmental reform, more policy, more money to combat climate change. But how much has the world really warmed?

Their message is simple: Get on the man-made global warming bandwagon . . . or you?re just ignorant.

But how much has the world really warmed?

It?s an important question, considering the U.S. government spends $22 billion a year to fight the global warming crisis (twice as much as it spends protecting our border).

To put that in perspective, that is $41,856 every minute going to global warming initiatives.


But that's just the tip of a gargantuan iceberg.

According to Forbes columnist Larry Bell, the ripple effect of global warming initiatives actually costs Americans $1.75 trillion . . . every year.

That's three times larger than the entire U.S. federal budget deficit.

So, has anyone stopped to ask . . . how much has the globe actually warmed?

Well, we asked, and what we found was striking.

According to NASA?s own data via Remote Sensing Systems(RSS), the world has warmed a mere .36 degrees Fahrenheit over the last 35 years (they started measuring the data in 1979).

Hardly anything to panic about; however, that does mean the world is warmer, right?

The problem with that argument is that we experienced the bulk of that warming between 1979 and 1998 . . . since then, we?ve actually had temperatures DROPPING!

As can be seen in this chart, we haven?t seen any global warming for 17 years.

Weakening the global warming argument is data showing that the North Polar ice cap is increasing in size. Recent satellite images from NASA actually reflect an increase of 43% to 63%.

This is quite the opposite of what the global warming faction warned us.

In 2007, while accepting his Nobel Prize for his global warming initiative, Al Gore made this striking prediction, ?The North Polar ice cap is falling off a cliff. It could be completely gone in summer in as little as seven years. Seven years from now.?

Al Gore could not have been more wrong.

However, despite this clear evidence that the temperatures are not increasing, the global warming hysteria only seems to be increasing.

For example: President Obama himself tweeted on May 16, 2014: ?97% of scientists agree: climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.? John Kerry, Al Gore, and a host of others have championed this statistic.

Since then, it has become clear that this statistic was inaccurate.

The Wall Street Journal went as far as to say, ?The assertion that 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a man-made, urgent problem is a fiction.? Forbes headlined ?Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring ?97% Consensus? Claims.?

Come to find out, the study President Obama was citing was botched from the start.

A host of other problems for the global warming crowd are emerging, such as . . .

?Leaked emails from global warming scientists state that the Earth is not warming, such as this one from Kevin Trenberth that states, ?The fact is that we can?t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty we can?t.?
?Claude Allegre, the founding father of the man-made global warming ethos, recently renounced his position that man has caused warming.
?Proof is emerging that Al Gore and even President Obama have financially benefited from fueling the global warming hysteria (click here for an internal report on this).

It is becoming harder and harder for the global warming community to ignore some of the scientific data that show the Earth is not getting warmer . . . instead, the world is getting cooler.

Which makes one wonder ? why are we still spending $22 billion a year on global warming initiatives, and where is the money going? (Click Here to Read a Controversial Report on This Topic.)

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/MKTNews/global-warming-hoax-facts/2014/10/17/id/601458/#ixzz3Hq5BjOKU
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,729
1,646
113
51
Earth
www.ffrf.org
What's in it for you to deny what 97% of scientists report? The corporate shills are being paid, but you dolts aren't getting a penny. I don't get it, but it is kind of funny to see grown men get played.
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,761
1,036
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
What's in it for you to deny what 97% of scientists report? The corporate shills are being paid, but you dolts aren't getting a penny. I don't get it, but it is kind of funny to see grown men get played.

Nut, why do you CONDONE ALGORE making millions on this? He flies in and OUT in a PRIVATE JET that causes CLIMATE CHANGE.

:0corn
 

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
What is in it for you?

Is that the mantra these days? What is in it for you?

How about what is in it for society?


How about higher costs on energy across the board for EVERYONE because we can no longer use coal?

So, the people pushing the green agenda get rich and richer because of all the enviro-babble on the backs of the middle class and poor people paying more to heat their homes?


I'm all for personal responsibility - good husbandry of the planet. I recycle. I cut my own wood. I conserve and take as good care of mother Earth as I can. But the high religion of Environmentalism is a crony-capiitalistic venture....follow the money and look who is getting rich off the deal.

If they really cared about the planet, why do they enforce stringent pollution standards on countries in the EU and the US but do not enforce them on China? Who do you think is the biggest industrial polluter in the WORLD?
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,761
1,036
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
CBS News lead with the UN climate change story last night, how many of those UN people are going to BANK on keeping the SCAM going, HANG the LYING FUCKERS!!!
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,729
1,646
113
51
Earth
www.ffrf.org
What is in it for you?

Is that the mantra these days? What is in it for you?

How about what is in it for society?


How about higher costs on energy across the board for EVERYONE because we can no longer use coal?

So, the people pushing the green agenda get rich and richer because of all the enviro-babble on the backs of the middle class and poor people paying more to heat their homes?


I'm all for personal responsibility - good husbandry of the planet. I recycle. I cut my own wood. I conserve and take as good care of mother Earth as I can. But the high religion of Environmentalism is a crony-capiitalistic venture....follow the money and look who is getting rich off the deal.

If they really cared about the planet, why do they enforce stringent pollution standards on countries in the EU and the US but do not enforce them on China? Who do you think is the biggest industrial polluter in the WORLD?

That's just it, there's nothing in it for me. I see that the OVERWHELMING majority of scientists agree that the earth is warming and I say, probably something to it. I look at those that publicly deny it (corporations and politicians) and notice that they have a financial stake in avoiding regulation, so I get it. But, the suckers like you and Skulnik, I just can't figure out. What's in it for you to side with the 3%? You're not bought and paid for, so are you just stupid? I'm guessing you must be, because there is no other explanation....and I am not saying that to be insulting.

I'm glad you recycle, but that's got nothing to do with this. Neither does the "religion of Environmentalism". It was a simple question: What's in it for you to deny the existence of global warming?
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top