packers/bears

[cooz3]

while i would certainly agree that there is a large consensus on one side tonight....the last two games greenbay has travled to chicago

the lines were
2002 ..chicago minus 1..gb win 34-21
2001...gb minus 3....20-12...

point being that this line looks about right at minus 4....just my opinion..

that being said ....there is always trouble when you have an extrodinary number of people on one side...and the line dos not move to boot..

cooz

 

[KsYaS]

Cooz3, I have a philosphy about the game, they're 4 ways to go, the fav, the dog, the under, and the over. Of course, an equilibrium is almost all the time there, why want to tell with this?? Who the hell knows if the money of the total is just in one way, and the line also is not moving a lot, so, maybe the go against play is the total, and go with the game!! just a thought!

 

[vanbasten]

Cooz3, I have a philosphy about the game, they're 4 ways to go, the fav, the dog, the under, and the over. Of course, an equilibrium is almost all the time there, why want to tell with this?? Who the hell knows if the money of the total is just in one way, and the line also is not moving a lot, so, maybe the go against play is the total, and go with the game!! just a thought!

cooz,

yeah!...what he said

just bustin KsYaS it took me three reads, but i think i got it..i think.

good luck to both of you.

 

[KsYaS]

ok, graphics!


GREEN BAY -5
CHICAGO +5

GAME OVER 41.5
GAME UNDER 41.5

THE 4 WAYS OR BETS TO DO IN A GAME

NOW, MAYBE THE MONEY IS CHARGED TO THE PACKERS, AND PACKERS WINS, BUT, MAYBE THE MONEY WAS CHARGED TO THE UNDER, AND THE OVER WINS.

OR

MAYBE THE MONEY IS CHARGED TO THE PACKERS, AND CHICAGO WINS, BUT, MAYBE THE MONEY WAS CHARGED TO THE UNCER AND THE UNDER WINS.

STILL VEGAS WINS 2 AND LOSE 2, THAT WHAT I CALL AN EQUILIBRIUM, HOME NEVER LOSE!

CAPISH?

 

[vanbasten]

CAPISH!

graphics 2...

bears +5 -> :nutkick <-packers

good luck KsYaS

 

[KsYaS]