Dang ... made the mistake of looking at tomorrow's board.
I also couldn't help but recognize that my only hit yesterday, of those posted, was the one doggie - Philly (and lucky as sin there!). Made me consider the strategy of STICKING ONLY TO THOSE DOGS THAT I CAP AS PROBABLE WINNERS. Dogs, and maybe the odd -110 to -120, if I cap 'em at 60 or higher. My dogs are now the one area of my record that remains unblemished, although I still believe my 'cap stats will show that my #'s aren't too far off, statistically. Problem there is that the stats I recorded, and posted, reflect ALL games, not strictly the ones that I play, or those that show any +value.
I'm throwing down on 2 woofs tomorrow. One (Chisox) is a dog I 'capped at 60. Colon IS the better starter, and I believe that his experience gives him a further edge here. Sweep might seem unlikely, but this is just one game -- the past two tempt me to prefer the Whites, if anything, instead of using any type of "revenge" logic. Kim should give the Bosox a solid 5 or 6 (7, I think, at the absolute most), Sox poor pen will have less options tomorrow after the extra-innings, and Myers is rock-solid and has a decent chance to bounce back after a couple of poor outtings.
I presently suck.
Fade 'em if you got 'em.
PLAYS:
Phillies +105 -+- 1/1.05
Chisox +115 -+- 3/3.45
Avoided temptation on:
Jays -150
Bosox@Philly under 8.5 +100
Cards -1.5 +115
Rockies -1.5 -110
SF@A's under 9 -110
NYY@NYM under 8 -110
P.S. ump Nauert, for Chi@Chi, has been a solid under play for his career, including 11-2 this season. One spot has a total listed at 8, but I have enough on Sox, and totals at Wrigley Field can be as difficult to predict as the weather.
Good Chance and Go Jays (regardless of $$$)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And if the dam breaks open many years too soon
And if there is no room upon the hill
And if your head explodes with dark forbodings too
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon
(Waters-Pink Floyd-Dark Side of the Moon-Brain Damage)
I also couldn't help but recognize that my only hit yesterday, of those posted, was the one doggie - Philly (and lucky as sin there!). Made me consider the strategy of STICKING ONLY TO THOSE DOGS THAT I CAP AS PROBABLE WINNERS. Dogs, and maybe the odd -110 to -120, if I cap 'em at 60 or higher. My dogs are now the one area of my record that remains unblemished, although I still believe my 'cap stats will show that my #'s aren't too far off, statistically. Problem there is that the stats I recorded, and posted, reflect ALL games, not strictly the ones that I play, or those that show any +value.
I'm throwing down on 2 woofs tomorrow. One (Chisox) is a dog I 'capped at 60. Colon IS the better starter, and I believe that his experience gives him a further edge here. Sweep might seem unlikely, but this is just one game -- the past two tempt me to prefer the Whites, if anything, instead of using any type of "revenge" logic. Kim should give the Bosox a solid 5 or 6 (7, I think, at the absolute most), Sox poor pen will have less options tomorrow after the extra-innings, and Myers is rock-solid and has a decent chance to bounce back after a couple of poor outtings.
I presently suck.
Fade 'em if you got 'em.
PLAYS:
Phillies +105 -+- 1/1.05
Chisox +115 -+- 3/3.45
Avoided temptation on:
Jays -150
Bosox@Philly under 8.5 +100
Cards -1.5 +115
Rockies -1.5 -110
SF@A's under 9 -110
NYY@NYM under 8 -110
P.S. ump Nauert, for Chi@Chi, has been a solid under play for his career, including 11-2 this season. One spot has a total listed at 8, but I have enough on Sox, and totals at Wrigley Field can be as difficult to predict as the weather.
Good Chance and Go Jays (regardless of $$$)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And if the dam breaks open many years too soon
And if there is no room upon the hill
And if your head explodes with dark forbodings too
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon
(Waters-Pink Floyd-Dark Side of the Moon-Brain Damage)
