nfl plays for 12/10-12/11....

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
nflx............................8-8.........+5.80*
nfl regular season.......45-30.......+39.70*

hopefully i will be able to rebound from little slump that i have been in.....


dallas-6(130)......

this is my best bet this week....but so was denver last week & minn. the week before..so i would recommend caution if anybody follows this play.

when i first saw this line i liked dallas, but i then started reading that dallas usually doesn't play well in games after they play the giants. so then i got off this play.then i started thinking about the matchups,reading injury reports & about a player on n.o. who will be suspended for the game...& finally because game will be played on prime time, i hopped back on the dallas bandwagon.i think parcells will have his team ready to play for a sunday night game.

the saints are one of the most improved teams in the nfl this year....they are 8-4 on the season. but they have played only 2 teams with a winning record this whole year. they lost to both of those teams (balt. & cin.) at home by an average margin of 14 points.

in looking at this matchup, i noticed that on the road n.o.allows an average of 147 yds. per game on the ground....at 5.5 ypr.(ranked 29th in rushing defense) and that was with hollis thomas playing at defensive tackle. now that he will be suspended for the remainder of the season, i think dallas (with 2 quality running backs) will be able to run all day on the n.o. defense.

in his 6 starts, tony romo has played very well...averaging a very high 8.94 yards per pass attempt.

on the other side of the ball, n.o. is ranked # 28th in running the ball. last week n.o. was without their top 2 receivers (horn left the game with a groin injury & colston missed last week with an ankle injury) & it was the first time in a long time that brees didn't throw for over 300 passing yards.so even if both receivers play, i question how effective they will be.if that's the case, the dallas defense will be able to key on bush.

over the course of the year the dallas defense has dramatically improved.they gave up 25 pass plays of 20 yards or more in the first 8 games of the season, or just over 3 per game. that number has been reduced to 6 plays in the last 4 games, or just 1.5 per game.they are ranked #4 in the league overall & against the run. they have not allowed more than 14 points in 4 of the last 6 games, including 3 of the past 4. they also rank near the top of the league in forced turnovers with 26, including 10 over the past 4 games.

n.o. has scored 31 or more points in 4 of their last 5 games. i've read that teams in this situation have a tendency to have an offensive letdown (28-60 ats...1-3 ats this year).....especially the final 4 games of the season (6-21 ats).but again this is a prime time game so i don't expect too much of a let down by either team.

as a long time giant fan, it pains to say this...i think dallas is the best all around team in the nfc east....& i think they have a very good shot of playing in the super bowl.

i see dallas winning this game rather comfortably.


good luck.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
adding....

under 41 (130) cin/oak....

cin. defense has recently stepped it up & over the last 3 games have given up a total of 23 points....while the oak. defense continues to play well & is rated #1 in total defense.

trends supporting this play....

oak. is 6-0 under in road games vs. good passing teams averaging 7 or more passing yards/att. over the last 2 seasons...

oak. is 10-2 under in road games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons.

the above trends show the raiders philosophy under shell....play conservatively.

a system supporting this play....

the league is 0-18-1 o/u since 2003 as a dog on sunday the week after their 10th loss of the season....

the idea behind this system is that teams get dejected the week after their 10th loss & tend to play conservatively the next game to prevent a costly turnover.


good luck.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
thanks vicc...appreciate it.


adding 2....7.5 pt. teasers....

dall...p
u 55

the way that i see this game unfolding is that dallas will dominate it by running the ball since the n.o. allows about 5 ypr.....this means ball control....eating up the clock. as it is dallas averages a little over 33 minutes in time of possession...i look for dallas to have the ball about 35 minutes of the game....which means that n.o. won't get many opportunities to score.and with the 2 n.o. wide receivers hurting, i think n.o. will try to also run the ball & use a short passing type of offense.


s.d..p
u 48.5....

first let me say that i can't see s.d. losing this game to a team that is starting a rookie making his first road start. i also see this as a defensive game between 2 division rivals.and after the way denver (cutler) played last week on offense, i see a pretty conservative game plan by shanahan. also since week 8, 1994 denver is 0-6 o/u on the road when facing a team that they lost to in their first meeting....while s.d. is 0-6 o/u since week 13, 2004 at home vs. a divisional opponent.


good luck.
 

AM2kidz

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 9, 2000
480
0
0
Brandon FL
Hey AR ... I really enjoy your analysis and insight... Love the picks today... I think you rebound welll today.. GL and Thanks Am2kidz
 

Radio

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 16, 2005
102
11
18
great write up. i have been mulling a large shot this week on a 2 team 6pt teaser

dal -1 & San D. -1, both at home, both with plenty to play for. merriman back for san d. & a reality check for the weakness of the n.o. schedule. i realize anything can happen but i was considering my biggest wager this year, and your post has helped me make up my mind.

also going to try a smaller, 3 team 10 pter.
dal +3, san d. +3, cinn -1

and for good measure;
straight 3 team parlay
dal-7
san d. -7
cinn -11
just in case we have this one read correctly, which i think is the case. i like all three at home, and they all need the game, cinn legal problems a little concerning, but still they are much the better team and better coach.
 

Mully

Is Blessed
Forum Member
Nov 7, 2004
5,619
31
0
53
GL today my friend..

Like the Dalllas play quite a bit.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
thanks guys...appreciate it.

i'm going to be out for most of the day. but wanted to check some things before i left.

a site that i use that monitors % of wagers (not a sportsbook) has the following....

out of a little over 84,000 wagers in the n.o./dallas game.....

67% are on n.o.....while 33% are on the dallas.

but the line went opposite of the majority of bets... from an opening 6.5/7...to 7.5 or 8 in some places.

this game reminds so much of the notre dame/usc game in college football.....where most people played the team that is/was supposed to have a great offense....but like the nd/usc game those people who played the irish did not look at the complete picture. sure n.d./n.o. have a high power offense, but neither team could run the ball effectively or play championship caliber defense.

the saints have played one well balanced team on the road that is similar to the cowboys offense that can both run & throw the ball effectively....& they gave up 38 points to pitts. n.o. has given up an average of 31 points this year to the 3 good offensive teams they have faced this year.

the saints are a misleading 8-4 team because they don't have any quality win this year. every time they have stepped up in class, they have lost..... carolina...21-18,baltimore...35-22,pittsburgh...38-31, & cincinnati...31-16. this year their wins are over cleveland, green bay, tampa tay (twice), atlanta (twice) and san francisco.

as i briefly mentioned above n.o. is also dealing with off-field distractions and a variety of injuries. starting dt hollis thomas (43 tackles, 4 sacks) has been suspended for 4 games for steriod violations.
in addition, wr joe horn (groin), wr marques colston (high ankle sprain) and de will smith (knee) are questionable for tonight's game.i read that horn & colston did not practice as late as thursday.

I like the way the cowboys are playing, especially at home,their offense is very well balanced & their defense is coming together.

i mentioned how this game reminds me of the nd/usc game.for that game i made my largest play of the season of college football on usc....& because i won that i will make the cowboys my largest play this season in the nfl....at dallas-6 (buy).

but of course nothing is guaranteed.....so if anybody is playing dallas because of this writeup, please use your head & bet what you can comfortably afford in case n.o. covers.


good luck.
 
Last edited:

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
i apologize to anybody who followed me with this dallas play...to say that their performance is disappointing is an understatement. n.o is a one dimensional team who can't run the ball well & their defense is suspect...but they look like all-stars.

although i will still be betting on games i won't be posting plays anymore (i'm not leaving) because the info i post is useless if it doesn't win & causes people to follow & lose money.

all in all i came out winning some money in both nfl & college but not like years past.

good luck.
 

cavy1

Registered User
Forum Member
May 8, 2002
1,637
15
38
Clwtr, Fl
although i will still be betting on games i won't be posting plays anymore (i'm not leaving) because the info i post is useless if it doesn't win & causes people to follow & lose money.


good luck.

Thanks AR
that's exactly what I did 2 years ago after giving out bad info

I check Madjacks at least 10 times a day in every sport and gen discussion
just love this place

cavy1
 

Radio

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 16, 2005
102
11
18
thanks for your posts. i always look for your insight and thoughts on games. i would do it again. that's right, bet on dallas at home in december based on the info we had going into this game. you made a good call.

it appears the cowboys have been listening to the commentators who have them in the superbowl instead of listening to parcells.

all your analysis was on target. how could you know the cowboys would not show up at home on national tv. n.o. had lost to the good teams so far just like you said. i don't ever remember a good parcells team putting up that poor of an effort.

they quit running the ball early. it was like after the first dallas touchdown the team went into blowout mode and got blown out. that is not parcells football. the NFL may be dominated by premadonna "stars" that have become "uncoachable". the incredible money involved has taken this to a level never planned for. regardless of dallas losing, those type poor efforts disallusion fans. heart and passion are almost as important as winning.

i met a doctor in vegas last month that does not even watch NFL anymore, much less bet it. most would say well he just took bad beats. but he used to help with some type medical for an nfl team. he was so fed up with the millionaire egos of today's players. he said, the massive money has turned this into a completely different game.

they looked lost on defense. you had this one called correctly, this was a disappointing freak game of the NFL. i hope you will continue to post.
this was a mind numbing punch in the gut. maybe in a few days we will come back to earth.

terry glenn is the only cowboy that played with any heart/passion or desire to win. i just don't think n.o. is this much better than dallas. something else was also at work last night.
i'm not saying fix, but something else strange happened. it was as if they were in the huddles with the cowboys. maybe it was just former coaches that know how to beat parcells systems.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top