Nwe / Den Over 36

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
NEW ENGLAND / DENVER OVER

These two teams have played a combined 5 OVERS and 11 UNDERS through eight weeks. Furthermore, the Broncos are down to their third (or is it fourth) string quarterback. For that reason, the total has dipped to an all-time low for a Broncos home game -- at "36."

It's easy to understand why this number has dropped beyond what would nprobably be a total up around the 43 to 45 range.
I'll decline listing the reasons for the UNDER because they are so obvious.

But for many reasons, I'm playing the OVER. Here are the reasons why:

1. The Broncos are 5-3 SU and are a winning team. Sharp's comments to the media this week indicate an entirely new focus on tonight's game. Although the Broncos have struggled since QB Plummer's injury, I expect this re-focus to motivate the Broncos offense to produce points this week.

2. QB Kannell is starting for the Broncos. I think the bad performance last week at Baltimore actually helps him this week as it's always tough to make a first start on the road. Now, Kannell will have the comfortable confines of Mile High Stadium and, better yet, will have a very motivates cast on the offense to support his efforts. The Broncos offense line remains intact and healthy for the most part, which give Kannell some options.

3. Denver can still run the ball. They are the NFL's third ranked running game. If Denver can run, that probably means some passing opportunities will open up, no matter who the WRs are. It's been reported that WR McCaffery will see action. Sharp is ailing but should also play. I don't trust Shannahan's injury reports. This could be a trap to get the opponent to think the Broncos are more banged up than they really are. Sure, there are some injuries, but Denver is very much a SYSTEM team, which wins or losses based on the system of the head coach (and OC).

4. New England is on a roll, but has shown some vulnerability on defense, especially with several injuries. They've faced a slew of one-dimensional offenses this season. I'm not conviced this defense will play as well as they have against the likes of Cleveland and Miami the last two weeks.

5. Denver's defense is full of injuries (LB Mobley is out). That's a huge loss for the Broncos. Denver has surrendered an average of 24 points in its last four games to some lethargic offenses. I expect Patriots will have some offensive success.

6. Even with all the UNDERs these teams have played in 2003, the average mean score for both teams combined in all games is 38. This means this total is TWO POINTS below the average. Best of all, that means we pick up the key number of 37 and get a push on another significant number, which is 36. We pick up the push on prospective scores such as 20-16, 23-13, 27-9, 30-6 and wins on common scores such as 21-16, 20-17, 23-14, 24-13, 27-10, 30-7, and 31-6.

7. Five of the last six games between these two teams have gone OVER. In the precceding eight games between these two teams (since 1995), 40 points or higher have been scored in every game.

8. Normally, the kicking game wouldn't be much of a factor. But these two teams have two of the best FG kickers in the NFL. This might not seem important, but when any kick inside the 50 is almost automatic, that means each team is probably worth +3 extra points in every game it plays.

9. Monday Night Football normally brings out some odd plays (kick returns, etc.) and creates more intensity to perform. If this game was played in NWE, I'd probably pass on the total. But the home game in Denver is likley to help the Broncos (who are the main concern so far as scoring goes).

I think we have value, history, and contrarianism on our side. The play is OVER 36.

-- Nolan Dalla
 

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
Hey EaglesFan,

No more SIDES betting for me. I've lost my ability to analyze these games and pick a side. It's a combination of my flawed methodology and games which are just mind-boggling (officials throwin flags coaches making insane calls, stupid players, etc.). Sticking with the one thing that I still have some confidence in. Good luck.

Nolan Dalla
 

acer69

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2001
508
0
0
Mizzou. USA
NE can stop the run which will force Kanell to the air. Just don't see Kanell doing much. Lot's of field goals in this one. I respectfully disagree w/ the over.
 

Edward Mush

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 21, 2002
194
0
0
50
Lynchburg Tennessee
I liked it...

I liked it...

after reading the post above I am sold....over 35.5 it is.....Acer, what does a lot of field goals mean? Hopefully 12 or more...:thefinger
 
T

THE GOAT

Guest
I LIKE IT..IM WITH YOU NOLAN...I PICK AGAINST SF AND THEY BEAT TAMPA, BET ON THEM AT ARIZONA AND THEY LOSE, AND PASSED YESTERDAY WHEN THEY ROLLED ONE OF THE HOTTEST TEAMS IN THE NFL WITH THEIR BACKUP QB IN...WHAT THE F@^%@^% IS THE DEAL WITH THIS YEAR ANYWAY?
 

eire

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 27, 2003
237
0
0
Michigan
Great write up Nolan!!!
I agree that the over is the play.
Two good defenses against struggling offenses usually means a lot of turnovers!!!!!
With good field position, each team should be able to at LEAST come away with a field goal...
 

cooz3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
6,026
2
0
boston
nolan im sure you well aware of this by adam V. isnt the most accurate kicker outside of say 35 yards...im sure the denver air will help..which may add a few yards on his kicks....but that still doenst help his accuracy...

best of luck tonight

cooz
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
The Goat you may see that tonight for Denver. And there are places Den is less then 2.5.
 

Innavation

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 15, 2001
3,280
5
0
not playing the total but just a few thoughts that i considered when reading your thread.

I agree with this play being a contraion play and usually when everyone is on a play it usually goes the other way. FOr Ex. Giants Dallas while back on Monday night, everyone was on the under. But if these 2 would meet now, the total would be readjusted and be higher. WHy?/ Because both of these team have better offenses compared to last year, and will continue to put up good offensive numbers. My concern is where the total is set at, when capping game one step i use is to try and see where they want the money to come in at. It seems that they set a low enough total to where they know people will play the under. If the total was 37 i would defenitely play it over. Sounds crazy. But the bottom line and deciding factor for me will be to observe the line up until gametime. U seem to have a feel for how this game to go, and those are the best plays. The ones where u seen 2 teams play and can play the game out. I do not have a feel for this game, but line mov't may provide the winner in a high-profile Monday night game. Good luck i hope u get this one, like i said I'm not playing the total, but looking at the game with no analysis, the regular Joe that picks up the paper will say under. LIne goes up minutes before--u got a winner.
 

pt1gard

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 7, 2002
7,377
3
0
seattle
good job Nolan

good job Nolan

hope your 2nd half is kind to you, I know U put in your homework, the dogs barked this week which is always good for you

take care
gregg
 

MR.MANHATTAN

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 8, 2003
182
0
0
eloquent

eloquent

that is the only word to desxcribe that analysis,NOLAN u were right on,k.o. returns everything and the kickers,they played a big part,i attribute J. Elam(the worlds best imo)getting injured to new englands winning,for if he is ok the broncs kik at least 1 f.g......so the broncs w/3rd string qb and no elam are a good team to fade.........i luv new england against the boys at n.e. in 2 weeks.....figure i get the pats at -2 1/2........win,lose or draw life is good.....where else nolan i ask you can a chip running dice dealing "papillion"live free and unfettered,except in the usa 's gambling world? Life is good........:) :(
 

Allnet

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 20, 2000
2,819
0
0
78
Port Arthur, Tx
Took the money won on GM's system plays and doubled down with your over play. Not very good MM, but a great week for sure.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top