Pac's Picks - Week 6

PacMan

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 28, 2000
246
0
0
Minneapolis
2002 NFL Season To Date: (all picks posted at MadJack's)
1x: 5-3 (+1.7 Units)
2x: 16-5 (+21.0 Units)
3x: 1-5 (-13.5 Units)
4x: 1-2 (-4.8 Units)

Sides: 21-10 (+12.4 Units)
Totals: 2-5 (-8.0 Units)
Parlays: 0-0 (+0.0 Units)
TOTAL HALFTIME BETS: 23-15 (+4.4 Units)

I have a terrible headache tonight, so I won't do any handicapping just yet. I wanted to explain a bit about my posts, and my strategy. If you just want to read my writeups on this weeks games, they'll be up sometime on Saturday, and you can just scroll down to the next post(s) once they are posted.

I post all of my week's plays in one thread, and have one thread per week. I often make multiple posts, as line changes can affect my decisions. Also, I usually don't have time to handicap every game in one sitting. My threads are generally light reading (except for this week).

Over the past year, I've decided to handicap first half bets, mostly as an experiment to see if there is any advantage in betting them. The key numbers in halftime betting are quite different than for an entire game, and sometimes the house just slices the game total in half, which I hoped would be an advantage. I still bet lines for entire games, but don't post them here. I've learned not to bet both a first half line and a game line for the same team, however.

One distinct advantage to halftime betting is the possibility of a tie. The odds of a tie at the end of a game are extremely slim. Less than one game a season (on average) will end in a tie. However, halftimes end up in a tie quite often. I believe this gives a nice advantage to the small dogs, who might be +1 for a first half bet. I don't have the numbers over many years, but I'd bet a +2 dog (+1 for first half) probably covers first half bets more than the game, partially due to the potential for a tie at halftime. If the game is tied at halftime, the bet wins. If it's tied at the end of the game, there's only a 50-50 or so chance of them covering.

I do look at what some other handicappers write, but I don't look so much for their bets as much as their write ups. Some weeks, I don't look at all at what other handicappers say. Other weeks I spend an hour or two just reading what everyone else has to say before I begin. It all matters on whether or not I have a good feel for the matchups, and if I have enough time. Simply put, my picks are not a piggy-back of anyone on this board, or anywhere else. I often find other handicappers that I respect on the other side of my picks, and that is just fine. I won't be swayed.

I recently gave up on betting halftime totals. I started out last year betting mostly totals, adding in sides around midseason. I discovered I was doing better with sides, so I lowered my wagers on totals. Good thing, as I ended last season with an 0-11 streak on totals. I did still show a profit on all halftime bets, but it was because my wagers on sides carried me along.

Last season, I went 29-15-2 on sides. That's great, but it was not enough wagers to get too excited about. This year, as you can see, I've started out 21-10 on sides. That means 50-25-2 on sides so far. I'm not stating this to boast, but it is starting to appear (at least to me) that first half betting can be worthy.

Last year, and this year so far, I've rated (and bet) plays on how strongly I feel about them. As you can see, my big risks this year are killing me. I haven't decided if I will continue the big variance (1 unit on one play, 4 on another), but I probably won't. As I mentioned, this started as a bit of an experiment, but now that halftime bets account for more than half of my NFL wagers, I want to practice a little better money management.

Speaking of money management, I'll tell you that, for me, 1 unit = 1% of my bankroll. That means, a majority of my halftime bets have been 2%. Most people would agree that that is rather conservative. I still will not risk more than 4% of my bankroll on a first half bet, but I probably will ditch the 1 unit bets from now on, especially considering I'm sticking primarily with sides. I might try totals again at some point, but for 1 unit bets, and I don't necessarily recommend that you take them until I establish myself with them.

When handicapping games, I take a lot into consideration. I look at numbers, such as past first half performances, I look at yardage, how well/bad a team is at home or on the road, attempt to predict coaching strategies when I feel it is appropriate, check out Sagarin Ratings, see who the public is on (and bet the contrarian angle at times) and look at key matchups. None of these factors always weigh more than the others, and they are almost never equal either. There is no magic formula as far as my bets go. I do use a computer to help crunch numbers and generate reports, but I do not use it to predict winners.

I generally try to write up a paragraph on each bet I make. I almost never type up everything that I took into consideration when making the bet. I often emphasise numbers and trends in my writeups, but they rarely are the deciding factor - just one of the factors. If you're looking for a thoughtful analysis on a game, you won't find it here. Hopefully you'll find a little something that you didn't know, and give you more ammunition to pull the trigger on a team.

Unlike many handicappers, I generally leave other sports alone. I don't have the time to keep up with betting MLB, NBA, and the college sports every day. The NFL is a nice, leasurely one-game-per-team-per-week sport (excluding byes, of course). It gives me a chance to examine the games as much as I feel is necessary. I still bet other sports, and have success during certain times (beginning of conference in college hoops, baseball in August). I just can't spend enough time to risk too much money on them. Working during the day and betting baseball is a bit gruelling.

I do bet every game that I post, and for the number of units that I post. Even though my unit isn't a dime, I take betting seriously. I (usually) practice good money management, and I expect my initial bankroll to last the season. I use only three books (VIP, GameDay and Olympic for those of you who read this far), and I advocate using at least three for anyone who wants to take betting even somewhat seriously.

In summary, I believe that betting the first half line (as opposed to the game line) of NFL games can be advantageous. I hope to prove this throughout the course of the year, and in years beyond. I hope that my analysis will be a positive contribution to this board. This board certainly has been a good contributor to me.

Good luck,
PacMan
 

PacMan

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 28, 2000
246
0
0
Minneapolis
Early Games

Early Games

NEW ORLEANS AT WASHINGTON
1st Half Line: Pick, O/U 23.5

During both the pre-season, and the regular season, Washington has been a terribly slow starter. They might be 2-2, but have been down at halftime all four games, with no ties. The Saints found out in week 4 what happens when you underestimate an opponent, so I don't think they've forgotten yet. That doesn't mean they win the game, but based on Washington's history of slow starts, it's enough for a play.

The only thing that scares me is Aaron Brooks, against a solid defensive unit.

PLAY: 1st half New Orleans (-110) 2x


PITTSBURGH AT CINCINNATI
1st Half Line: Pittsburgh -3 (-115), O/U 20.5

One could have a hard time counting all of the reasons to go either way with this game. Cincinnati didn't give up last week, and covered. They are home dogs against a 1-3 team with a mostly untested QB. The Bengals remember how they beat the Steelers last year, and have to be thinking they can do it again, here at home, against a struggling Steelers team.

The Steelers go up against one of the worst starting QBs around. Sure, Kitna ripped them apart last year, and went 31-43 last week, but he also threw three picks last week. This is a guy who can show up to play, but usually doesn't. I think the Steelers will be more prepared if the Bengals try another 68 pass-attempts style offense this time around.

So far, I'd have to say the advantage goes slightly to the Bengals. Now, let's look at some numbers. Cincinnati, as a team, has thrown 10 INTs, and has a total QB rating of about 50. They've given up more first downs, rushing yards, passing yards, sacks (3:1 ratio), interceptions (10-3), TDs (18-5), FGs (7-3). Basically, they've been beaten badly in every way.

The Steelers, while 1-3, aren't exactly in shambles. Losing in New England and New Orleans, as well as against the Raiders isn't something to be all that embarrassed about. They are outsacking their opponents, and have a slight edge on first downs. So, now we're kind of even.

Now, let's look at first half performances. The Bengals haven't scored more than 7 in the first half so far. Their closest halftime score were the last two weeks, being down 21-7. Altogether, they are being outscored 99-17 in the first half.

The Steelers are also being outscored in the first half, but by a 52-37 margin. They were down by 3 to New England, 7 to Oakland, tied with the Browns, and down by 5 to New Orleans. So, they still haven't been up at halftime yet.

In all reality, here's their chance. The Steelers entered this season heavily favored to win their conference, and considered to be the among the top of the AFC. This thought has faded, due to their performances against some of the leagues best teams. Now, they go against arguably the worst team in the NFL. Granted, they're still considerably the favorite on the road in a conference game. I know that betting on a road favorite in a conference game is not generally a good idea. But, that assumes the line is accurate. I think this line has been moved a little too much towards Cincinnati, as people see Pittsburgh at 1-3 and think they are no longer very good.

PLAY: 1st Half Pittsburgh -3 (-115) 3x - Olympic's Line


CAROLINA AT DALLAS
1st Half Line: Dallas -0.5, O/U 17.0

Here's a game that should be a close, low scoring contest. If you read my above post, you probably already know who I like here. Dallas hasn't had a lead at halftime yet. Carolina's defensive line should get enough pressure on Wright to help him make mistakes, which he does well. Carolina's secondary might not be the greatest, but their team has still intercepted nine passes so far. I think carolina has a better chance of being up than down at half, and there is a very real chance of a halftime tie, I'll take a tie as a win.

PENDING: Waiting for Carolina +1 (some books have game line +2.5, so should get it)


DETROIT AT MINNESOTA
1st Half Line: Minnesota -2.5 (-115), O/U 24.5

If I were still betting halftime totals, I'd be on the over here. That means it will probably be a tight, low scoring game...

Minnesota's weaknesses are when Culpepper is under pressure, and when the opponents have at least an average offense. The Lions are averaging 250 yards of offense per game, and one defensive sack per game. The Lions thrown more than twice as many INTs as they have caught, and they are a terrible road team.

Minnesota is a solid home team, with a very loud stadium. If they can get an early lead, and have the fans on their side (for once), I don't think the Lions will be able to catch up. Therefore, I'd imagine the Vikings will be trying to get an early lead, as they did in their first three games. Unless Detroit gets enough pressure on Culpepper (which they haven't been doing to other teams), Minnesota should be able to move the ball downfield, and avoid turnovers. Getting the Vikings at less than a field goal is just right.

PLAY: 1st Half Minnesota -2.5 (-115) 3x


That's it for the early games. Still considering one other early game; will be back with the late games.

Good luck.
 

alb

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 30, 1999
1,871
7
38
Gibraltar
Interesting write-up. Sounds like you may be on to something so I'll be paying more attention to your posts.

Good Luck this weekend.
 

PacMan

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 28, 2000
246
0
0
Minneapolis
Some More...

Some More...

Well, I'm tired of waiting for my preferred line. Since Carolina has problems kicking FGs anyway, there probably isn't a difference between +0.5 and +1.

PLAY: 1st Half Carolina +0.5 (2x)

BALTIMORE AT INDIANAPOLIS
1st Half Line: Indianapolis -3.5, O/U 22.0

I've come to believe the Ravens are nocturnal. They slept through their first two (day) games, then came alive with big upsets at night. They return to the daylight, without McCrary or Ray Lewis. I really think missing Ray Lewis is huge for this disappearing defense. I have a hard time believing the Colts will take this Ravens team lightly after seeing them whip up on two heavily favored teams.

PLAY: 1st Half Indianapolis -3.5 (-110) 2x


JACKSONVILLE AT TENNESSEE
1st Half Line: Jacksonville -120, O/U 21.5

When almost everyone is on a bandwagon, I always look the other way. I really couldn't find a good reason to bet Tennessee, especially after finding this crazy line at Olympic. As with most of you, I just don't get this line. Sagarin ratings put the Jags as a 7.5 fave, even after factoring in 2.7 points for Tennessee being at home. This appears to be a classic example of the books taking a side in the game. Regardless, I still think the line is bad, and therefore will bet it.

PLAY: 1st Half Jacksonville pick (-120) 2x

Good luck.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top