Last night you had a line on the Philly/Bost game at -3 and 185'.
Right now its at -3 and 191......
So, with Philly's Coleman and McKie both listed as "day-to-day" why didn't both lines move if something is up????
I like Bost -3 and under 191 tonight.
Here's why: (assuming Coleman & McKie are out)
-Philly loses the team's 2nd & 3rd leading scores without Coleman and McKie who average 15 and 12 respectively.
-Philly is 2-1 against the Celts this season:
Dec. 17 @ Philly a 99-83 Philly win with Coleman's 9 and McKie's 17
Jan. 25 @ Bost a 106-90 Philly win with Coleman's 11 and McKie's 5
Mar. 4 @ Philly a 100-94 Bost win with Coleman's 16 and McKie o (out)
-I see similar matchup problems tonight for Philly tonight without McKie's defense......which lead to Philly's Mar. 4 loss in Boston.
-The trends seem to point ya toward the under here:
*In the last 9 meetings the over is 7-2
BUT
*The under is 3-1 in the 6'ers last 4
AND
*Boston's last 4 home games have all played under
-For the season:
............Philly....Bost
Pts For.......91'......96'
Pts Allowed...89'......94'
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Talk in Boston today was about step'n up the effort on the defensive side of the ball. That fact, combined with Coleman and McKie likely being out tonight has me like'n the Celts and under.
Will need to watch the pre-game show an make sure of Philly's line up but will go ahead with the plays for now.
If someone else has a theory on this 5' rise in the total line.......I'd sure like to hear it!
Just don't see a Philly win'n or an over without Coleman and/or McKie.
Play'n Celts -3 and under 191 (for now)
1-0...LN
LAC over the team total of 101 W
119-75-2...YTD ez
Right now its at -3 and 191......
So, with Philly's Coleman and McKie both listed as "day-to-day" why didn't both lines move if something is up????
I like Bost -3 and under 191 tonight.
Here's why: (assuming Coleman & McKie are out)
-Philly loses the team's 2nd & 3rd leading scores without Coleman and McKie who average 15 and 12 respectively.
-Philly is 2-1 against the Celts this season:
Dec. 17 @ Philly a 99-83 Philly win with Coleman's 9 and McKie's 17
Jan. 25 @ Bost a 106-90 Philly win with Coleman's 11 and McKie's 5
Mar. 4 @ Philly a 100-94 Bost win with Coleman's 16 and McKie o (out)
-I see similar matchup problems tonight for Philly tonight without McKie's defense......which lead to Philly's Mar. 4 loss in Boston.
-The trends seem to point ya toward the under here:
*In the last 9 meetings the over is 7-2
BUT
*The under is 3-1 in the 6'ers last 4
AND
*Boston's last 4 home games have all played under
-For the season:
............Philly....Bost
Pts For.......91'......96'
Pts Allowed...89'......94'
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Talk in Boston today was about step'n up the effort on the defensive side of the ball. That fact, combined with Coleman and McKie likely being out tonight has me like'n the Celts and under.
Will need to watch the pre-game show an make sure of Philly's line up but will go ahead with the plays for now.
If someone else has a theory on this 5' rise in the total line.......I'd sure like to hear it!
Just don't see a Philly win'n or an over without Coleman and/or McKie.
Play'n Celts -3 and under 191 (for now)
1-0...LN
LAC over the team total of 101 W
119-75-2...YTD ez

