Panel to Recommend Major Tax Law Changes

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Panel to Recommend Major Tax Law Changes
Nov 1, 9:55 AM (ET)
By MARY DALRYMPLE

WASHINGTON (AP) - Chosen to find a simpler way to tax the nation, a presidential panel is set to recommend two designs that would rewrite virtually every tax law for individuals and businesses.

Under the plan, most deductions, credits and other tax breaks would be eliminated along with much of the paperwork and equations that baffle taxpayers under a drastically simplified income tax.

But many, including the nine members of the presidential commission, have said key recommendations will be unpopular.

"The effort to reform the tax code is noble in its purpose, but it requires political willpower," the group said Tuesday in a letter to Treasury Secretary John Snow. "Many stand waiting to defend their breaks, deductions and loopholes, and to defeat our efforts."

The commission presents their findings to Snow, who told the Detroit Economic Club on Monday the nation's taxes need "not only theoretical reform, not only academic reform, but actual practical reform."

The President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform spent most of the year studying tax designs, including consumption taxes like a national retail sales tax. President Bush tasked the group with finding simpler and more economically productive ideas for taxation.

The commission wrapped up its work last month, and its ideas immediately attracted criticism - some from those wanted to see more change and some from those who felt the changes went too far.

Under both of the panel's alternatives, three out of four taxpayers would fall into the lowest, 15 percent, tax bracket.

Under one plan, individuals would pay no tax on dividends paid by U.S. companies and exclude 75 percent of their capital gains from taxation. Under the second plan, all investment income would be taxed at 15 percent.

Both proposals would abolish the alternative minimum tax, a levy originally drafted to prevent wealthy individuals from escaping taxation but increasingly reaching into the middle class. They also would eliminate federal deductions and credits for mortgage interest, state and local taxes and education, among others.

The advisory commission would replace those withdrawn tax breaks with simpler benefits, including three savings plans that supplant dozens currently available for retirement, medical expenses and education.

Bush set certain limits on the panel, requiring that the new plans collect as much tax money as the government collects now.

The proposals also had to retain the progressive system that taxes wealthier taxpayers at higher rates than poorer individuals and families. They were also required to recognize "the importance of homeownership and charity in American society."

The panel rejected frequently touted ideas to impose taxes on consumption, like a retail sales tax.

Instead, the group chose to use one recommendation to push for major simplification of the current income tax system. Its second recommendation makes changes for businesses that shift the nation's tax system toward indirect tax on consumption.

Snow said he expected the panel's ideas to halve the lines on a standard income tax return, also cutting in half the number of taxpayers who need to hire a professional tax preparer.

The panel determined that tax breaks for homeownership and employees' health insurance could be changed to spread their benefits to more middle-income families.

The panel would convert the home mortgage interest deduction into a credit, while lowering the $1 million limit on mortgages eligible for the tax break to an amount closer to average housing prices, with adjustments for geographical differences.

---
On the Net:
President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform: http://www.taxreformpanel.gov
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
Read real close Liberals because you morons keep telling us this isnt true : quoted from above ....

The proposals also had to retain the progressive system that taxes wealthier taxpayers at higher rates than poorer individuals and families. They were also required to recognize "the importance of homeownership and charity in American society."
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Importance of home owner ship. But why then do they want to take that deduction away.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
I'm glad their discussing this. Sounds like some their ideas may make things MORE complicated.

Please please simplify. I'm all for an ENFORCED flat tax. As long as their are so many loopholes and cheats, the % on wealthy will have to be high to compensate.

An across the board 10-15% combined with raising the minimum wage to eliminate Earned Income Credit would do the trick I would think.

But then there will be so many unemployed accountants. :scared
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top