News Corp
- Thread starter kcwolf
- Start date
Uh-oh, it's in the USA now at the WSJ. Maybe they'll shut down too.
http://news.yahoo.com/dow-jones-ceo-murdoch-lieutenant-hinton-quits-202707373.html
Buh-bye Rupie.
http://news.yahoo.com/dow-jones-ceo-murdoch-lieutenant-hinton-quits-202707373.html
Buh-bye Rupie.
<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/a3xsDv6yCnY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
For years i have been saying this fuker is a cancer to the working people in this country. I have to ask DTB now does he still think this group is credible? I mean over and over clips have been posted about out and out lies from these despicable people. Now this. DTB is this enuf evidence or do u still need more? I always laugh when people put MSNBC in the same sentence with these shisters. DTB is this enuf or will u still be stuck on stupid?
From Salon.com:
Rupert Murdoch's international house of bad journalism
By Alex Pareene
News of the World is a British Sunday tabloid newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch since 1969. It, along with the daily Sun, is where Murdoch perfected the salacious tabloid format he'd eventually import to America, where it found much more success as a television station. The basic formula hasn't changed: rabid right-wing politics, sexy girls, constant bellowing outrage, celebrity scandal and a general disregard for journalistic ethics. That News Corp culture -- prizing scoops above all else, from basic human decency to, sometimes, truth itself -- is what has led to the "phone hacking" scandal that now consumes the U.K. The News of the World, it turns out, had a long-standing practice of breaking into the voicemails of newsworthy figures, from celebrities to the victims of horrific crimes.
http://www.salon.com/news/rupert_mu.../politics/war_room/2011/07/06/murdoch_scandal
Rupert Murdoch's international house of bad journalism
By Alex Pareene
News of the World is a British Sunday tabloid newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch since 1969. It, along with the daily Sun, is where Murdoch perfected the salacious tabloid format he'd eventually import to America, where it found much more success as a television station. The basic formula hasn't changed: rabid right-wing politics, sexy girls, constant bellowing outrage, celebrity scandal and a general disregard for journalistic ethics. That News Corp culture -- prizing scoops above all else, from basic human decency to, sometimes, truth itself -- is what has led to the "phone hacking" scandal that now consumes the U.K. The News of the World, it turns out, had a long-standing practice of breaking into the voicemails of newsworthy figures, from celebrities to the victims of horrific crimes.
http://www.salon.com/news/rupert_mu.../politics/war_room/2011/07/06/murdoch_scandal
wouldn't it be nice to have a conservative station out there with ideas who actually wanted to move the country forward and really did present another side instead of these hacks who have only one agenda and this agenda has nothing to do with 99 percent of America? You might get some interesting debate and some ideas that would help this country. These despicable fuks have the same tired old ideas that have been proven over and over again that they don't work unless u are in the top one percent. Why was it so bad when Clinton was in office that everyone made money even the top one percent?
Wouldn't it be nice if all NEWS OUTLETS stuck to REPORTING the NEWS instead of CHOOSING sides?
PITY REALLY.
For what u dumb shit? You don't know the fukin truth if it bit ya in the ass. U might be the most gullible person on this site. U side with the one station that gets caught in so many lies most would say it would be insane to even admit u side with them. :facepalm: Let me try to reason with u. This shit hole rat infested station is now being accused of tapping peoples phones to get news. Why in the world would you support this?
Look Sponge, you're the STUPID ASS if you don't RECOGNIZE the LIBERAL BIAS by most NEWS ORGANIZATIONS.
Have a GLASS of KOOL-AID.
TIA
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
The only reason you think there is a liberal bias in the news is because Rupert Murdoch's agencies told you so.
Maybe for him this is the case, but I know I was exposed to this type of thought by Rush in the 90s. Even when I broke free of the bonds of conservative talk radio, I remained an avid republican until sometime during W's second term when I finally opted to begin thinking for myself, so to speak. I had been a republican all of my life. As a teen, I was taught by my dad -- who in my mind is as sharp an individual as I've run across--, that I should support the GOP in the best interest of our income producing assets here and in Europe.
That back story aside, I still feel the networks are tougher on the right than they are on the left. W got killed for gas prices, while I don't hear any mud slung at O for the same thing. It just so happens that fox is the most biased network by a country mile, and now even the most staunch supporter must admit that this network lacks the integrity to be taken seriously.
Last edited:
Liberal bias? Where? Look who owns the news stations?
Those Liberal bias news stations made the deserter Bush out to be the war hero over Kerry. They had Kerry defending his service record. Amazing. While the drunkard was somehow a hero.
Those Liberal bias news stations made the deserter Bush out to be the war hero over Kerry. They had Kerry defending his service record. Amazing. While the drunkard was somehow a hero.
Look who owns the news stations?
Somehow this has become the Liberal answer to combat the argument of LIBERAL BIAS, good job
Saul Alinsky, you have them PREACHING your GOSPEL.
JMHO
:facepalm:
Somehow this has become the Liberal answer to combat the argument of LIBERAL BIAS, good job
Saul Alinsky, you have them PREACHING your GOSPEL.
JMHO
:facepalm:
