Osama Bin Laden in Iran -

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,557
311
83
Victory Lane
Osama bin Laden and top aides are hiding in Sabzevar, Iran
DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis June 8, 2010, 12:16 AM (GMT+02:00)Tags: Iran Osama bin Laden

Osama bin Laden stayed out of sight for yearsOsama bin Laden's hiding place was pinned down for the first time Monday, June 7, by the Kuwaiti Al-Siyassa Monday, June 7, as the mountainous town of Savzevar in the northeastern Iranian province of Khorasan, 220 km west of Mashhad. He is said to have lived there under Tehran's protection for the last five years, along with Ayman Al-Zawahiri and five other high-ranking al Qaeda leaders.
debkafile's intelligence sources disclosed Monday night that Turkish prime minister Recep Erdogan and his intelligence chiefs are well aware that Bin Laden and Zawahiri are hiding in Iran. The leak to the Kuwait paper was intended to show the Obama administration that the Turkish leader's ties with Iran had grown intense enough for him to be fully in the picture of Iran's secret sanctuary for the authors of the 9/11 attacks on the United States.

Savzevar, a small town of about a quarter of a million inhabitants, is connected by road to Tehran and Mashhad and has a small airport. A center for producing grapes and raisins, its location is remote and difficult to access because it is enclosed by lofty mountains and a salt desert 50,000 square kilometers in area.

On May 13, American intelligence sources reported in detail that senior al Qaeda operatives living in Iran had been allowed to leave the country through Syria to orchestrate terrorist attacks on American targets. Among them was Saif al-Adel, who is believed to have been assigned with planning an attack on the world soccer games opening in South Africa on June 12.
Those sources noted that Saif al-Adel had received his instructions directly from Osama bin Laden and Ayman Zawahiri but did not reveal knowledge of their presence in Iran.
debkafile's counter-terror sources disclose that the purpose of airing their precise whereabouts at this time, aside from implicating the Turkish leader, was first, to warn al Qaeda's leaders that their hideout was blown and they had better move on - which would make them easier to catch; and, second, to nudge US president Barak Obama into a decision to go after them.

A rare opportunity may now be building up to capture the world's most wanted terrorist, debkafile's counter-terror sources report. Last December, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates acknowledged the United States has not had any good intelligence on bin Laden's whereabouts in years. Until recently, the elusive master-terrorist was generally thought to have gone to ground in the wilder parts of Pakistan-Afghanistan border region.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

I hate to toot my own horn but I have been saying that was the only place he could be for the last four years.

Seems silly our own goverment couldnt figure that one out.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,557
311
83
Victory Lane
A rare opportunity may now be building up to capture the world's most wanted terrorist, debkafile's counter-terror sources report. Last December, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates acknowledged the United States has not had any good intelligence on bin Laden's whereabouts in years. Until recently, the elusive master-terrorist was generally thought to have gone to ground in the wilder parts of Pakistan-Afghanistan border region.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,



Yeh a perfect opportunity now that its in the news in the US.

:142smilie :142smilie

This should tell us all we need to know about Armadinnerjacket.

Maybe we should nuke the shit out of them

make sure it is big enough to take out all the leaders and get bin laden at the same time.

Let them start over like Japan
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,557
311
83
Victory Lane
News

Boy, 14, fatally shot by Border Patrol agent
Jun. 8, 2010 10:33 AM
Associated Press


EL PASO, Texas - A U.S. Border Patrol agent shot and killed a 14-year-old boy after a confrontation at an international bridge near downtown El Paso, Mexican authorities said Tuesday.

Agents detaining suspected illegal immigrants Monday came under assault from rock throwers across the border in Mexico, FBI spokeswoman Andrea Simmons said.


The FBI is leading the investigation because it involved an assault on a federal officer. The agent was not injured, she said.

Chihuahua State officials released a statement Tuesday demanding a full investigation into the death of the boy, identified as Sergio Adrian Hernandez Huereca.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman Doug Mosier said preliminary reports indicated one person was shot Monday evening on the U.S. side of the Paso Del Norte bridge, across from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.

The border at this point is a broad muddy moat flanked by shallow concrete banks.

T.J. Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council, said rock throwing incidents against Border Patrol agents are common and capable of causing serious injury.

"It is a deadly force encounter," Bonner said. "One that justifies the use of deadly force."

The violence in Mexico combined with assaults against Border Patrol agents in the U.S. has increased the level of apprehension agents have about their safety, Bonner said.

Less than two weeks ago, Mexican migrant Anastacio Hernandez, 32, died after a Customs and Border Protection officer shocked him with a stun gun at the San Ysidro border crossing that separates San Diego and Tijuana, Mexico.

Last week the San Diego medical examiner's office ruled that death a homicide

...........................................................

shoot some more of them

just dont give them the chance for a confrontation.

you enter America border you die.

Leave you for the buzzards

no other country in the world would allow this
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,557
311
83
Victory Lane
Associated Press
Job openings rise to highest level in 16 months
By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER , 06.08.10, 01:08 PM EDT


WASHINGTON -- Job openings jumped in April to the highest level in 16 months, a sign that private employers may boost hiring in coming months.

The number of jobs advertised at the end of April rose to 3.1 million from 2.8 million in March, the Labor Department said Tuesday. That's the most openings since December 2008.

zPrivate employers accounted for the entire net gain. The government's advertising for jobs decreased, despite the hiring of hundreds of thousands of census workers in May.

The department's report, known as the Job Openings and Labor Turnover survey, or JOLTS, follows a disappointing employment report Friday that found private employers added only 41,000 jobs in May. Temporary census hiring accounted for 411,000 jobs. The unemployment rate fell to 9.7 percent from 9.9 percent in April.

The rise in job openings "makes you a little more upbeat about the labor market," said Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan Chase ( JPM - news - people ).

The competition for jobs remains tough. There were 5 unemployed people, on average, for each job opening in April. That's down from 5.4 in the previous month, but well above pre-recession levels of 1.8 jobless workers per opening.

The biggest increases in available jobs were in professional and business services, leisure and hospitality and education and health services. Government job openings fell by 36,000.

The report also found that the number of people quitting jobs topped total layoffs for the third straight month. Nearly 2 million people quit their jobs in April, an increase of about 130,000 in the past two months. An increasing number of people voluntarily leaving jobs is a sign of confidence in the employment market, economists say. Workers are less likely to cling to their jobs if they believe others are available.

Other surveys also show that companies are likely to increase hiring, though at a slow pace. Staffing company Manpower Inc. ( MAN - news - people ) said Tuesday that its quarterly employment outlook found more employers are planning to hire in the July-to-September quarter than the preceding three months.

Manpower said its employment index rose to a seasonally adjusted 6 percent, a point higher than in the March-to-June period. The index was at -2 a year ago, meaning more employers planned to cut jobs than hire. The survey covers 18,000 private and government entities.

Separately, the National Federation of Independent Business said Tuesday that its small business optimism index rose to 92.2. That's the highest level since September 2008, when Lehman Brothers ( LEHMQ - news - people ) collapsed and the financial crisis intensified. But that's still below the index's long-run average of 99, according to Paul Dales, an economist at Capital Economics.

The NFIB's employment index rose to 1, the first positive reading in 19 months. It suggests more small businesses plan to add workers than cut them.

The reports come after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said late Monday that the recovery will continue "but it won't feel terrific." That's because economic growth won't be robust enough to quickly drive down the unemployment rate, now at 9.7 percent, he said in remarks to the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, a nonpartisan research group.

More job openings added to the picture of a slow but steady recovery.

A monthly analysis by the Associated Press of conditions around the country showed that manufacturing job gains in the Midwest helped lower the nation's economic stress in April to its lowest point in five months. Economic stress levels dipped in every state except Louisiana and Nevada in April.


Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
..............................................................

:00hour
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Probably easier to find Bin Laden if you are actually looking for him, and not using him to forward your military-oil-political fortunes for years and years.

Just sayin'. :SIB
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,557
311
83
Victory Lane
Hispanics flee Arizona ahead of immigration law

By Alan Gomez, USA TODAY

Arizona's tough new immigration enforcement law is fueling an exodus of Hispanics from the state seven weeks before it goes into effect, according to officials and residents in the state.
Though no one has precise figures, reports from school officials, businesses and individuals indicate worried Hispanics ? both legal and illegal ? are leaving the state in anticipation of the law, which will go into effect July 29.

Schools in Hispanic areas report unusual drops in enrollment. The Balsz Elementary School District is 75% Hispanic, and within a month of the law's passage, the parents of 70 students pulled them out of school, said District Superintendent Jeffrey Smith. The district lost seven students over the same one-month period last year, and parents tell Smith the Arizona law is the reason for leaving.


They're leaving to another state where they feel more welcome," he said.

The measure, signed into law April 23 by Republican Gov. Jan Brewer, requires a police officer to determine a person's immigration status if they are stopped, detained or arrested and there is "reasonable suspicion" they are in the country illegally.

About 100,000 illegal immigrants left Arizona after the state passed a law in 2007 that enhanced penalties on businesses that hired them, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Some early signs suggest another exodus.

Businesses serving the Hispanic community say business is down, signaling that illegal immigrants are holding on to cash in anticipation of a move from the state, said David Castillo, co-founder of the Latin Association of Arizona, a chamber of commerce for nearly 400 first-generation Hispanic business owners.

"(Brewer) signed the law, and everything fell apart," Castillo said. "It's devastating."

Jorge Vargas plans to move to New York City because his air-conditioning business relies mostly on Hispanics. "My business is completely dead," he said.

Juan Carlos Cruz, an illegal immigrant who has worked in plant nurseries for 20 years, huddled with dozens of relatives over the Memorial Day Weekend in the backyard of his brother's Phoenix-area home to plot out the family's next move to avoid what they say will be harassment by police. Virginia and California are the front-runners.

"If I were alone, I'd try to stay. But I have a family, and I have to find a place where we can live with more freedom," said Cruz, who hopes to move July 4 to blend in with holiday weekend traffic. "This is getting too hard." :SIB

Paul Senseman, a spokesman for Brewer, said it's difficult to gauge how many people are leaving because of the law, but he said he hears similar reports of people leaving the state.

"If that means that fewer people are breaking the law, that is absolutely an accomplishment," he said.
............................................................

The idea is not to leave Arizona because of their tough new laws.

The idea is to go back to Mexico if you are a illigal and stop sending all your money back there so you can retire when you have earned out.

Dont come to Georgia . You will not be welcome here and will be arrested.

stop the flow, shoot and go
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,557
311
83
Victory Lane
Former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin is setting the record straight about a new controversy she's calling ?Boob-gate!?

"Breast implants: Did you have them or not?" FOX News' Greta Van Susteren asked the ex-governor of Alaska during an interview. ?Because that?s all over the Internet about you, and mainstream media."

"No, I have not had implants," Palin went on to respond. "I think a report like that is about as real and truthful as those reports that Todd and I are divorcing or that I bought a place in the Hamptons or that Trig is not my own child."

...........................................................

Isnt Palin a big enough boob already :142smilie


as vane as she is I would almost guarantee the tits are full of silicon gel but that is not something to admit as it makes her look like her looks is all shes got.

Like the scarecrow in Wiz of Oz.

If she wanted to buy something it should have been half a brain not bigger titties.

Hope Madjack locked this forum again.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,557
311
83
Victory Lane
2010-06-09-sarahpalinbreastimplants2.jpg


I can see my boobs from Russia
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,557
311
83
Victory Lane
Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sitesHugh Tomlinson


Saudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defences to enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran?s nuclear facilities, The Times can reveal.

In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran.

To ensure the Israeli bombers pass unmolested, Riyadh has carried out tests to make certain its own jets are not scrambled and missile defence systems not activated. Once the Israelis are through, the kingdom?s air defences will return to full alert.

?The Saudis have given their permission for the Israelis to pass over and they will look the other way,? said a US defence source in the area. ?They have already done tests to make sure their own jets aren?t scrambled and no one gets shot down. This has all been done with the agreement of the [US] State Department.?

Sources in Saudi Arabia say it is common knowledge within defence circles in the kingdom that an arrangement is in place if Israel decides to launch the raid. Despite the tension between the two governments, they share a mutual loathing of the regime in Tehran and a common fear of Iran?s nuclear ambitions. ?We all know this. We will let them [the Israelis] through and see nothing,? said one.

The four main targets for any raid on Iran would be the uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz and Qom, the gas storage development at Isfahan and the heavy-water reactor at Arak. Secondary targets include the lightwater reactor at Bushehr, which could produce weapons-grade plutonium when complete.

The targets lie as far as 1,400 miles (2,250km) from Israel; the outer limits of their bombers? range, even with aerial refuelling. An open corridor across northern Saudi Arabia would significantly shorten the distance. An airstrike would involve multiple waves of bombers, possibly crossing Jordan, northern Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Aircraft attacking Bushehr, on the Gulf coast, could swing beneath Kuwait to strike from the southwest.

Passing over Iraq would require at least tacit agreement to the raid from Washington. So far, the Obama Administration has refused to give its approval as it pursues a diplomatic solution to curbing Iran?s nuclear ambitions. Military analysts say Israel has held back only because of this failure to secure consensus from America and Arab states. Military analysts doubt that an airstrike alone would be sufficient to knock out the key nuclear facilities, which are heavily fortified and deep underground or within mountains. However, if the latest sanctions prove ineffective the pressure from the Israelis on Washington to approve military action will intensify. Iran vowed to continue enriching uranium after the UN Security Council imposed its toughest sanctions yet in an effort to halt the Islamic Republic?s nuclear programme, which Tehran claims is intended for civil energy purposes only. President Ahmadinejad has described the UN resolution as ?a used handkerchief, which should be thrown in the dustbin?.

Israeli officials refused to comment yesterday on details for a raid on Iran, which the Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has refused to rule out. Questioned on the option of a Saudi flight path for Israeli bombers, Aharaon Zeevi Farkash, who headed military intelligence until 2006 and has been involved in war games simulating a strike on Iran, said: ?I know that Saudi Arabia is even more afraid than Israel of an Iranian nuclear capacity.?

In 2007 Israel was reported to have used Turkish air space to attack a suspected nuclear reactor being built by Iran?s main regional ally, Syria. Although Turkey publicly protested against the ?violation? of its air space, it is thought to have turned a blind eye in what many saw as a dry run for a strike on Iran?s far more substantial ? and better-defended ? nuclear sites.

Israeli intelligence experts say that Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan are at least as worried as themselves and the West about an Iranian nuclear arsenal.Israel has sent missile-class warships and at least one submarine capable of launching a nuclear warhead through the Suez Canal for deployment in the Red Sea within the past year, as both a warning to Iran and in anticipation of a possible strike. Israeli newspapers reported last year that high-ranking officials, including the former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, have met their Saudi Arabian counterparts to discuss the Iranian issue. It was also reported that Meir Dagan, the head of Mossad, met Saudi intelligence officials last year to gain assurances that Riyadh would turn a blind eye to Israeli jets violating Saudi airspace during the bombing run. Both governments have denied the reports.
..............................................................

It is hard to understand why Saudi A would allow this to happen .

Wouldnt that just set them up to be on the list to be attacked by Iran after the bombing ?

Saudis dont have much of a army to defend themselves.
 

rusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2006
4,627
11
0
Under a mask.
Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sitesHugh Tomlinson


Saudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defences to enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran?s nuclear facilities, The Times can reveal.

In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran.

To ensure the Israeli bombers pass unmolested, Riyadh has carried out tests to make certain its own jets are not scrambled and missile defence systems not activated. Once the Israelis are through, the kingdom?s air defences will return to full alert.

?The Saudis have given their permission for the Israelis to pass over and they will look the other way,? said a US defence source in the area. ?They have already done tests to make sure their own jets aren?t scrambled and no one gets shot down. This has all been done with the agreement of the [US] State Department.?

Sources in Saudi Arabia say it is common knowledge within defence circles in the kingdom that an arrangement is in place if Israel decides to launch the raid. Despite the tension between the two governments, they share a mutual loathing of the regime in Tehran and a common fear of Iran?s nuclear ambitions. ?We all know this. We will let them [the Israelis] through and see nothing,? said one.

The four main targets for any raid on Iran would be the uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz and Qom, the gas storage development at Isfahan and the heavy-water reactor at Arak. Secondary targets include the lightwater reactor at Bushehr, which could produce weapons-grade plutonium when complete.

The targets lie as far as 1,400 miles (2,250km) from Israel; the outer limits of their bombers? range, even with aerial refuelling. An open corridor across northern Saudi Arabia would significantly shorten the distance. An airstrike would involve multiple waves of bombers, possibly crossing Jordan, northern Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Aircraft attacking Bushehr, on the Gulf coast, could swing beneath Kuwait to strike from the southwest.

Passing over Iraq would require at least tacit agreement to the raid from Washington. So far, the Obama Administration has refused to give its approval as it pursues a diplomatic solution to curbing Iran?s nuclear ambitions. Military analysts say Israel has held back only because of this failure to secure consensus from America and Arab states. Military analysts doubt that an airstrike alone would be sufficient to knock out the key nuclear facilities, which are heavily fortified and deep underground or within mountains. However, if the latest sanctions prove ineffective the pressure from the Israelis on Washington to approve military action will intensify. Iran vowed to continue enriching uranium after the UN Security Council imposed its toughest sanctions yet in an effort to halt the Islamic Republic?s nuclear programme, which Tehran claims is intended for civil energy purposes only. President Ahmadinejad has described the UN resolution as ?a used handkerchief, which should be thrown in the dustbin?.

Israeli officials refused to comment yesterday on details for a raid on Iran, which the Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has refused to rule out. Questioned on the option of a Saudi flight path for Israeli bombers, Aharaon Zeevi Farkash, who headed military intelligence until 2006 and has been involved in war games simulating a strike on Iran, said: ?I know that Saudi Arabia is even more afraid than Israel of an Iranian nuclear capacity.?

In 2007 Israel was reported to have used Turkish air space to attack a suspected nuclear reactor being built by Iran?s main regional ally, Syria. Although Turkey publicly protested against the ?violation? of its air space, it is thought to have turned a blind eye in what many saw as a dry run for a strike on Iran?s far more substantial ? and better-defended ? nuclear sites.

Israeli intelligence experts say that Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan are at least as worried as themselves and the West about an Iranian nuclear arsenal.Israel has sent missile-class warships and at least one submarine capable of launching a nuclear warhead through the Suez Canal for deployment in the Red Sea within the past year, as both a warning to Iran and in anticipation of a possible strike. Israeli newspapers reported last year that high-ranking officials, including the former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, have met their Saudi Arabian counterparts to discuss the Iranian issue. It was also reported that Meir Dagan, the head of Mossad, met Saudi intelligence officials last year to gain assurances that Riyadh would turn a blind eye to Israeli jets violating Saudi airspace during the bombing run. Both governments have denied the reports.
..............................................................

It is hard to understand why Saudi A would allow this to happen .

Wouldnt that just set them up to be on the list to be attacked by Iran after the bombing ?

Saudis dont have much of a army to defend themselves.

Good.I'm all for it.
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
I'm sure the neo-cons would love for everyone to believe that Iran is hiding Bin Laden now.
Bingo. Isn't that convenient?

Fast-forward 5 years...

The War in Iran: Pentagon Briefing - 6/12/15

U.S. Troop Deaths to date: 3429
Iranian Military Deaths to date: Est. 74,000
Iranian Civilian Deaths to date: Est. 390,000
Cost to date: Est. $850 Billion
Enriched Uranium found: None
Osama Bin Laden: Whereabouts Unknown

Neoconservatives everywhere: :00hour

Trench
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top